DAS changes coming WDW May 20/ DL June 18, 2024

Just a thought about this *needs* thing...

It's been said a lots here. But it looks like the *needs* is what the person at the other side of the video chat decides what is someone's *needs* is

And not necessarily the person own body's required *needs*

Just a thought.....
The alternative is to give everyone a DAS, which isn’t sustainable. Not everyone needs to wait outside the line the entire time. It’s very likely that many, if not most, of the people who had DAS for “just in case” would have been fine waiting in line and leaving if necessary.
 
But hasn’t that always been the case? Couldn’t apply for DAS until shortly before trip or while there? No one knew FOR SURE until that time, it was always just an assumption that one would be approved.

Disney is always making changes too, so people shouldn’t assume that everything will be the same in 10mo when they go on their trip…. This is a good reminder to book refundable or look into trip insurance for people who’s needs are so much that any changes from Disney could ruin their whole trip.
DAS Advance video registration began in October 2021 for WDW and December 2021 for Disneyland.
Before that, ALL registration was after arriving on vacation/at the location. There was no guarantee that DAS would be approved just because it was previously. It was supposed to always be re-registration with being asked why it was needed each time.
We were always asked - possibly because DD is a full time wheelchair user and they wanted to make sure she had needs related to waiting in lines that were not related to mobility.
I have to say I’m a bit surprised at how many times I am seeing people posting on social media that DAS is “no longer” being granted for mobility issues that can be addressed with a wheelchair or scooter. My understanding was that DAS was NEVER supposed to be granted for this kind of issue, given that almost all lines are fully accessible (with return times being granted at the attraction for those who which are not). I can only assume that quite a few people successfully badgered CMs into bending the rules for them, which presumably is one of the reasons for Disney moving DAS related decisions to a new dedicated team.
DAS was never needed to use a mobility device in lines/attractions, even in the 1980s when lines were not all accessible. That was true as well for GAC (Guest Assistance Card) which was the disability program before DAS.
There was nothing on the Disney websites about GAC. When DAS replaced it in 2013, Disney had information online about DAS which indicated it was meant for guests whose disability prevented them from waiting (not standing) in the regular lines. It also included information that indicated DAS was not meant for guests whose primary need was mobility or stamina/based on need to use a mobility device (I don't have the exact wording because it was edited off with th recent DAS changes).
Just a thought about this *needs* thing...

It's been said a lots here. But it looks like the *needs* is what the person at the other side of the video chat decides what is someone's *needs* is

And not necessarily the person own body's required *needs*

Just a thought.....
Not exactly. It's up to the guest to explain their need/concerns related to waiting in the line. The CMs are using criteria to look at which needs prevent waiting in the line and which could possibly be met in other ways. So, trying to sort out which is which.
If whatever is suggested doesn't work, there is the option to re-contact the Accessibility Team and explain the specific issues the guest had.
I have a somewhat similar q

I have similar questions

Without Zoom is not possible to do the chat anymore?

Couple of years ago I tried VPN it did work on my laptop. But now I'm reading is possible to do on mobile phone?

My laptop is too slow now ... mobile might be better. Is it possible to download VPN to mobiles?

I'm extremely bad in tech stuff ....
The video portion is being done on Zoom. You don't need a laptop, you can download the Zoom app on a smartphone or tablet.
I think they changed to Zoom because of the many problems people had connecting and staying connected with the secure chat they had been using.
 
Your examples all count "bodies" but the standby "wait" is minutes, not bodies. It is a difference. The standby wait time is about length of time from entrance to exit, which agreeably has to do with how quickly (or slowly) the number of bodies moves through both queues. Therefore, it doesn't matter if the body is in the standby queue or the LL, that body has impacted the standby wait time just the same. A body not in the queue is not impacting the standby to any significant degree, and if they are it's the absence of that body allowing the queue to move more quickly.
The "bodies" being counted are not the bodies in the line but the bodies on the ride. So putting fewer bodies in LL will allow the SB line to move more quickly. If people are waiting virtually, their bodies might not be in line, but they are on the ride.
 
Just a thought about this *needs* thing...

It's been said a lots here. But it looks like the *needs* is what the person at the other side of the video chat decides what is someone's *needs* is

And not necessarily the person own body's required *needs*

Just a thought.....
How would you propose that needs are determined? There needs to be a process to gatekeep something so desirable (as shown by the overuse that led to this mess in the first place), and it has already been discussed at length why doctor notes, diagnoses, and self attestation won’t work.
 

