Fellowship9798
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2005
- Messages
- 602
Just another question for all you knowledgeable and helpful people out there. It seems to be the common advice that DVC is worth it if you are going at least once every 1-2 years and staying in moderates or deluxes. For those located on the west coast, the cost and expense of travel out to Florida is greater, plus a lot more hassle with the time difference, at least compared with those of you in driving distance. Bascially multiple short trips per year aren't as feasible.
What are the thoughts on the financial viability of DVC for taking loger trips (say 2 weeks) every three years. As DVC really only covers accomodations, this helps spread the high cost of admissions, car rental, etc. over a longer period.
I can't see a big obvious difference in financial terms between banking and borrowing for a 2 week trip every three years vs. a one week trip 2 out of every 3 years or a 1.5 week trip every other year, or a 4-5 day trip every year. Of course you can get very technical and talk about lost interest on annual dues for years your're not actually travelling, but in the big picture it seems to be pretty similar.
Can anyone poke holes in this logic for me? My wife and I are just about over the cusp of deciding to buy, but the longer travel time with small children from the west coast plus a reluctance to be entirely "locked in" to only going to WDW every year are the road blocks, so I'm looking at an extreme scenario out of curiosity. We wouldn't exchange points for other II resorts as it just doesn't seem an efficient use of points/money. Actually I would love to be locked into WDW every year, but there is something to be said for variety now and then, like maybe a trip to Disneyland instead
. If and when they open a DVC resort there, things will be much easier.
So who has some thoughts on the financial sense of a long trip every 3years vs.shorter trips every 1-2 years? Does it make a difference or work out the same in your opinion?
(Although from reading these boards I know that once DVC sucks you in you just start going more and more...)
What are the thoughts on the financial viability of DVC for taking loger trips (say 2 weeks) every three years. As DVC really only covers accomodations, this helps spread the high cost of admissions, car rental, etc. over a longer period.
I can't see a big obvious difference in financial terms between banking and borrowing for a 2 week trip every three years vs. a one week trip 2 out of every 3 years or a 1.5 week trip every other year, or a 4-5 day trip every year. Of course you can get very technical and talk about lost interest on annual dues for years your're not actually travelling, but in the big picture it seems to be pretty similar.
Can anyone poke holes in this logic for me? My wife and I are just about over the cusp of deciding to buy, but the longer travel time with small children from the west coast plus a reluctance to be entirely "locked in" to only going to WDW every year are the road blocks, so I'm looking at an extreme scenario out of curiosity. We wouldn't exchange points for other II resorts as it just doesn't seem an efficient use of points/money. Actually I would love to be locked into WDW every year, but there is something to be said for variety now and then, like maybe a trip to Disneyland instead

So who has some thoughts on the financial sense of a long trip every 3years vs.shorter trips every 1-2 years? Does it make a difference or work out the same in your opinion?
(Although from reading these boards I know that once DVC sucks you in you just start going more and more...)