Doctor Dies From Allergic Reaction After Raglan Road Meal at Disney Springs

[RivShore]

The "agreement" was made on Uber Eats ( food delivery) but applied to a ride share traffic accident. Not related, JMO

The pop up agreement was made by a minor.

I thought it said they had used uber rides in the past so they must have agreed to that too.

The minor thing is impossible to prove but the bottom line is no one is reading the 100 pages of t&c's and you have no way to opt of of a clause you don't like...and in many cases, you can't use the service without the app, so they trap consumers. Something has to change...

 

[Lewisc]

I thought it said they had used uber rides in the past so they must have agreed to that too.

The article was revised since I posted. The revision suggests they "agreed" to the arbitration clause vis the Uber app as well.

Legislation is needed

 

[elmwyn]

The "agreement" was made on Uber Eats ( food delivery) but applied to a ride share traffic accident. Not related, JMO

But they were actually participating in the Uber service. To me the equivalent of the Disney case would be something like the couple were hit while using a crosswalk but Uber tried to claim TOS applied because they ordered a burger.

Now I don't think companies should be able to do this either but legally it is a different kettle of fish.