How would you propose that needs are determined? There needs to be a process to gatekeep something so desirable (as shown by the overuse that led to this mess in the first place), and it has already been discussed at length why doctor notes, diagnoses, and self attestation won’t work.
I believe the current approach is the most specific way to identify a request for reasonable accommodations for the queue by asking the important question of : why can't you remain in a standard queue.

The really hard part that I have with this particular question is the demand it places on the requestor in their ability to adequately explain and voice their disability -- especially when the bar is for those with developmental disabilities to which it is particularly difficult to get points clearly communicated.

There IS no easier way about it though aside taking the time to walk through the question, and even scenarios to determine what accommodation is suitable to match the disability to allow accessibility to the attraction.

I do commend Disney for actually allowing the time and space for their CMs to each requestor. This is something I know would no happen with their competitors -- frequent testimonials of 1+ hour conversations -- that's not a money saving action plan by any metric.
 
I was at DLR today— even though there are still many people (including me) with DAS access under the old system that hasn’t expired yet, the lightening lanes were remarkably different than I’m used to (also worth noting that G+ return time options were actually harder to get—my inference is that they have not allocated more G+ capacity but more people are using it?)—here are some examples:
Webslingers— straight into the show room (even though the ride has broken down for about 30m and come back maybe 10m before we arrived)— the wait between pre show and actual ride was a little longer
Incredicoaster— 2-3m scan in wait and walked basically to the merge point mid-afternoon (this almost never happens)
Midway Mania- No wait to scan, one group ahead of us at the merge point
Space Mountain- 2-3m to scan, walked almost to merge point—often we have to skip SM because there are switchbacks outside
Big Thunder- No wait to scan, almost directly to merge point

We did a couple other rides that almost always have short LLs anyway (Rise, Smuggler’s Run). Buzz Lightyear had no wait to scan (unusual!) but still a few minutes to the merge (not complaining, total LL wait was lower but once scanned about average).

Anyway, since my issues are not developmental, I assume I’ll be an ex-DAS user soon (I paid for G+ today and used it wherever I could)— but if it means we can use AQR or paid LLs reliably without long LL waits (and don’t have to keep skipping favorite rides because of LL waits), I will consider it an improvement for our family.
 
Just checking in to see if there's been any real life stories yet of parties of 2 where one of the group cannot be unattended? I have mobility problems caused be an RTI and use an ECV (not why I need DAS), but I have used DAS previously because of internal injuries that make me require regular and urgent trips to a bathroom (lines over 30 minutes are a total non-starter for me) and the associated anxiety that goes hand in hand with that.

Meaning, my partner can't do the line for me because I can't be alone outside of the line, and I can't leave a line alone to attend the bathroom just in case I might need assistance. I know previously it was unclear how this would be addressed, but just curious to see if anyone had raised this issue yet and what the proposed solution was.
 
Just a quick check-in to say that EP was very, VERY slow yesterday, but I used DAS for Ratatouille and was shocked to walk straight through the LL queue - there was literally not another person in front of me until the merge. I’ve NEVER seen that before, even on comparably slow days! SB was posted as 70 minutes, FWIW.
 
I was at DLR today— even though there are still many people (including me) with DAS access under the old system that hasn’t expired yet, the lightening lanes were remarkably different than I’m used to (also worth noting that G+ return time options were actually harder to get—my inference is that they have not allocated more G+ capacity but more people are using it?)—here are some examples:
Webslingers— straight into the show room (even though the ride has broken down for about 30m and come back maybe 10m before we arrived)— the wait between pre show and actual ride was a little longer
Incredicoaster— 2-3m scan in wait and walked basically to the merge point mid-afternoon (this almost never happens)
Midway Mania- No wait to scan, one group ahead of us at the merge point
Space Mountain- 2-3m to scan, walked almost to merge point—often we have to skip SM because there are switchbacks outside
Big Thunder- No wait to scan, almost directly to merge point

We did a couple other rides that almost always have short LLs anyway (Rise, Smuggler’s Run). Buzz Lightyear had no wait to scan (unusual!) but still a few minutes to the merge (not complaining, total LL wait was lower but once scanned about average).

