Yes. Because if they had used the FP earlier in the day, the line would have been backed up that much more.
Nope, SB self regulates itself and you do not know who would get into this line. We do not stand in one long line.
Yes. Because if they had used the FP earlier in the day, the line would have been backed up that much more.
You seriously beleive, looking deep down, not even admitting to board but to yourself that late FPer did not affect anyone? That somehow when late FPer was going infront of SB, time was frosen?
Star Trek material. Remarkable.
Thank you for providing those.
Do you have an opinion why Disney just didnt widely promote the non-FP enforcement? As in notify guests in their literature and on their signage.
If Disney really wanted everyone to take advantage of this, why did they still print beginning and ending times on the FP tickets?
(although I know we used them after the 1 hour window frequently)Let me sit down my Poms Poms for a second here....
Another benefit I see and this is admittedly in my selfish point of view is that it cuts down on guests acting as proxy FP distributors.
Just curious, how is it saving you $400-$500 per day? In two table service meals? They cost that much? Or was this a joke?
Thanks.
We're now debating the same point on 2 different threads, but as explained on the other one this would not be a problem because it would fix itself. Even of those who knew they could use late, not everyone did as evidenced by the people on these boards who are accusing the late users of being rule breakers. Further, in an extreme example where everyone uses late than the SB line goes quicker.
Very few have accused late users of being rule breakers. They were doing what Disney allowed. That is just a paranoid look at it. Even if Disney, on occasion, let it slip that they allowed FP later then the window, they never officially changed it on the FP ticket did they. It become very gray because since Disney allowed it to happen it no longer was "breaking" any rules because they now allowed it. They just didn't tell everyone about it, officially.
This is wrong - as explained above anyone with a window ahead of when you get in the SB line is already in line ahead of you. If they used in their window then the line you are standing in would be that much longer, you just wouldn't actually see those people. You perceive to be waiting longer but the reality is that you aren't. Those people you see at 9pm would have rode at 4pm taking up ride capacity and pushing the lines out by 20 people.
This is a handy little argument but it is just smoke and mirrors. If someone has a FP for 3 PM to 4 PM they are "virtually" in the line only during that time. So if you are in the line at the same time...they are ahead of you or they could be behind you depending on when they showed up. You would have to assume that the line never catches up to make that carry over to a later time. If someone with that FP decides to not use it until 6 PM they then become part of the actual line at 6 PM and only affect SB at that time. By theory, they should have been in and gone hours ago thus not making any difference to the 6 PM stand by. I will grant that the SB line went quicker between 3 and 4 because they weren't there. It is completely different people that are brought into the mix later.
Possibly in part, but this cannot be proven. What can be proven is that under the old system you could ride to your heart's content and never wait in lines, and this opportunity was open to anyone in the park.
Nope, SB self regulates itself and you do not know who would get into this line. We do not stand in one long line.
I always followed the time on the ticket anyway so it's the same for us. If we couldn't make the time, we'd give them away to someone who could.
Same here. I think the main problem here is sense of entitlement. The Fast Pass has always had a return time range when you were supposed to return. Some people just felt that that time didn't apply to them and that they could return whenever they felt like it. Most people didn't even realize that they could return after the range had expired and just threw away their fast passes. This way is fair to everybody. If you cannot return during the hour-long window, do not get a fast pass or simply give it to someone who can use it.
And just how is it a sense of etitlement if the CM tells you you can return any time after the window as long as it's that day....... and that's what they did?
I know there have been aproximately 9,458 threads on this very topic in the past 2 months......... but I still marvel at this amazingly judgmental way of thinking.
Please take the time with an open mind to think this through.
When I first found out about late FP use, I had the same reaction as you - that it was slowing down the SB line. People showed me that I was wrong and I changed by stance.
Scenerio 1: I get a FP for TSM with a window of 10am to 11am. You get in the TSM SB line at 11am. If I return within my window you are behind me in line. If I return to use my FP late (say 6pm) you are ahead of me in line when you should have been behind me. As a SB rider you just benefitted from late FP use and get on the ride sooner.
Scenerio 2: I get a FP for TSM with a window of 10am to 11am. You get in the TSM SB line at 6pm. I come at 6:01 and get in the FP line and walk by you and ride TSM ahead of you. If I came within my window of 10 to 11am, I would also have riden ahead of you - either way you ride after me and are behind me in line and no one was affected.
When you see someone use a FP late, your instinct is to think you were wronged because you physically see that person walk ahead of you in line, but if that person rode within their window they still would have been ahead of you in line, moving the SB line back by 1 person (the rides operate at capacity) - you just would have never seen that person. The fact that you see the person feeds to your perception that they are increasing your wait time when in reality they arent.
In either case you were not affected negatively, and in scenerio 1 you were actually affected positively.
We're now debating the same point on 2 different threads, but as explained on the other one this would not be a problem because it would fix itself. Even of those who knew they could use late, not everyone did as evidenced by the people on these boards who are accusing the late users of being rule breakers. Further, in an extreme example where everyone uses late than the SB line goes quicker.
Nope, a fixed number of riders could ride in a given day. Anyone pulling a FP was already ahead of you in line if you get in either line after their window. The fact that you would not have seen that person in line if they used during their window does not mean that they were not ahead of you. On the flipside, you may actually benefit from late usage because when that was allowed people who pulled FP with return times did not come back within their window, and if you got in line in the meantime they essentially let you pass them in line.
