If Disney chooses to extend from 120 to longer, particularly in conjunction to narrowing the types of “qualifying” needs to things that tend to be more permanent in nature that’s fine. But to imagine that IBCCES will do anything at all to actually prevent fraud is unfortunately very much at odds with reality, as has been discussed here over and over and over again.
Not more important - accommodated differently. Disney believes that AQR will accommodate the needs of many.
IBCCES can only help. It shouldn't be discounted like it wouldn't fit. If it didn't, nobody would honor it or use it right?
It does take a life of its own here
I stand corrected, and rightfully so. You're correct, however I disagree with the process they use to derive the decision to accommodate
“IBCCES can only help” until someone says “but IBCCES said I was disabled and Disney still didn’t give me what I wanted.”
I've seen this mentioned a few times here. Based solely on the people on the DIS who have been approved, it's clear this isn't the only people they're approving.
What they haven’t addressed is the elephant in the room: The ability to use it to re-ride attractions, I mean due to my needs, there are certain attractions I can’t go on (same for DH). Even if they still wanted to make a limit, say there are 20 Lightning Lane eligible attractions in a park, then limit it to a max of 20 uses in the park for the day, not that you could probably get that many anyway, but you get the idea. Of course there would need to be something in place so that you can’t say take a slot from an unpopular attraction and use it on the most popular attraction in the park.
I agree with you that the 90 min wait is ridiculous. I wasn't only responding to your post, but the posts leading to it that seemed to take that entire line as DAS interviews when, given it is for all manner of accommodations at DLR, there's no way to know the entire wait is due to DAS.
I think you are referring to my post. I didn’t mean to imply that all 90 minutes were DAS users. It was more of a philosophical question about how much guests “should” try to help themselves first vs. pushing everything off on Disney. I tell my kids to do for themselves what they can and I’ll help them with what they can’t. My son is pretty good about it. My daughter is still a (Disney) princess.
That's the beauty of free speech and an open forum! All that being said, if you are wronged in your life or discriminated against I will do my best to support you.
No elephant to address. Disney apparently does not think re-rides (via DAS) are any kind of problem. If they had any such concern I'm sure it would have been addressed within the current changes. It seems obvious to me that Disney feels re-rides are not a significant issue, especially once they reduce the number of DAS-holders. I'm sure they have data to back that up as well.
I agree
I thought that there were legal reasons why re-rides were permitted under DAS (because SB guests can re-ride if they choose to).
Return of FP+ reincarnated. -- just a fee service now -- or what we would call Maxpass 2.0 from the DLR side of the house.
Honestly, as a parent of a child with significant needs I get tired of the narrative that we just need to parent better (not specific to anyone here, but in general).