Anyway, since my issues are not developmental, I assume I’ll be an ex-DAS user soon (I paid for G+ today and used it wherever I could)— but if it means we can use AQR or paid LLs reliably without long LL waits (and don’t have to keep skipping favorite rides because of LL waits), I will consider it an improvement for our family.
I believe this is what Disney's ultimate goal is to reach and maintain. -- a minimal wait in the LL until.merge point is reached AND a queue that's < 10 minutes from that point to ride.load.... that will serve all stakeholders well.

From there, they will have to deploy whatever queue management options they have at their disposal to optimize operations, ADA accommodations, and yes, profits from LL upsells.

My fear is that they prioritize upsells with more LL slots over missing appropriate accommodations and cut too close to the bone.... and that's up to folk like this community to keep them honest from that aspect.
 
Just a quick check-in to say that EP was very, VERY slow yesterday, but I used DAS for Ratatouille and was shocked to walk straight through the LL queue - there was literally not another person in front of me until the merge. I’ve NEVER seen that before, even on comparably slow days! SB was posted as 70 minutes, FWIW.
This was what our experience was like on our last trip- it was the week that straddles April/May - we basically spent two days per park, and the LL's were being given extra priority so in most cases the LL line was EMPTY, even if there was a line to scan in to it. They were just stopping standby completely if anyone came in that line. That happening is why I've been commenting about it being a huge issue for the standby, because people trickling in meant we had standby situations where we would stand still for 5 minutes, move 2-3 parties, and stand for 5 minutes all the way through. We timed it at 7Dwarves because my son was getting mad. Most of ride capacity was being used exclusively for the LL and it was consistent throughout the day. A standby HM line length that would have been 15-20 minute on past trips took us over an hour. It was the first ride of the trip and made for a rude awakening as we watched them fill the space by the graveyard 4 times from LL as we were next, and had been stopped about 5 parties back to watch the same thing just before.
I don't know if we were just "lucky" and someone was running an experiment, but it was broken enough for us to buy G+ for 6 people after getting off that ride and doing it again every day we were there.
 
This was what our experience was like on our last trip- it was the week that straddles April/May - we basically spent two days per park, and the LL's were being given extra priority so in most cases the LL line was EMPTY, even if there was a line to scan in to it. They were just stopping standby completely if anyone came in that line. That happening is why I've been commenting about it being a huge issue for the standby, because people trickling in meant we had standby situations where we would stand still for 5 minutes, move 2-3 parties, and stand for 5 minutes all the way through. We timed it at 7Dwarves because my son was getting mad. Most of ride capacity was being used exclusively for the LL and it was consistent throughout the day. A standby HM line length that would have been 15-20 minute on past trips took us over an hour. It was the first ride of the trip and made for a rude awakening as we watched them fill the space by the graveyard 4 times from LL as we were next, and had been stopped about 5 parties back to watch the same thing just before.
I don't know if we were just "lucky" and someone was running an experiment, but it was broken enough for us to buy G+ for 6 people after getting off that ride and doing it again every day we were there.
That's the intent of the LL upsell -- at least that would be the primary incentive for those in the SB queue to do exactly that after watching before the merge line what the LL is and for those <10minutes post merge to contemplate -- man, that LL really is worth it, isn't it? -- and buying the upsell experience.

at the same time, that short LL is what helps stakeholders needing accommodations too -- an efficient LL to the merge point to enter a queue that subsequently post-merge is <10minutes wait to ride loading.

Now if Disney can only resist expanding too many LL to make that queue long again premerge. -- that serves no one well.
 
Yes I got the point and I thought I reflected to that. At least that was my intention.


I do think leaving the line in a wheelchair/EVC is very problematic in a hurry or even impossible for some on time.

I think DAS is that's why warranted for those even if it's "just in case".
Yes, after the merge is the same line but the overall wait time with DAS should be shorter than the stand by ....so less likely would cause problems. Isn't this what the post is about? That they suggested that after the merge is the same difficulty to get out doesn't matter from which line the person coming from?

It does matter... if someone spend less time overall in the line less likely that they have to get out?

Did I misread it?
They were saying DAS or no DAS doesn't make a difference in difficulty leaving the line or post merge or pre-show, etc physically speaking. They were discussing the actual logistical aspect of doing so which presents itself in either line or during things leading up to the actual ride like a pre-show. This is for any individual or group. Their point was giving DAS as a "just in case" someone needs to the leave the line due to a difficulty was negated due to that.

