This came up a couple hundred pages ago but I will rehash it - because sometimes seeing what is reasonable through a different lens can help what feels like an unfair change make sense. Sorry, super long, guess I'm chatty today.
We have crazy food issues in my family.
We can't just mobile order, and we can't just approach the counter and order like normal people. We have to do the order through a chef process, which can first involve waiting for the chef. Then we are in a line behind everyone else who ordered special, and others who didn't order special if the kitchen is busy, then we often need to go to a second location for something for a different person and start the whole process over. QS meals can take hours. If someone can't certainly wait an hour+, we have to split and send parts of our group to different restaurants. Is any of this fair? Does this mean they are punishing us for having a disability?
We need to eat, and Disney gets us food though it might not be fully convenient. Concerning
DAS, Your group needs to wait and needs to get through the line. One person can't do the line itself, so they wait in a different space. Disney found a way to allow the whole party to ride together. We have to split up for our food waits, this doesn't mean I'm being punished, it means we are getting what we need in different ways for different people. Disney didn't cause us to need different accommodations.
The argument that every person with a disability that causes issues with the line should get a preferred alternative with their entire group in tow, is similar to saying when I want food I should reach the ordering counter and the entire restaurant should STOP until my group is served. Because every time a party enters the LL, the standby stops for that one slot. It wouldn't be fair for my order process to take longer, so everyone in the place might wait 20 minutes until the chef comes out. Picture the whole kitchen shuts down every time an allergy order comes in. Because I shouldn't be punished for having a disability, so they should accommodate it in the way I
prefer. This means they serve my entire group from one location, and in the same time it takes for a regular order. I can even further say this is to make up for some uncertain amount of hardship faced elsewhere, additional bathroom time, time to research where I can even try to eat, etc.
The reason the analogy makes sense is that DAS gives the person with the disability to right to say "I would like to go do that later, and it will happen on demand when I want to go and with my whole family" Then everyone stuck in standby is put on hold for it at the moment they choose. Not a big deal when it's one party, but we all know it's not just one party a couple times/day coming back with a DAS. When it's getting up to 5 or 10%, it can basically shut the park down, the same way my "I will order and get food at my place in line" would do so. Everyone is always saying it's the same wait, just an alternative space - and if that's all it is, then it's ok for the accommodation to be an alternative wait
for the individual who is saying they need an alternative wait.
I know it's easier to think it's not changing the line because if you weren't in LL, you would have been in standby - but it doesn't work that way unless every person with a DAS literally does nothing with that extra time it affords them. I know it also sucks to have to split up, but this is not a problem unique to families with a disability. People without disabilities get tired, get hungry, have bathroom needs, kids have meltdowns, ADULTS have meltdowns, we get crabby and sad and impatient, and just need time apart as much as we need time together. If we want to say people with disabilities are only asking for equal footing, it can't come with demands for special exceptions for everything unpleasant that happens to people at all.