Disney has a secret army...

However, when someone who really enjoys Disney (myself) shares experiences both good and bad I should not get hammered when I say something slightly negative. (Yep, you guessed it. I'm not a fan of FP+. And someone accused me of bullying when I created a post about over rated food -- I just don't get the schoolbread obsession. ;) )

That's when I wonder ... are you just a zealot who can't see any wrong, or are you a part of this secret army to sway opinions?
That's the thing here... They could very well be a zealot, or paid by disney or some other organization. But they could also just be more sensitive to a post you weren't expecting would hurt them (which we've probably all encountered). So at least where the disboards and its users are concerned, it's much more difficult to determine who is being paid for their posts, and who is just an upset regular user.
 
Nonsense. They would just stick to their blogs unless there was incentive to push the pixie dust.
Did you read the article and the thread? They are sticking to their blogs or other established social media outlets. Not sure what you are thinking - that Disney is recruiting these bloggers to "infiltrate" other social media outlets to help them out? If so, you drew that conclusion on your own, because no where have those who are in this group suggested that they are doing this.

There are the facts, and then there is hysteria and guesswork. I'd prefer to stick with the facts.
 
I'm fine with a blogger writing glowing reports on their own blog. If Disney is recruiting them to invade message boards in order to promote their brand or to shout down dissenting views, then I have a big problem with it. There are some posters on here who have become so vehement in their support of "all-things-Disney" to the point of being rude and condescending to other viewpoints. I would hope that they are simply zealots and not candidly representing Disney.

Thank you for writing what I feel..

Now, I know most of my post are pro disney, but that amount of blogging for such a little discount doesn't seem worth it, unless it was my passion and I was already doing it.

So basically good for the bloggers, bad for the avg traveler. but lets be honest most of the travelers that will go to Disney off a secret mom army blog site don't care for inside info, and if they do they will start to use Google for more info and find us the crazy, cranky dis board.
 
That's the thing here... They could very well be a zealot, or paid by disney or some other organization. But they could also just be more sensitive to a post you weren't expecting would hurt them (which we've probably all encountered). So at least where the disboards and its users are concerned, it's much more difficult to determine who is being paid for their posts, and who is just an upset regular user.

You don't know and that's the part I don't like. You can have a honest different opinion and I respect that. But to be paid to spin my negative I don't like.
 

Don't you think posting repeatedly here or posting trip reports could be considered "blogging?" Wonder if anyone will come forward to say they were approached by Disney and refused or did it for awhile but quit. I'm sure you have to sign a confidentiality agreement.

I don't consider discussion boards to be blogging. Bloggers have their own website typically (through a source or one they develop on their own) and treat it almost like a journal.

Considering a forum to be blogging is like considering a conversation with friends as public speaking. The two are just not the same.
 
That's the thing here... They could very well be a zealot, or paid by disney or some other organization. But they could also just be more sensitive to a post you weren't expecting would hurt them (which we've probably all encountered). So at least where the disboards and its users are concerned, it's much more difficult to determine who is being paid for their posts, and who is just an upset regular user.
I can relate to that. I've been very upset about the Norway thing and I've had some posters tell me that it's no big deal or it is a good move due to (insert reason) which really only frustrates me more. I don't think that they (usually) mean any harm so I keep my mouth shut but it sometimes really bothers me.
 
I don't consider discussion boards to be blogging. Bloggers have their own website typically (through a source or one they develop on their own) and treat it almost like a journal.

Considering a forum to be blogging is like considering a conversation with friends as public speaking. The two are just not the same.
I don't see posting in discussions here as blogging, but I can absolutely see the trip reports here as a form of blogging. Trip reports, at least the ones I've read, are very journal like and read very similarly to blogs, imo.
 
/
I don't see posting in discussions here as blogging, but I can absolutely see the trip reports here as a form of blogging. Trip reports, at least the ones I've read, are very journal like and read very similarly to blogs, imo.
While I do see your point, trip reports make up a tiny percentage of the posts on the Dis, so even a person "blogging" trip reports on the Dis once per year is not really a blogger. I can change the brakes on my car, but I am not an auto mechanic.
 
While I do see your point, trip reports make up a tiny percentage of the posts on the Dis, so even a person "blogging" trip reports on the Dis once per year is not really a blogger. I can change the brakes on my car, but I am not an auto mechanic.
I see your point too, and I'm not saying writing trip reports here puts one in the same category as a blogger like iheartorganizing, etc. Just that I do see it as a form of blogging...a more hobby-level blog than professional, but still a form of blogging. Kind of like changing the brakes on a car like you mentioned...you may not be a professional auto mechanic, but the end result of you changing your brakes is the same - the brakes got changed. I hope that makes sense...Dd was up from 2a-330a this morning, so I'm a bit out of it today.
 
