That is an incredibly naive, and frankly elitist, though. Look at South Africa as an example. They closed their airspace. They had one of the strictest lockdowns in the world (no alcohol, no tobacco, no non-essential groceries, movement only within a very small radius of kilometres from home to get food)Then they reopened.
Now the virus is rampant, and the poor are in even more dire situations than before. The lockdown only benefited the middle and upper classes, and now many of them are losing jobs as well (well paying, 'white collar' jobs in finance, law, offices, etc) During the lockdown those living in poverty struggled even more to find food and medical care. The same situation is playing out across many countries globally, but here people are fixated on getting back to theme parks whilst elsewhere NGOs and voluntary organizations cannot get their people onsite to deal with the massive starvation our privileged decisions have caused. Nor does anyone seem to mention that here. The same situation is playing out across central and south America.
Even in places with a less strict lockdown, the virus rises. We knew that would happen when restrictions were lifted, and so long as testing/tracing and good medical care is in place, it can be managed. (Again, with the understanding that the US is on a different path than many countries in Asia and in Europe)
