*for the haters: the FP+ Only tests they have done are stupid. I don't agree with them. But those tests are a failure of management, not the FP+ system.
I can't take anyone seriously who uses the word "haters."

*for the haters: the FP+ Only tests they have done are stupid. I don't agree with them. But those tests are a failure of management, not the FP+ system.

I can't take anyone seriously who uses the word "haters."![]()

Actually FP+ does increase wait times by reducing capacity per hour at certain attractions.
Due to how it works, FP has already been proven in the past to be a bad idea for attractions with large capacity, such as boat rides like Pirates and small world, omnimover rides such as mansion, even journey into imagination with figment is a high enough capacity that we know FP only increases wait times by reducing capacity. This is a proven fact from when regular FP was first introduced and the reason that they pulled it from the Hugh capacity attractions like Mansion.
The goal of reducing wait times is the same goal as the goal of getting people into shops and restaurants to spend more money. They way they get people there is by getting them out of queues.
Therefore, FP+ makes lines longer.




I can only speak for myself, but I don't even care if I get less FPs now, that is not the real issue for me. I was never a super-power-user or whatever. If they had decided to promote the old paper FP which led to higher utilization and less FPs for me, I would have been fine with that.
The real issue for me is that each day is not a clean slate anymore. Before, no matter what happened, you could re-plan each day the night before, come up with a new strategy and go for it. This was great especially if you had a bad night's sleep, kids sick, weather, etc. That is what I miss most of all.
So I guess for me, I hate the feeling of being "locked in." It's what I love about visiting Universal onsite now, even though I don't enjoy their parks as much as the Disney parks...I love the feeling of being able to wake up and go, plan as much as you want or as little as you want. And you used to be able to do that at WDW. Now you can't.

I can't take anyone seriously who uses the word "haters."![]()
But you're missing OP's original point - total capacity (i.e. the number of people riding each day) is not affected by FP. Anyone riding less means someone else is riding more.
Even though I think OP is wrong about waits, I think that point is correct. Why wouldn't it be correct?
Using the Pirates example...
It was reported earlier this year (I don't know if it's still the case..happy to check in a few weeks when I'm there) that 1 entire side of the Pirates queue was dedicated to FP+ only. Given how Pirates loads, this meant that 1 entire loading area of Pirates was FP+ only, and when there weren't guests there that boats were going through empty/partially full even though there were people in the SB line on the other side of the queue, because they couldn't get people from that queue to the other loading area.
Like I said, I don't know if they've changed the merge point to make this no longer an issue, but it was the issue for a while. So, *in that case*, how could it be said that FP+ wasn't responsible for the increased wait time?
Or for rides that never had a FP before...where SB just continually loaded, and now there's a merge point and SB is held for FP+ people to board (in whatever ratio they use). So, for example, in Journey Into Imagination (which was *always* a walkon when we were there) - say you now have 12 people in line (I think maybe 4-6 can fit in the vehicle), and they are 6 separate parties - 3 parties in FP+, 3 in SB (2 people in each party).
In order of arrival:
Party #1 - SB
Party #2 - SB
Party #3- SB
Party #4-FP+
Party #5- FP+
Party#6- FP+
Previously, under no FP, they would have boarded in order 1-6, so SB party #1 would board immediately.
Now they are giving priority to FP+ over SB...so the 3 FP+ parties board first, and then the 3 SB parties.
How can it not be said that the 3 SB parties do not have a longer wait than they would have prior to that attraction having FP+?
(I realize the difference in wait time when talking about such a small number of people is minimal, but when the effect is multiplied the result is as well.)
It's been reported that the ratio to the # of FP+ parties boarding to SB parties boarding greatly increased when FP+ was implemented. I truly can't see how increasing the # of FP+ people who board before 1 SB person boards doesn't increase the SB wait.
But you're missing OP's original point - total capacity (i.e. the number of people riding each day) is not affected by FP. Anyone riding less means someone else is riding more.
Even though I think OP is wrong about waits, I think that point is correct. Why wouldn't it be correct?
No, I think you are missing my point - the OP posted "..spending less time in queues" and I countered "or riding less" because one undisputed effect is that people are now spending less time in the parks after using their 3 FP's.
That's an "undisputed effect"? Maybe if you said "at least some people" it would be undisputed, but it certainly isn't true for everyone.
If I made an absolute statement like that I can think of at least 2 or 3 of your fellow club members who would jump all over it.
Wis, I didn't say HOW MANY. Geez.....
Maybe this will make you feel better - I found myself leaving the parks earlier than I normally would have after using our 3 FP's.
Dispute that effect.
