- Joined
- Aug 23, 1999
- Messages
- 36,337
People figured out all kinds of things.Either I’m very honest or very dumb, but some of these cheat methods just boggles me. Never would have thought to do this or that to get around rules.
The previous program had a printed cardboard card with a handwritten name, number of guests and dates valid.
People were giving them away or selling them as 'never ending Fastpasses'.
When DAS was introduced, it was still a cardboard card, but included a photo of the guest it was issued to and the CMs printed the card.
It couldn't be sold since it was printed and personalized, but one 'hack' people came up with was going to Guest Relations and claiming they lost or forgot to bring their card from their resort.
With a second (or third) card, they could get extra DAS Return Times
Yep.Apparently at one point Disney tried to stop the cheaters by using pens with differently colored ink to write the return times. The cheaters responded by bringing along pens with a range of different ink colors.
I heard that from CMs
I don't think that was actually as widespread as the articles suggested, at least at WDW. By that point, actual wheelchair users knew that most lines at WDW were Mainstreamed and wheelchair users didn't skip the lines. The attraction the users of the 'tour guides' mentioned most in the articles was Small World. That did (and still does) have an alternate entry, but since EVERYONE with an alternate entry stamp on their GAC (Guest Assistance Card) was using it, the wait there was often VERY long. Those 'tour guides' were actually pretty good at marketing - they convinced their customers that most attractions (even those with usually short posted wait times) would be hours without using the tour guide.Remember the news stories several years ago about groups paying wheelchair users to be “tour guides” to gain access? It’s sad what people will do.
Guests with mobility devices had no choice but to use that line. When we went during that time period, the line was often filled from top of the ramp to the bottom and outside of the attraction. Often, there would only be 2 or 3 guests in the whole line with a mobility device and the wait in that line was often 45 minutes, even when the wait in the regular line was short.
I saw CMs trying to tell guests they didn't need to use GAC on the ride because they would get on in less than half the time or much less using the regular line. The people I saw pretty much all argued with the CM and used the alternate entry instead.
One time, my husband got into the alternate entry with our daughter in her wheelchair while I walked over to another attraction - it was either Big Thunder Mountain or Pirates. I left them at Small World, walked to Frontierland, rode and came back to Small World. They were still only about 1/2 way down the ramp to the load area. I couldn't get to them, so I got into the regular line with a posted wait of 20 minutes. We ended up riding within one boat of each other.
Their wait in line was almost 45 minutes longer than my wait.
I'm not saying there were not 'wheelchair tour guides', but Disney had ways of dealing with them, including taking away their passes and trespassing them for using passes for commercial purposes.
Disney had another problem that they had no way of dealing with other than changing the program. GAC allowed guests with the 'alternate entry' and 'green arrow' stamps to show them for immediate entry into the Fastpass lane. Guests were using that for access that was not intended, but also not forbidden. People were using GAC to go on high demand/high wait attractions thru the Fastpass entry, riding and getting right back into the Fastpass Line to ride multiple times. People also posted using GAC during Holidays to stay a few hours, ride as many things as they wanted without waiting, then go home early in the day.
There was conjecture that Disney was happy about promoting the 'wheelchair tour guide' stories because those guests were actually doing something wrong. It would look good to have articles denigrating people who were actually using GAC in a way that was not against the rules.