To use your 10min example if you spent 10 mins in a LL line only to need to leave during a pre-show due to an issue the only thing that really occurred is now you've disrupted your actual ride experience instead of just a queue aspect. A person can and statistically speaking will find themselves in that situation among many others. That variability in queue issues (where someone has ups and downs on a more frequent basis as being the core of their issue) seems to be something Disney is aiming towards. It doesn't matter if we, you or anyone else feels something is warranted.
 
Just to keep something in mind if you didn't go to DL during MP time period you may be unaware. This priority towards a get ahead of the line is not new at all. This halting of the standby line in a very painful way is nothing new. We felt our only way to get any sort of enjoyment out of DL was to purchase MP. We had our first trip (3 days) with it mostly due to our DISer friend tagging along who would have it, lasted 1 days on the second trip without it and got so frustrated at how Disney did it that we purchased MP for the remaining days. It's nothing new. As far as I'm aware it's just ramped up in terms of giving even more priority to LL users than Disney gave to FP+ (which includes MaxPass guests).
 
That's the intent of the LL upsell -- at least that would be the primary incentive for those in the SB queue to do exactly that after watching before the merge line what the LL is and for those <10minutes post merge to contemplate -- man, that LL really is worth it, isn't it? -- and buying the upsell experience.

at the same time, that short LL is what helps stakeholders needing accommodations too -- an efficient LL to the merge point to enter a queue that subsequently post-merge is <10minutes wait to ride loading.

Now if Disney can only resist expanding too many LL to make that queue long again premerge. -- that serves no one well.
I don't think they intended it to be nearly as dramatic as what we lived through. I mean "look at how cool that advantage is!" Yes. "OMG I literally can't do anything at all without that pass!" No. We saw a large amount of DAS usage taking up that LL, and yes I know blue isn't always DAS, but when it's group after group reorganizing so little Betsy scans first, they all look at the CM waiting, then all scan in green, it's not subtle if you know. My teenager asked why so many groups of kids traveling for the most boring sport ever (dance/cheer) all had one kid with a disability pass.
There's certainly incentive to keep the LL quick, but it improves overall guest satisfaction when it's both quick and a reasonable ratio- like when it was FP. We knew lines wouldn't be as bad if we got the FP, but when we didn't they weren't complete standstills as long as the ride didn't go down. This was just standstill to the point it made more people need the DAS because it would aggravate anyone. (physical and psychological reasons)
 
I don't think they intended it to be nearly as dramatic as what we lived through. I mean "look at how cool that advantage is!" Yes. "OMG I literally can't do anything at all without that pass!" No. We saw a large amount of DAS usage taking up that LL, and yes I know blue isn't always DAS, but when it's group after group reorganizing so little Betsy scans first, they all look at the CM waiting, then all scan in green, it's not subtle if you know. My teenager asked why so many groups of kids traveling for the most boring sport ever (dance/cheer) all had one kid with a disability pass.
There's certainly incentive to keep the LL quick, but it improves overall guest satisfaction when it's both quick and a reasonable ratio- like when it was FP. We knew lines wouldn't be as bad if we got the FP, but when we didn't they weren't complete standstills as long as the ride didn't go down. This was just standstill to the point it made more people need the DAS because it would aggravate anyone. (physical and psychological reasons)
So the difference between LL and standby pre-merge had its intended effect -- push one to buy the upsell. Disney business operations person's POV -- mission accomplished. If it was too dramatic to point where SB party says 'I'm not coming back to Disney -- and mean it. -- then it's a business loss in capacity sell standpoint, All those are business decisions (including the LL: SB line ratio to throttle).

Please don't mix that above with the same issue of accommodations. Most WDW DAS holders now are recipients of the new revamped rules including parties of 4.

Also calling folk little Betsy doesn't help.
 
So the difference between LL and standby pre-merge had its intended effect -- push one to buy the upsell. Disney business operations person's POV -- mission accomplished. If it was too dramatic to point where SB party says 'I'm not coming back to Disney -- and mean it. -- then it's a business loss in capacity sell standpoint, All those are business decisions (including the LL: SB line ratio to throttle).

Please don't mix that above with the same issue of accommodations. Most WDW DAS holders now are recipients of the new revamped rules including parties of 4.

