queenarmadillo
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2006
- Messages
- 169
I think the real problem here is standardized testing. In primary school, my parents could take me out for a holiday if they wanted (which often they didnt cos I would miss the begining of term so have to get used to a new situation in which everyone else was already settled, or the end of term and miss the fun activities). I might miss out on a fair chunk of education about rainfall or the tudors, but in turn I would learn about spaceship earth and fossil fuels jeopardy style.
Today, due to the increase in standardized sylabuses, knowing about fossil fuels does not replace an ability to label the parts of a flower, or being coached into the precise language with which a SAT question needs to be answered. I certainly dont agree that this is an improvement on the way things were, but as it was an "improvement" implemented by our democratically elected government, then unless we are arguing democracy doesn't work, the majority of the country must have been in favour of it.
On a side not to the teacher bashing: the reason that the government is having to pay people to take teacher training and subsidize their degrees is because it is a job noone wants anymore. Teaching is one of the least respected of the degree professions, and although the long, unpaid holidays play a role in this, it is also one of the lowest paid. Sadly, most of the pupils now lack respect for their teachers aswell, so teachers (particularly in specialist schools) are lucky if they are merely ignored or shouted at rather than physically assaulted.
At least people with kids in school have the option of calling them in sick to get a term time holiday in. As the child of a teacher, there is absolutely no option of a termtime holiday, meaning we always have to pay top prices for our holidays, and I have to compete with all those who have the proper excuse of "kids in school" for the summer vacation dates if we want to go on a family holiday. If your kids had a supply teacher, it was because the teacher was sick enough to get a doctor's note, not cos she thought it would be nice to take advantage of the cheaper off peak vacation rates.
Today, due to the increase in standardized sylabuses, knowing about fossil fuels does not replace an ability to label the parts of a flower, or being coached into the precise language with which a SAT question needs to be answered. I certainly dont agree that this is an improvement on the way things were, but as it was an "improvement" implemented by our democratically elected government, then unless we are arguing democracy doesn't work, the majority of the country must have been in favour of it.
On a side not to the teacher bashing: the reason that the government is having to pay people to take teacher training and subsidize their degrees is because it is a job noone wants anymore. Teaching is one of the least respected of the degree professions, and although the long, unpaid holidays play a role in this, it is also one of the lowest paid. Sadly, most of the pupils now lack respect for their teachers aswell, so teachers (particularly in specialist schools) are lucky if they are merely ignored or shouted at rather than physically assaulted.
At least people with kids in school have the option of calling them in sick to get a term time holiday in. As the child of a teacher, there is absolutely no option of a termtime holiday, meaning we always have to pay top prices for our holidays, and I have to compete with all those who have the proper excuse of "kids in school" for the summer vacation dates if we want to go on a family holiday. If your kids had a supply teacher, it was because the teacher was sick enough to get a doctor's note, not cos she thought it would be nice to take advantage of the cheaper off peak vacation rates.