Disney Doll
DIS Security Matron
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2000
- Messages
- 28,883
I think that both parts of your post exhibit a level of paranoia that would be unnecessary in nearly all circumstances.
If the OP has no reason to believe that the husband has been cheating on her, there is no need to run out and get tested. Further, I suspect that the OP is qualified to determine whether her husband would attempt to steal her childern's identity.
In theory, sbell, I would agree with you.
But, then there's that little "thing" in the back of my mind that says "She thought she knew him well enough to know he'd never walk out and he did that"...IMHO, and note I said IMHO, once someone starts doing things that are "out of character", you (the universal "you", not specifically you sbell) don't really know what else they'd be capable of. I have known many people who have said "My spouse would NEVER do that" only to have said spouse do what they NEVER would do. And that is both men and women...I am not making any of these statements specifically directed at male behavior, because I have had female acquaintances who have done stff that has curled my hair in terms of their marriage and fidelity to their vows!
Anyone, man or woman, whose spouse is capable of "walking out" on them & their kids, is capable of doing anything else they can think of. IMHO, if they can justify leaving, they can justify anything else...extramarital sex, excessive spending, addictions...
In this case of a husband with "champagne taste and a beer pocketbook", him stealing his children's SS # and running up big bills is not out of the realm of possibility. Heck, I used to get CC applications addressed to my dog, because his name was Teddy. It may be an avenue that the OP wasn't thinking about, so it would be good advice. As far as the physical or health concerns...many people who are having marital difficulties seem to think that find "someone else" will be the answer to all their troubles, that it will be "different" with someone else, that someone else isn't going to sit in the den and burp out loud or have PMS & be cranky. So it woud also not be out of the realm of possibility that the OP's estranged husband has had extra-marital liaisions. And again, in the middle of this tempest, would the OP think to monitor herself physically? Perhaps not.
You take some offense to the posts because you are clearly a decent and ethical man, who wouldn't dream of behaving in this manner with regard to your wife & family. Your posts remind me of my own husband...he is always surprised at human nature and how it reacts to things because HE would never dream of behaving in ways that he sees others behaving.
I would still advise the OP to protect herself and her children, physically, financially and in every other way possible. The husband left his wife and his children, which says to me that he has the potential to not contribute to the continued support of the children. If he was able to leave, he might be able to say "She can handle it" especially since, according to th initial post, money management doesn't seem to be a strong point & she has been the one bailing them out. Yes, we are hearing one side of the story and, yes that is the OP's opinion and not necessarily the truth, but, since Dad has left and she is the primary caretaker for those children, her opinion is the one that matters. Physically and financially the OP has to be prepared to take care of the kids, just in case the husband doesn't, because someone will have to. And I would note that her husband has indicated that he has spoken to a lawyer, so he is taking some steps to protect himself, as he should. The OP should do the same.
FTR, I have had male friends whose wives have left and I have given them the exact same advice. When there are children involved, the spouse who may be left being the sole caregiver for the child has to act quickly and do everything possible to protect themselves & their children. And I would agree that doing some "preparatory" or "protective" work need not preclude saving the marriage, if the OP chooses to do so.