I haven't read all ten pages, and, I can't find where the article itself it.
I thought Fast Passes were designed to help reduce overall waittimes for major rides. Everyone who wanted to ride a particular ride had the option of waiting in line at the moment or waiting until 'later' to do the ride. Since you could only get a second FP after a certain period of time or use of the first FP, it wasn't the same as FOTL passes at Universal.
I read here that the execs thought that people would spend more money on food and shopping if they weren't standing in line...and even tho the accountants say that hasn't happened, I personally don't trust those figures. (Since 9/11, since gas prices have skyrocketed, since the economy recessed..people aren't spending as much per day period and that wasn't taken into account. I think if you are standing in line, you can't spend money. That's pretty clear.
The delayed time wherein you had to return to get into the fastpass lane made sense because it was equal to or more than the time you would have stood in line. Usually, people who use the fast passes, spend the time EITHER spending money or riding rides without a line....so essentailly for the park, it facilitated movement which was better for everyone...even the people standing in the long lines because the lines were less long than they would be without fastpasses.
I think the system could be less expensive for the bean counters if they automated the fastpass line instead of needing one or two CMs to take your fastpass.
The part of hooking it to your expenditures bothers me in that it doesn't take into account that the high roller might not be interested in any of the 'big' rides and might not need fastpasses. If they wanted to 'throw in' some perks like nonspecific time fastpasses for nonspecific rides, I don't think it would mess too much with the system in place, as long as they kept the system that is in place intact. It might be that the 'perk' is to save the high roller from running all over the park to get a fast pass here and then walk over there and then hike back to the original ride. If so, it really wouldn't effect that many people. Lots of people dont bother with fast passes, either lack of knowledge or it just isn't worth the extra planning/walking.
I choose to visit when I hope there won't be crowds. Sure, if I'm walking past SpaceM I will pick up a fastpass if the line is too long. Before fastpass, I 'd just go do another ride and check the line again later. I make ample use of single lines too. Not sure what I'd 'get' as a perk with DVC ownership and AP...they already have my money. I'm sure DVC and APers would gripe and get some sort of concession. I hope that even tho they might perk onsite and high rollers, that the fast pass machines in the parks will still be used for everyone else. In other words, we all get some benefit from fast pass, just some of us get more than others. And that would be fairer than out and out discriminating between on and off site guests.
All in all, this is one of those things that we have to see in practice before we can critique it. Disney is toying with all sorts of ideas to one-up the competition and keep people onsite. Some things work, some don't...and I think it is pretty much trial and error right now.
And, like Forest, that's all I'm going to say about that!