SDMT seems more like a suspended coaster than an inverted coaster.
Here's a picture of the suspended coaster Iron Dragon at Cedar Point...as you can see, the vehicles still swing. Big Bad Wolf at Busch Gardens was another suspended coaster. The swinging definitely adds an interesting element to the ride experience.
![]()
Or like Pteranadon Flyers at Islands of Adventure which swings from side to side.
![]()
Both of these suspended vehicles still swing around the corners. The point of suspension is just higher than it will be on SDMT.
With an inverted coaster like Dragon Challenge, there is no actual swinging.
Disney's tactics are evidence that are trying to incentivise guests to stay on property and visit Disney parks by secondary means and Universal's tactics seem to be more primary...."come to Universal for this attraction".
Yeah, Disney has the Fantasyland expansion, but it hasn't that much in the way of attractions. Maybe Avatarland and Carsland will change some of that.
Maybe it's just me, but I sense a LOT of anticipation for the Drawf Mine Train. I think it's been a long while since Disney dropped an awesome ride on us (this while US has done HP) and it feels like there is a pent up hunger for something really cool.
And it seems like everyone is waiting for DMT, and even though we know it's a kids coaster (given placement in Fantasyland) I still feel like people are unconsciously anticipating something awesome.
I know that I can't quite help myself and sort of unconsciously am expecting something really cool.
Could it be crazy amazing? Yes.
But that seems unlikely.
I wonder if we're just setting ourselves up for disappointment by expecting too much.
As it is, I expect nothing more than a goofy rollercoaster that goes in and out of a mine which plays music from the movie and has giant jewels on the walls, broken track here and there, maybe a witch with a red apple here or there, and rocks back and forth a little bit.
Why in the world does Disney making something crazy amazing seem unlikely? I'm not following that logic at all, but it could just be because I find a LOT of what Disney does crazy amazing. If your definition of "crazy amazing" is RnRC, then maybe not so much in Fantasyland.![]()
I just had a mental image of the dwarfs dancing around like the multiplicity oompaloompas in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.![]()
I am wondering if we will be let down. They have tough thing to pull off. They want to make it cool but in order to do they need to add excitement, But too much and it is going to scare children. It seems really tough to pull off. I was wondering if Universal was planning on doing Mine ride. With them building Gringots I would kind of figure that mind ride would be the attraction. They have such advantage as it can be for older audience.
Sounds awesome!![]()
Hi Ppl
alot of people keep saying MK is in need of a thrill ride, i dont think so, MK dosnt scream thrill rides to me, its about the stories and the magic to me anyways.
i always think thrill rides belong at Universal Studios. Disney needs to stick to what has worked since opening, look at jungle cruise, pirates of the carribbean, peter pan, Its a small world, haunted mansion, their all rides with audio animatronic dark rides some with a slight thrill aspect which make it intresting. thatys what disney does best, rides for everyone for every age.
just my 0.2c anyways
Yes, this.If people were going to Disney mainly for thrill rides, the park would have tumbleweeds rolling through it by now. People go for the "Disney experience" more than for specific rides.