Also calling folk little Betsy doesn't help.
I was trying to pick a name that wasn't common to get a point across. I have an aunt named Betsy and haven't ever met another in person.

It IS mixed with the issue of accommodations whether or not people like it, because the LL is partially occupied with people who are using it as an accommodation. This ratio was even higher a couple months ago. My trip was just before the changes, so it's irrelevant that they have cut back on that portion since my dates, as that hadn't happened yet. The purpose is the illustrate that the rate of accommodation was changing how the system functioned in a way that made the standby line a parking lot. They were slow days, and even walk ons had lines waiting for LL to stream past. Many people would have been motivated by ask for help for milder conditions aggravated only by the wait itself, rather than to buy a product, in response to what we were witnessing. In this way the accommodation itself (granting DAS then prioritizing it enough to allow people who really can't wait an actual ability to ride) was causing more people to need said accommodation. While it is a sensitive topic, this is not a situation where there are no losers due to too many passes being granted.
 
I was trying to pick a name that wasn't common to get a point across. I have an aunt named Betsy and haven't ever met another in person.

It IS mixed with the issue of accommodations whether or not people like it, because the LL is partially occupied with people who are using it as an accommodation. This ratio was even higher a couple months ago. My trip was just before the changes, so it's irrelevant that they have cut back on that portion since my dates, as that hadn't happened yet. The purpose is the illustrate that the rate of accommodation was changing how the system functioned in a way that made the standby line a parking lot. They were slow days, and even walk ons had lines waiting for LL to stream past. Many people would have been motivated by ask for help for milder conditions aggravated only by the wait itself, rather than to buy a product, in response to what we were witnessing. In this way the accommodation itself (granting DAS then prioritizing it enough to allow people who really can't wait an actual ability to ride) was causing more people to need said accommodation. While it is a sensitive topic, this is not a situation where there are no losers due to too many passes being granted.
That's the priority of LL. DAS holders in that situation still have to wait the SB line time virtually. They are virtually in the same parking lot. Post revamp, they are again in the same SB line.

if accommodations still needed for that moment, AQR has been the accommodation identified to address the queue disability and handled at the merge -- which I would think the CM would be instructed to count as a SB party being entered.

I get folk maybe motivated to inquire on DAS. If the need meets the level of that accommodation determined by Disney, it will issued. The SB line is what it is -- a monster by any other name.
 
A little more on the Ratatouille situation yesterday that may be helpful…

They were absolutely NOT holding the SB line while letting only LL enter: in a line of maybe 25-30 people between the merge and boarding, I was only one of three who came from the LL - and we were held for a minute while about 15 from SB went through ahead of us. Obviously this was a single point in time and conditions may vary for other points in time. My point was that in a two week period, this was my second experience that LL waits have decreased by a lot, whether due to changes in DAS, operations, or just plain low crowds. People have expressed that LLs were getting too long for DAS to be effective, so I was passing along that that may be changing and/or that if you need low wait times, summer may be the time for you to visit!

I also guarantee the actual SB wait was not the posted 70 minutes. WDW is artistically inflating posted waits like crazy, and I firmly believe the intent is to sell more G+/LL. Disney has shown 60 minute waits for rides that were literally walk-on a few days ago. Every ride in Future World yesterday was 5 mins, except Soarin’, at 35. I would caution folks to take any official wait times with a large grain of salt.
 
That's the priority of LL. DAS holders in that situation still have to wait the SB line time virtually. They are virtually in the same parking lot. Post revamp, they are again in the same SB line.

if accommodations still needed for that moment, AQR has been the accommodation identified to address the queue disability and handled at the merge -- which I would think the CM would be instructed to count as a SB party being entered.

I get folk maybe motivated to inquire on DAS. If the need meets the level of that accommodation determined by Disney, it will issued. The SB line is what it is -- a monster by any other name.
Are we really still at the point of discussing this like it's the same experience to book a ride while you are 15 minutes away in another line, ride something else/eat/shop/whatever and return when you're ready vs being in a standstill line? This only even starts to work as a vaguely similar scenario when people had to go to the line entrance to get a return time, and then would still only be something like the same if activities during that wait were restricted. I know Disney does not restrict them, but a wait with a DAS is not the same as a wait in the line, hence DAS being appealing or useful to anyone. It might be "virtually" the same, but it is factually and wear and tear on a person's body and nerves not the same.