But would anyone actually a part of this army post a trip report in order to influence people? Interesting idea but seems like it would be at least unusual if nothing else.
 
But would anyone actually a part of this army post a trip report in order to influence people? Interesting idea but seems like it would be at least unusual if nothing else.


Maybe if they were trying to get the attention of Disney? I know some people who do trip reports get a pretty dedicated following.
 
Maybe if they were trying to get the attention of Disney? I know some people who do trip reports get a pretty dedicated following.

I just can't get my mind around it.

Don't know why. But it just seems far-fetched to me.

Maybe as a Angel Ariel suggested, some do use their trip report as a blog of sorts, but because they just want to be a blogger. Here, there is at least an opportunity to have followers. In the blogosphere, you would have to do something to get people TO your blog. But here--you can build a following just for the legit joy of blogging. And then some peel off and start an actual blog.
 
But would anyone actually a part of this army post a trip report in order to influence people? Interesting idea but seems like it would be at least unusual if nothing else.

This whole thing seems far fetched to me too, TBH. That said, I learned something new today. I was talking about this article and thread to DH and he was like "oh, you mean astroturfing?". I basically looked at him like :confused: - I've never heard that term before. He frequents more tech forums than I do and apparently he's pretty familiar with the concept. He showed me this definition from wikipedia:

Astroturfing is the practice of masking the sponsors of a message or organization (e.g., political, advertising, religious or public relations) to make it appear as though it originates from and is supported by grassroots participant(s). It is a practice intended to give the statements or organizations more credibility by withholding information about the source's financial connection. The term astroturfing is a derivation of AstroTurf, a brand of synthetic carpeting designed to look like natural grass, a play on the word "grassroots." The implication behind the use of the term is that there are no "true" or "natural" grassroots, but rather "fake" or "artificial" support, though some astroturfing operatives defend the practice (see Justification below).

On the Internet, astroturfers use software to mask their identity. Sometimes one individual operates over many personas to give the impression of widespread support for their client's agenda.[1][2] Some studies suggest astroturfing can alter public viewpoints and create enough doubt to inhibit action.

The bolded part caught my attention...I guess if there's studies out there that show that this astroturfing does alter public opinion, then I'm not surprised that companies use the technique. There was an interesting article from The Guardian (UK publisher) about astroturfing, but that particular article had a political POV, so I won't post that here..I'm sure it's easy to find on google, though. It was an interesting article on this whole concept.

Still weird to me, though!
 
This whole thing seems far fetched to me too, TBH. That said, I learned something new today. I was talking about this article and thread to DH and he was like "oh, you mean astroturfing?". I basically looked at him like :confused: - I've never heard that term before. He frequents more tech forums than I do and apparently he's pretty familiar with the concept. He showed me this definition from wikipedia:



The bolded part caught my attention...I guess if there's studies out there that show that this astroturfing does alter public opinion, then I'm not surprised that companies use the technique. There was an interesting article from The Guardian (UK publisher) about astroturfing, but that particular article had a political POV, so I won't post that here..I'm sure it's easy to find on google, though. It was an interesting article on this whole concept.

Still weird to me, though!

That is eye opening. Wow!
 
This whole thing seems far fetched to me too, TBH. That said, I learned something new today. I was talking about this article and thread to DH and he was like "oh, you mean astroturfing?". I basically looked at him like :confused: - I've never heard that term before. He frequents more tech forums than I do and apparently he's pretty familiar with the concept. He showed me this definition from wikipedia:



The bolded part caught my attention...I guess if there's studies out there that show that this astroturfing does alter public opinion, then I'm not surprised that companies use the technique. There was an interesting article from The Guardian (UK publisher) about astroturfing, but that particular article had a political POV, so I won't post that here..I'm sure it's easy to find on google, though. It was an interesting article on this whole concept.

Still weird to me, though!


I believe LarryZ touched upon this notion when he posted the following:


It's kind of appropriate, I believe.

After all, Disney uses Astroturf in a few of their facilities, why not on social media?
 
This happens pretty much everywhere I imagine. Some people refer to them as "plants" too even though that term is usually used for those who try to direct the crowd at shows and such places.

How do I get such a gig? ;)
 

PixFuture Display Ad Tag












Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE














DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Back
Top