Originally posted by Poorman
As soon as a negative post got on this board,Doc would delete it.
All posts on the DIS are subject to our site guidelines. If a post, on ANY forum, is deemed to be an attack on another poster, it will be removed.
In this case, the person reporting this "problem" was allowed/encouraged to post his report on this forum- which he did- several months ago. While claiming here to have followed all suggestions, it would appear that he neglected to ask for or verify any references for the individual he rented from.
We don't see how we can make it any clearer that "ALL TRANSACTIONS ARE BEWTEEN PARTIES" in these rentals. "Caveat Emptor" and "Buyer Beware" are other applicable phrases that come to mind.
The DIS gains nothing from these transactions and when we tried to go to an E-Bay type system, the suggestion was met with nothing but indignant opposition and threats before any operational details were even known. That effort was dropped and it's doubtful that any "rating" system will ever be offered as a result.
Anyone is welcome to offer praise, on this board, regarding their transactions and conversely is welcome to offer any negative experiences- contrary to the erroneous belief quoted above. No negative experiences have EVER been removed unless they were in violation of our site guidelines.
In addition to this one report of a problem with this one member (who is apparently no longer a
DVC member), we have had one complaint by a member about a renter. In that case the member made a reservation for a renter within 30 days of arrival without demanding payment in advance ... and never cancelled the reservation, allowing the renter to use the villa without ever paying. While it is regrettable that it occured, in this instance, the entire situation was entirely within the control of the member. There is a "Word To The Wise" post on the Rent/Trade Board as a result of that situation.
As for the comment
"Turns out the member's account was in the process of being taken back all along. He had no intention of following through with his end." It sounds as though any small claims action would be successful, if the member has actually admitted this. It could also be argued, in lieu of that admission, that the member was not aware that DVC would cancel all exisiting reservations when the contract was sold. The suggestion made above about repossession contradicts what was stated in earlier posts and while the member, IMO, should certainly be liable for any funds collected for his rental activity, collection may be challenging even with a small claims decision.
We continue to be proud of the record of satisfied rentals- from both sides- made possible thru the Rent/Trade Board.