debbieandroo
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2008
- Messages
- 2,085
Wow, one of the LA Times' national correspondents, Andrew Malcolm, is bewildered by the selection of Panetta as the head of the CIA, but he thinks he knows the reason for this selection:
He also notes that Senator DiFi's initial reaction is to go thumbs down on the pick. She says "My position has consistently been, that I believe the Agency is best-served by having an intelligence professional in charge at this time." Jay Rockefeller is also not too thrilled. It appears that Team-O also committed a Transition 101 mistake by not telling key Congressional leaders about Panetta's selection and they instead learned of it by reading it in the NY Times... Oooops.
I'm not getting too many warm fuzzies about national security being a top priority on Obama's part.
oh c'mon, Geoff - Panetta will be perfect as CIA chief because Obama had such good intentions in selecting him...such loyalty to one another, isn't this what the CIA needs in a chief? After all, with Obama in charge, will we even need a CIA? Well, we will in order to clean up GWB's messes but that should only take a couple of days....[/sarc]
It's all about the good intentions or the image - nothing seems to matter in terms of silly things like competency or *gasp* experience!








