DVC T &C Personal Use - Only Thread to Discuss.

So you're saying owners don't always look for a studio but non owners renting always do?

Not sure I'd buy that narrative.
Commercial renters almost always do choose studios. If someone wants to pay crazy high per point price for a 1BR or something I'm sure they will oblige. But they take studios at a significantly higher rate than the average member. If you don't believe that then I don't know what to tell you. There is a reason that most of the standing reservations up for rent from the commercial rentals are studios, they make the most money
 
So you're saying owners don't always look for a studio but non owners renting always do?

Not sure I'd buy that narrative.
I have surely rented a 2br, but most of the rentals I have done are studios.

ETA:
To be honest if renters wanted 1br or GV then members would book and rent that.
 
Based on the comments in this thread, it seems that the main problem that the majority of people here have is with "spec" rentals grapping and holding rooms, then seeing those rooms for rent at some online site while they can't book the room themselves. I totally get that this is extremely annoying!

The question then comes down to how to stop that?

Spec rentals basically require the owner to make a lead name change on the reservation. While there are a few owners or the occasional time that an owner does need to make a name change on a "real" reservation I can't image that they would need to do this a lot throughout the year. So would limiting the number of times an owner could make lead name changes on a reservation cut that down? Would 1-2 name changes a year work for most legit lead name changes but be enough to stop those commercial renter from doing it at volume?

Similarly with walking, why not limit a reservation to X number of date changes before you then have to cancel it and rebook? If the goal is to stop people from walking for months at a time you would think this should be easy to implement and stop.

Why hasn't DVC done things like this already? Or are things now so bad that DVC is getting effected and maybe they will do something to curb spec renting and walking.

It will be interesting to see if they say anything else in the meeting today(?).
 

Yes and no. I have seen people here struggle with page after page of inquiries on the rent/trade board, just to get $18pp on their OKW points that have $10 dues. Pages of handholding, availability requests, and deals not made. Might rather cut lawns.

When I had 18pts BW and 13 were very inconvenient for us to use, I poked into the RAT and found/booked a Mon & Tues night ~10 months (iirc) out. Waited until about 5 months out to list. It sat for a couple months. Plan B was lower to $350/nt if not sold before 2 month mark, but ended up selling 3 months out. $153 dues paid, $531 cleared. Broker tacked on another $5pp plus somewhere around $35 transaction fee. They cleared almost $120 on the 2 nights. I previously forgotten about that fee. Just looked and it sold at $45 per point, May 2024 9pt/nt.

Effort - Very Little: A couple minutes to fill a short form - name/contact info, res#, resort, price wanted. They called me to let me know the $pp was high. I confirmed yes, leave it, lol. A few months later I recv’d email, changed lead/guest names via chat, received payment via 2 electronic checks. Would you rather cut 10 lawns or take less than an hour total of your time to type a few times on a keyboard?

I don’t mean to harp what might seem like a unicorn rental. People are scoffing at $25pp rentals like it’s not reality. Tons of rentals are getting $30 to $40pp, even as high as $45pp.

For me and anyone else, there is no going back once you get your toes wet. Ease. Profit. I’ll look at the RAT and pluck the best current day(s) possible by their profit potential, with no regard if 2 days or Sept doesn’t cut it for me… I have the whole world to find a match. If I think something better’s possible, maybe even try waitlist.

The bigger point is pattern of use. This spec rental market exploded after being normalized post-covid. The main purpose of that activity is to find the highest profit margin bookings first, so you can sell them. On top of an already vibrant traditional rental market. If an owner holds many points and slamming spec rentals with yearly, how is someone going to defend it as personal use? I’m pretty sure DVC wants this junk gone yesterday. It doesn’t take much imagination to see the outsized impact that behavior brings to the system.

The thinking DVC applied in 2008 was 2 decades ago. Much has changed. Remember it is their sandbox. We discuss the finer points of the contract and individual examples, but doesn’t the entire contract matter? If one point is ambiguous, does it persist through the entire contract? And what else does the contract say?

