First, if you consider my words to you a "personal attack" or at the very least responding in kind to the condescention you have shown me and others, your words have no merit.
I haven't cast any aspersions on you personally. You have cast aspersions on me personally, rather than just commenting on my ideas.
Please stop with personal attacks.
Second, I, nor anyone else, has suggested that Disney should not make a profit.
It isn't about whether or not Disney should make a profit, but whether or not Disney should make as much profit as they legally can, while ensuring safety and security.
That is their mandate. That is what they're supposed to be doing. If they fail to do that, then they'll be punished by their owners.
There is a point however, where the number one goal of a corporation should not be entirely about profit.
That's simply not true. Indeed, a corporation that routinely places other considerations (other than the law, safety or security) above the best long-term financial interests of its owners deserves to be sued out of existence. Remember Enron?
For example after the earth quake in Haiti...
When we have a catastrope that Disney is making money off of, then let's chat about that
then. What you're referring to are laws against price-gouging in case of emergency. I think part of the problem is that some consumers assumed that charging what something is worth, what buyers are willing to pay, is always wrong, when in reality it is
only wrong in case of emergency, when the value of something skyrockets specifically due to the crisis. So here we see the foundation for a lot of the unfounded expectations held by consumers
Now Disney can charge enormous fees for their "product" that does not necessarly mean it's a good business practice.
Either it is or it isn't, based on the best forecast of how it affects long-term shareholder value. But clearly, that's the yardstick -
not whether a consumer likes it or not.
What I do have an issue with, is the suggestion that somehow my feelings and other's are irrelavent.
Feelings are never irrelevant, in general. They may, however, be irrelevant in the context of running a successful business.
While yours, regardless of what criteria they are based on, are justified on your own point of view.
We're not even talking about my
feelings. Most of what we're talking about is the way business works. The fact that I'm not dissatisfied in the way you are
is just as meaningless. Neither of us matter much, but rather what matters is how things look when you put us all together. If Disney enjoys loads of popularity and demand, then they're doing things right. Even if some of us doesn't like it, as long as enough others do, that's what matters.
Contrary to your statements you have presented no more "facts" than anyone else.
On the contrary, I, and others in this thread, have presented loads of facts. Facts about how businesses really operate, combined with info about Disney's performance. Yet, you've presented no facts refuting that Disney's been increasingly successful doing what they're supposed to be doing over the years.
Further, just because I take issue with certain things doesn't make it inappropriate to state them.
I never said it was inappropriate for you
to state your perspectives.