FP supply is not impacted by enforcement - if WDW decides to increase supply it is at the sacrifice of the SB rider (fewer). FP demand may be slightly impacted by enforcement, but if your argument is that only 10% of people knew about late returns, and acknowedge that a portion of those who knew still used within their window, then really you've defeated that argument yourself because there wouldn't be enough people deferring use because of the policy change to impact demand.
This is wrong - as explained above anyone with a window ahead of when you get in the SB line is already in line ahead of you. If they used in their window then the line you are standing in would be that much longer, you just wouldn't actually see those people. You perceive to be waiting longer but the reality is that you aren't. Those people you see at 9pm would have rode at 4pm taking up ride capacity and pushing the lines out by 20 people.
Possibly in part, but this cannot be proven. What can be proven is that under the old system you could ride to your heart's content and never wait in lines, and this opportunity was open to anyone in the park.
Do not forget SB line self regulates, many do not enter 40 min line but will enter 20 min line, but with late FP, SB is out of control and 20 min can easily turn into 40, esp. on cycle rides like Soarin. Now do not forget tht I also have ADRs and now I have to run across the park with my family just because someone decided they can benefit at my expense.
Using that same logic, wouldn't there also be times when the FP riders SHOULD have been in line but aren't? Thereby making the wait shorter then it should have been? So now those SB riders walk up and see an acceptable wait time.

And how I benefit from this 11 AM shorter line if I entered part at 2PM?![]()
Same here. I think the main problem here is sense of entitlement. The Fast Pass has always had a return time range when you were supposed to return. Some people just felt that that time didn't apply to them and that they could return whenever they felt like it. Most people didn't even realize that they could return after the range had expired and just threw away their fast passes. This way is fair to everybody. If you cannot return during the hour-long window, do not get a fast pass or simply give it to someone who can use it.
How do you benefit from anything that occurs when you are not present?
Same here. I think the main problem here is sense of entitlement. The Fast Pass has always had a return time range when you were supposed to return. Some people just felt that that time didn't apply to them and that they could return whenever they felt like it.
Now people are angry that we are all going to be forced to follow the same rules and that they can't do as the please like that have in the past. They don't think the rules should apply to them. That is a sense of entitlement - the belief that certain rules shouldn't have to apply to them.
You are placing judgment on those that used late fastpasses as having a sense of entitlement? How presumptuous of you!, and just plain incorrect. You don't know me, yet you say I have a sense of entitlement because I used FP's after the 1 hour window? 
That was my question to you.
This is a very judgemental response.
I frequently used FP late - because I was allowed to, just as every other park goer was. I never felt entitled - those were the rules which were commonly and widely acknowledged by the employees of the company. In three week long trips I was never once told by a CM that I could not ride because I was late, nor was it ever suggested that this was outside of the policy.
There were never two sets of rules - this would imply that people were treated differently. There may have been two different understandings of the rules, and there is a big difference between these two points. For instance, tax law allows you to deduct home mortgage interest, and this deduction is open to everyone. If you don't know about the home mortgage interest deduction and you don't claim it on your tax return, that does not imply that there are two sets of rules.
It's your responsibility to learn the accepted rules and be an informed consumer. It's not my responsibility as an informed consumer to make sure that everyone else is informed.
I continue to post on these threads mainly because I strongly feel that WDW did a disservice to the park goer in making this change. They took a rule that wasn't broke, worked very well and wasn't negatively impacting anyone and changed it such that it will most definately impact our trip and make it less enjoyable. I do not post because I feel entitled to anything - it's their park and they make the rules.
This is a very judgemental response.
I frequently used FP late - because I was allowed to, just as every other park goer was. I never felt entitled - those were the rules which were commonly and widely acknowledged by the employees of the company. In three week long trips I was never once told by a CM that I could not ride because I was late, nor was it ever suggested that this was outside of the policy.
There were never two sets of rules - this would imply that people were treated differently. There may have been two different understandings of the rules, and there is a big difference between these two points. For instance, tax law allows you to deduct home mortgage interest, and this deduction is open to everyone. If you don't know about the home mortgage interest deduction and you don't claim it on your tax return, that does not imply that there are two sets of rules.
It's your responsibility to learn the accepted rules and be an informed consumer. It's not my responsibility as an informed consumer to make sure that everyone else is informed.
I continue to post on these threads mainly because I strongly feel that WDW did a disservice to the park goer in making this change. They took a rule that wasn't broke, worked very well and wasn't negatively impacting anyone and changed it such that it will most definately impact our trip and make it less enjoyable. I do not post because I feel entitled to anything - it's their park and they make the rules.
This is a very judgemental response.
I frequently used FP late - because I was allowed to, just as every other park goer was. I never felt entitled - those were the rules which were commonly and widely acknowledged by the employees of the company. In three week long trips I was never once told by a CM that I could not ride because I was late, nor was it ever suggested that this was outside of the policy.
There were never two sets of rules - this would imply that people were treated differently. There may have been two different understandings of the rules, and there is a big difference between these two points. For instance, tax law allows you to deduct home mortgage interest, and this deduction is open to everyone. If you don't know about the home mortgage interest deduction and you don't claim it on your tax return, that does not imply that there are two sets of rules.
It's your responsibility to learn the accepted rules and be an informed consumer. It's not my responsibility as an informed consumer to make sure that everyone else is informed.
I continue to post on these threads mainly because I strongly feel that WDW did a disservice to the park goer in making this change. They took a rule that wasn't broke, worked very well and wasn't negatively impacting anyone and changed it such that it will most definately impact our trip and make it less enjoyable. I do not post because I feel entitled to anything - it's their park and they make the rules.