DVC has been pushed to define how far rentals may go, and they left us to decide for ourselves after the reading the contract. Sounds to me like they want members to determine their own risk, and leave as much legal flexibility for themselves as possible. A slick way for DVC to continue holding the cards, because they have never come close to saying commercial use is allowed. It’s DVC’s sandbox. They get to run it.

Last year they said it ‘wasn’t widespread’. For all we know just another statement to protect themselves legally. What specifically was that regarding? Then try to define widespread 😂

Having been there, I can tell you the impression they were trying to give the owners.

They would be taking action against the large point owners out there who were causing the bulk of the problems but to reassure that it wasn’t widespread…implying to many of us…talked to others after the meeting…that it was a few bad players causing the bulk of the issues.
 
Based on the comments in this thread, it seems that the main problem that the majority of people here have is with "spec" rentals grapping and holding rooms, then seeing those rooms for rent at some online site while they can't book the room themselves. I totally get that this is extremely annoying!

The question then comes down to how to stop that?

Spec rentals basically require the owner to make a lead name change on the reservation. While there are a few owners or the occasional time that an owner does need to make a name change on a "real" reservation I can't image that they would need to do this a lot throughout the year. So would limiting the number of times an owner could make lead name changes on a reservation cut that down? Would 1-2 name changes a year work for most legit lead name changes but be enough to stop those commercial renter from doing it at volume?

Similarly with walking, why not limit a reservation to X number of date changes before you then have to cancel it and rebook? If the goal is to stop people from walking for months at a time you would think this should be easy to implement and stop.

Why hasn't DVC done things like this already? Or are things now so bad that DVC is getting effected and maybe they will do something to curb spec renting and walking.

It will be interesting to see if they say anything else in the meeting today(?).

The flexibility to change names was part of my comments at the meeting last year and they stated it’s rule changes that would impact this that they want to be very careful about.

IMO, I am not sure they need to make such black and white rules.

I am really hoping that what they will do is look for patterns with an owners and take it from there.

I can think of so many situations where an owner may need to change the name of a reservation.

If someone is doing this for a commercial purpose, it’s going to be evident by the activity you have on your account, including if you are changing lead guests names frequently.

The other part that I think has played a role in the ease of booking is the online system.

Before that, you had to call to not only book, but to know what was even open.

You weren’t going on and grabbing a one night room in an AKV CL room to spec rent.

Now, it’s easy to go on and book something to offer.

It’s posted earlier in the thread that reports are that DVC has updated the system to identify memberships that have a certain % of reservations in the names of others.
 
Last edited:
Before that, you had to call to not only book, but to know what was even open.
I never even thought about this - the fact the owners couldn’t see what was open to book before the online system was around.

This surely has a huge role in people grabbing rooms speculatively. I know I have occasionally seen nights pop up for hard-to-get rooms and thought ‘ooo, I’ll grab those in case I can use them’. Usually I just cancel and release back in to the system, as they don’t line up with my plans. But I bet there are a huge number of people that would rent the res if it commanded a high enough price per point.

This wasn’t an issue at all in the days of having to call to check what was available.
 
I never even thought about this - the fact the owners couldn’t see what was open to book before the online system was around.

This surely has a huge role in people grabbing rooms speculatively. I know I have occasionally seen nights pop up for hard-to-get rooms and thought ‘ooo, I’ll grab those in case I can use them’. Usually I just cancel and release back in to the system, as they don’t line up with my plans. But I bet there are a huge number of people that would rent the res if it commanded a high enough price per point.

This wasn’t an issue at all in the days of having to call to check what was available.
Yep. Whenever I see a few days at a value or club room at AKV I grab them, then I have a hard time letting them go if I can't use them. It's tough
 
Yes and no. I have seen people here struggle with page after page of inquiries on the rent/trade board, just to get $18pp on their OKW points that have $10 dues. Pages of handholding, availability requests, and deals not made. Might rather cut lawns.

