Yes and no. I have seen people here struggle with page after page of inquiries on the rent/trade board, just to get $18pp on their OKW points that have $10 dues. Pages of handholding, availability requests, and deals not made. Might rather cut lawns.
When I had 18pts BW and 13 were very inconvenient for us to use, I poked into the RAT and found/booked a Mon & Tues night ~10 months (iirc) out. Waited until about 5 months out to list. It sat for a couple months. Plan B was lower to $350/nt if not sold before 2 month mark, but ended up selling 3 months out. $153 dues paid, $531 cleared. Broker tacked on another $5pp plus somewhere around $35 transaction fee. They cleared almost $120 on the 2 nights. I previously forgotten about that fee. Just looked and it
sold at $45 per point, May
2024 9pt/nt.
Effort - Very Little: A couple minutes to fill a short form - name/contact info, res#, resort, price wanted. They called me to let me know the $pp was high. I confirmed yes, leave it, lol. A few months later I recv’d email, changed lead/guest names via chat, received payment via 2 electronic checks. Would you rather cut 10 lawns or take less than an hour total of your time to type a few times on a keyboard?
I don’t mean to harp what might seem like a unicorn rental. People are scoffing at $25pp rentals like it’s not reality. Tons of rentals are getting $30 to $40pp, even as high as $45pp.
For me and anyone else, there is no going back once you get your toes wet. Ease. Profit. I’ll look at the RAT and pluck the
best current day(s) possible by their profit potential, with no regard if 2 days or Sept doesn’t cut it for me… I have the whole world to find a match. If I think something better’s possible, maybe even try waitlist.
The bigger point is
pattern of use. This spec rental market exploded after being normalized post-covid. The main purpose of that activity is to find the highest profit margin bookings first, so you can sell them. On top of an already vibrant traditional rental market. If an owner holds many points and slamming spec rentals with yearly, how is someone going to defend it as personal use? I’m pretty sure
DVC wants this junk gone yesterday. It doesn’t take much imagination to see the outsized impact that behavior brings to the system.
The thinking DVC applied in 2008 was 2 decades ago. Much has changed. Remember it is their sandbox. We discuss the finer points of the contract and individual examples, but doesn’t the entire contract matter? If one point is ambiguous, does it persist through the
entire contract? And what
else does the contract say?
DVC has been pushed to define how far rentals may go, and they left us to decide for ourselves after the reading the contract. Sounds to me like they want members to determine their own risk, and leave as much legal flexibility for themselves as possible. A slick way for DVC to continue holding the cards, because they have never come close to saying commercial use is allowed. It’s DVC’s sandbox. They get to run it.
Last year they said it ‘wasn’t widespread’. For all we know just another statement to protect themselves legally. What specifically was that regarding? Then try to define widespread