My personal beliefs coincide with Joe's- I'm anti-death whether it's abortion, euthanasia, or state sponsored executions.
Having said that, I certainly understand the anger and emotion one feels towards an animal that would abduct, assault, and murder any innocent human being, especially a child. . . I feel it to. . .
The problem is, I've seen far too many cases where because of poor attorneys, overzealous prosecutors, politically posturing judges, and/or police mistakes or misconduct, someone is tried and convicted and sent to death row, only to be exonerated years later after a closer look into the case was conducted.
I'm not talking about any "if even 1 innocent person is executed it's all wrong" type of sentiment; I'm talking about estimates of between 30 and 40% of all death penalty convictions being flawed based on the small amount of those that have been reviewed by impartial 3rd-partys.
While I shed no tears when a Gacy or a Bundy get fried, I can't support a system that is so obviously messed up. Texas executes a retarded teenager; yet California won't even seek the death penalty against two vicious little monsters like the Menendez brothers because they have money and social standing? It wrong. And while no process would be perfect, I think every state should follow the lead of Illinois and suspend all executions until a more equitable and error-proof system is put into place.
I certainly understand the "eye-for-an-eye" feelings towards any murderer, but all too often the real murderer is still walking the streets while some poor slob sits on death row because he couldn't afford anything better then a public defender.
As far as the death penalty being a deterrent- it isn't. Obviously it does insure the person being put to death won't kill again (if they in fact were guilty of the first one), but a life term with no parole accomplishes the same thing at less cost. And the facts are the average annual murder rate among states that have the death penalty is 5.5% (per 100,000 population); while the annual rate is 3.6% among non-death penalty states. And countries like England and Canada, which have no death penalty, have lower murder rates then we do, while countries like Afghanistan and Uganda, which practice swift executions with little or no due process, have far higher murder rates then we do.
I think it'd be easier to make the case that having a death penalty increases the murder rate, but I'm sure there are many more factors involved. . .