When I had 18pts BW and 13 were very inconvenient for us to use, I poked into the RAT and found/booked a Mon & Tues night ~10 months (iirc) out. Waited until about 5 months out to list. It sat for a couple months. Plan B was lower to $350/nt if not sold before 2 month mark, but ended up selling 3 months out. $153 dues paid, $531 cleared. Broker tacked on another $5pp plus somewhere around $35 transaction fee. They cleared almost $120 on the 2 nights. I previously forgotten about that fee. Just looked and it sold at $45 per point, May 2024 9pt/nt.

Effort - Very Little: A couple minutes to fill a short form - name/contact info, res#, resort, price wanted. They called me to let me know the $pp was high. I confirmed yes, leave it, lol. A few months later I recv’d email, changed lead/guest names via chat, received payment via 2 electronic checks. Would you rather cut 10 lawns or take less than an hour total of your time to type a few times on a keyboard?

I don’t mean to harp what might seem like a unicorn rental. People are scoffing at $25pp rentals like it’s not reality. Tons of rentals are getting $30 to $40pp, even as high as $45pp.

For me and anyone else, there is no going back once you get your toes wet. Ease. Profit. I’ll look at the RAT and pluck the best current day(s) possible by their profit potential, with no regard if 2 days or Sept doesn’t cut it for me… I have the whole world to find a match. If I think something better’s possible, maybe even try waitlist.

The bigger point is pattern of use. This spec rental market exploded after being normalized post-covid. The main purpose of that activity is to find the highest profit margin bookings first, so you can sell them. On top of an already vibrant traditional rental market. If an owner holds many points and slamming spec rentals with yearly, how is someone going to defend it as personal use? I’m pretty sure DVC wants this junk gone yesterday. It doesn’t take much imagination to see the outsized impact that behavior brings to the system.

The thinking DVC applied in 2008 was 2 decades ago. Much has changed. Remember it is their sandbox. We discuss the finer points of the contract and individual examples, but doesn’t the entire contract matter? If one point is ambiguous, does it persist through the entire contract? And what else does the contract say?

DVC has been pushed to define how far rentals may go, and they left us to decide for ourselves after the reading the contract. Sounds to me like they want members to determine their own risk, and leave as much legal flexibility for themselves as possible. A slick way for DVC to continue holding the cards, because they have never come close to saying commercial use is allowed. It’s DVC’s sandbox. They get to run it.

Last year they said it ‘wasn’t widespread’. For all we know just another statement to protect themselves legally. What specifically was that regarding? Then try to define widespread 😂
Did you pay your federal taxes? Both the California state tax and the rental tax each are 6% of the total amount so that’s $45 not the amount you got per point. And then of course pay your state income tax.

And if you do electronic you may even have to pay for additional forms if you use TurboTax

I recommend other software by the way.

Your actual profit is much much less. I figured it out the other day while this discussion was going. I made $600. Of a last-minute emergency rental of a boardwalk two bedroom at 285 points. So my $20 point turned into $600 profit. I doubt anyone here would give up 285 boardwalk points to make $600. I spend more than $600 in food during the week at Disney. I would much rather have those three weeks of studio.
 
One trend I am noticing here is that because certain posters don’t know how to get $30/pt in income, they don’t realize that many, many others are renting exclusively above that price point.

I would hope that all of us could agree that always using half or more of your DVC points to try to get $35/pt or more each year is a commercial enterprise.
 
I never even thought about this - the fact the owners couldn’t see what was open to book before the online system was around.

This surely has a huge role in people grabbing rooms speculatively. I know I have occasionally seen nights pop up for hard-to-get rooms and thought ‘ooo, I’ll grab those in case I can use them’. Usually I just cancel and release back in to the system, as they don’t line up with my plans. But I bet there are a huge number of people that would rent the res if it commanded a high enough price per point.

This wasn’t an issue at all in the days of having to call to check what was available.

It dawned on me today and how that ability with how easy it is.and, when you see how many one night rooms are being offered it seems clear to me those are being snapped up via stalking!

Even if you go back to the 2008 policy…you were calling to book and they would see how many reservations you had…they would only confirm the new booking if you were under 20.

So, they really did have the ability to monitor. Once online happened, that’s when they began flagging accounts because nothing prevented owners from booking more than 20.
 