The "virtual" wait being moved to outside of the line space, then funneling into the LL queue causes the standby backups that are the reason many can't stand in a standby line - the standing still, the tight proximity to others, the lack of airflow and movement, and it snowballs for everyone. A faster moving standby line makes that line itself a more manageable situation. It is also known that before they put in express lanes, regular lines didn't take as long. (true across various parks) The higher the use of any express lane, the higher the waits in the regular lane. Lowering use rates of express lanes makes regular lanes more accessible for all parkgoers. (there are still going to be some who need an accommodation, but that rate plummets)
A little more on the Ratatouille situation yesterday that may be helpful…

They were absolutely NOT holding the SB line while letting only LL enter: in a line of maybe 25-30 people between the merge and boarding, I was only one of three who came from the LL - and we were held for a minute while about 15 from SB went through ahead of us. Obviously this was a single point in time and conditions may vary for other points in time. My point was that in a two week period, this was my second experience that LL waits have decreased by a lot, whether due to changes in DAS, operations, or just plain low crowds. People have expressed that LLs were getting too long for DAS to be effective, so I was passing along that that may be changing and/or that if you need low wait times, summer may be the time for you to visit!

I also guarantee the actual SB wait was not the posted 70 minutes. WDW is artistically inflating posted waits like crazy, and I firmly believe the intent is to sell more G+/LL. Disney has shown 60 minute waits for rides that were literally walk-on a few days ago. Every ride in Future World yesterday was 5 mins, except Soarin’, at 35. I would caution folks to take any official wait times with a large grain of salt.
Of course, with the number of people entering the LL decreased, they wouldn't have to hold the standby line. My whole point was the number of people who had been filing in were creating an issue, a lower number of people filing through solves both the "holding the standby" and the "LL is too long" at the same time. The capacity ratio isn't going to be the same when you don't have half the people on any ride using LL.

ETA- regarding posted waits, we observed even pre-covid that waits seem to now include the actual ride time. This for the most part has held true on our rides the past maybe 7 years or so? We've found it useful when trying to make all the ADR's we need to do.
 
Are we really still at the point of discussing this like it's the same experience to book a ride while you are 15 minutes away in another line, ride something else/eat/shop/whatever and return when you're ready vs being in a standstill line? This only even starts to work as a vaguely similar scenario when people had to go to the line entrance to get a return time, and then would still only be something like the same if activities during that wait were restricted. I know Disney does not restrict them, but a wait with a DAS is not the same as a wait in the line, hence DAS being appealing or useful to anyone. It might be "virtually" the same, but it is factually and wear and tear on a person's body and nerves not the same.

The "virtual" wait being moved to outside of the line space, then funneling into the LL queue causes the standby backups that are the reason many can't stand in a standby line - the standing still, the tight proximity to others, the lack of airflow and movement, and it snowballs for everyone. A faster moving standby line makes that line itself a more manageable situation. It is also known that before they put in express lanes, regular lines didn't take as long. (true across various parks) The higher the use of any express lane, the higher the waits in the regular lane. Lowering use rates of express lanes makes regular lanes more accessible for all parkgoers. (there are still going to be some who need an accommodation, but that rate plummets)

Of course, with the number of people entering the LL decreased, they wouldn't have to hold the standby line. My whole point was the number of people who had been filing in were creating an issue, a lower number of people filing through solves both the "holding the standby" and the "LL is too long" at the same time. The capacity ratio isn't going to be the same when you don't have half the people on any ride using LL.

ETA- regarding posted waits, we observed even pre-covid that waits seem to now include the actual ride time. This for the most part has held true on our rides the past maybe 7 years or so? We've found it useful when trying to make all the ADR's we need to do.
That's not wait times by definition. I believe @PrincessV is more true than not -- inflate standby times for two specific purposes: DAS virtual waits are extended and incentive to push G+ upsells.

Ironically, those DAS offramped to AQR probably will see faster throughputs than DAS holders if we're all talking about absolute need to ride (which most DAS holders aren't really interested in vs just getting on the rides successfully is our goal).
 












Save Up to 30% on Rooms at Walt Disney World!

Save up to 30% on rooms at select Disney Resorts Collection hotels when you stay 5 consecutive nights or longer in late summer and early fall. Plus, enjoy other savings for shorter stays.This offer is valid for stays most nights from August 1 to October 11, 2025.
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top