One trend I am noticing here is that because certain posters don’t know how to get $30/pt in income, they don’t realize that many, many others are renting exclusively above that price point.

I would hope that all of us could agree that always using half or more of your DVC points to try to get $35/pt or more each year is a commercial enterprise.
For someone to pay $30+ per point would suggest this individual is unaware of this site or any other DVC site where members openly and very publicly disclose a price per point FAR below $30. How is it such a person found a DVC owner to rent from but somehow missed the very forum DVC owners converse on?
 
One trend I am noticing here is that because certain posters don’t know how to get $30/pt in income, they don’t realize that many, many others are renting exclusively above that price point.

I would hope that all of us could agree that always using half or more of your DVC points to try to get $35/pt or more each year is a commercial enterprise.

I still believe that the number of points owned should play a role (200 point owner doing something vs a 2000 point owner) but help me to tease this out.

Are you saying that DVC would use the potential market price that could be charged?

Or, DVC would base it in the actual rate an owner is charging by requiring them to submit rental agreements? DVC then uses those to make the decision?

If it’s the latter, then it seems like a reasonable approach and would seem to be in line with the contract in which terms of a rental contract are up to the owner.
 
Last edited:
For someone to pay $30+ per point would suggest this individual is unaware of this site or any other DVC site where members openly and very publicly disclose a price per point FAR below $30. How is it such a person found a DVC owner to rent from but somehow missed the very forum DVC owners converse on?
For the dates that this works for, studios will be mostly unavailable right after the 11 month window for members renting their points on demand to go and book them. Their choice will be to pay $30 per point for a confirmed reservation for a studio or 18-20 per point on a 1BR which is around double the points as a studio. The studio at $30 per point is still cheaper than renting the 1BR still available (if there are any available) or a hotel room direct from Disney, so they take it. This doesn't work for all the seasons, just during the popular times at popular resorts with low point cost studios
 
For someone to pay $30+ per point would suggest this individual is unaware of this site or any other DVC site where members openly and very publicly disclose a price per point FAR below $30. How is it such a person found a DVC owner to rent from but somehow missed the very forum DVC owners converse on?

Because there are so many cash guests who learn about DVC rentals but no nothing about DVC other than the rooms can be cheaper than booking with Disney.

That is what they compare it to. The number of Disney loving fans who don’t frequent message boards and forums is vast.

Guests renting reservations are not typically DVC owners.
 
So you're saying owners don't always look for a studio but non owners renting always do?
When it comes to spec rentals: if they don't they are foolish, because studios have the largest gap between points cost and market rental rates.

I'm going to guess that the vast majority of them are not foolish.

For someone to pay $30+ per point would suggest this individual is unaware of this site or any other DVC site where members openly and very publicly disclose a price per point FAR below $30. How is it such a person found a DVC owner to rent from but somehow missed the very forum DVC owners converse on?
Au contraire mon frere. Two points here.

First, a lot of people are going to rent through the (heavily advertised) broker sites and not DIS for a whole host of reasons, not the least of which is, well, they advertise and DISboards' Rent/Trade board doesn't. You can't swing a dead cat in the online Disney universe without seeing or hearing an ad for one of them. Try listening to Sorcerer Radio for an hour and see how many ads you hear.

Second, and more importantly: The real money is spec rentals offered at resorts that are otherwise sold out for points-based bookings. You are then competing against whatever Disney is able to get for market rents, not some individual owner offering at $18 per.

It is amusing that someone who is paying to advertise their point rentals on DIS claims to not know how the rental ecosystem works. But, you did only join a year ago, so I guess there's a learning curve.
 
I still believe that the number of points owned should play a role (200 point owner doing something vs a 2000 point owner) but help me to tease this out.
I agree with you in principle, but where the rubber hits the road is if you limit it at say 400 points, some people will set up a few different entities that each have 350-399 points— Yes, there are a few giant entities, but there are dozens of people renting 1000-10,000 points a year in this manner who would be incentivized to find some shell owners if there are no rules below a certain threshold.
Are you saying that DVC would use the potential market price that could be charged?
Honestly, given current technology they could probably scrape the major listing sites and social media pages and actually determine what people are trying to rent for with very limited human effort, that would be the most accurate—but I also think they could say that any rooms less than say 25 points per night cannot be spec rented, it would nip the problem in the bud if you can only change names on a confirmed reservation for the less profitable categories. By zeroing in on the area there is clear abuse, they could limit high profit rentals. Nobody is making $30/night renting 1Bed at most (all?) resorts.
Or, DVC would base it in the actual rate an owner is charging by requiring them to submit rental agreements? DVC then uses those to make the decision?

If it’s the latter, then it seems like a reasonable approach and would seem to be in line with the contract in which terms of a rental contract are up to the owner.
I would be ok side, but the issue with this approach is that it’s very labor intensive for Disney.

I still think their primary concern is not having cheap studios undercutting bookings at deluxe and moderate resorts. So stopping all spec renting and especially spec renting of low point rooms is cleanest with minimal effort.
 
For the dates that this works for, studios will be mostly unavailable right after the 11 month window for members renting their points on demand to go and book them. Their choice will be to pay $30 per point for a confirmed reservation for a studio or 18-20 per point on a 1BR which is around double the points as a studio. The studio at $30 per point is still cheaper than renting the 1BR still available (if there are any available) or a hotel room direct from Disney, so they take it. This doesn't work for all the seasons, just during the popular times at popular resorts with low point cost studios
I have seen people advertising rooms for such a high price that the cash side would be better as long as you had at least one of the discounts. Right now if you wanted to go this summer, it would be cheaper to buy an AP and get the AP rate for boardwalk and then rent some of the listings on the scalper sites.
 
One trend I am noticing here is that because certain posters don’t know how to get $30/pt in income, they don’t realize that many, many others are renting exclusively above that price point.

I would hope that all of us could agree that always using half or more of your DVC points to try to get $35/pt or more each year is a commercial enterprise.
I’m aware of the people who scalp reservations. But just like sites that scalp event tickets I won’t participate or give them my business. If I have to rent points, I’m either going to put them on the board below for 18- 20 a point or I’m going to list them on the board sponsor for $20 a point or less.
 
When it comes to spec rentals: if they don't they are foolish, because studios have the largest gap between points cost and market rental rates.

I'm going to guess that the vast majority of them are not foolish.


Au contraire mon frere. Two points here.

First, a lot of people are going to rent through the (heavily advertised) broker sites and not DIS for a whole host of reasons, not the least of which is, well, they advertise and DISboards' Rent/Trade board doesn't. You can't swing a dead cat in the online Disney universe without seeing or hearing an ad for one of them. Try listening to Sorcerer Radio for an hour and see how many ads you hear.

Second, and more importantly: The real money is spec rentals offered at resorts that are otherwise sold out for points-based bookings. You are then competing against whatever Disney is able to get for market rents, not some individual owner offering at $18 per.

It is amusing that someone who is paying to advertise their point rentals on DIS claims to not know how the rental ecosystem works. But, you did only join a year ago, so I guess there's a learning curve.
I'm either not a true die hard Disney fanatic or I'm too busy but either way, I've not once listened to Sorcerer Radio or have seen/heard of ANY DVC rental ads anywhere outside of this and one other forum.

I have not looked at what Disney charges for rooms beyond the period when we were buying and only then, to confirm ownership was a greater value as a whole than paying Disney's nightly rate.

We didn't buy points with the intent to rent them so I didn't spend any time looking into that side of DVC. As timing would have it, my wife decided to go back to college for her Masters which means a lot less free time for Disney. It's a 3 year program and coordinating her breaks with those of our kids from their school means at best we will have two trips per year. This will put points in jeopardy if not rented since we can't bank but one year.

There is a steep learning curve and frankly, I may never undertake it since I'm not interested in becoming a commercial renter and while I'd like 30 per point, I am unwilling to swim in those waters lest I get eaten by the sharks there. I am sure those commercial renters are protective of their space!! It will take Disney to deal with them.
 



New Posts

















DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top