mom22belles
<font color=red>Welcomed Guest<br><font color=teal
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2002
- Messages
- 389
for answering me Mystery Machine. I thought I was maybe imganing things. 

I have rarely been so stunned by the lack of openmindedness on this board. SOme of you are really making me feel that Protestants are very narrowminded about faith!
Originally posted by tonyswife
Okie dokie, I'm bowing out of this thread. My intent was to try and find out why the wheat must be resent in the bread. Some people have a better idea than others and I was jut curious as to why this is uch a big deal. I'm not "bashing" anyone. M ost of my family is still Catholic, some of them practice, some of them don't. It's all good with me. I'm sorry if I offended anyone.
If you beleive in transubstantiation, than it becomes important and more than a legalism. While I don't beleive in it, I can see the logic there.Originally posted by Lanshark
Does anyone, who is Christian, really think Jesus would care? Personally, I would think he would be exceedingly happy to have another follower no matter what she took communion with. People who get caught up in the legalisms loose sight of the big picture.
Originally posted by Lanshark
Does anyone, who is Christian, really think Jesus would care?
I strongly disagree with this statement. There is much more to organized religions than this and most of members of organized religions are very tolerant. The problem is that the exceptions tend to be very vocal and so they get most of the attention.Originally posted by phillybeth
Nope, and that is one of my problems with organized religion in general. It's all about who is right, or wrong, and not about tolerance and respect, which is what Jesus taught.
Originally posted by Lanshark
Does anyone, who is Christian, really think Jesus would care? Personally, I would think he would be exceedingly happy to have another follower no matter what she took communion with. People who get caught up in the legalisms loose sight of the big picture.
Originally posted by mom22belles
a question for current practising Catholics. In regards to why the girl didn't just drink the wine? Does the preist not break a small piece of the host and place it in the wine?
It has been many years since I attended mass so my memory could be clouded, but I remember this happening.
My point is if this happens then in fact there would be wheat in the wine (tiny amount) and therefore the girl couldn't have the wine.
Nancy
Originally posted by Patch'sD
Things like this (not allowing the girl communion) and a lot of personal interactions with the Catholic Church have made me walk away from the Church many years ago. I just can't fathom how a religion built on things like Love, honnesty, and compasion can be so callous towards people.
Originally posted by 6_Time_Momma
And I totally respect the fact that you decided the Catholic church was not the right one for you and that you chose to find a different route. I do, however, disagree that the Faith is callous towards people.
Originally posted by auntpolly
[BI don't understand a non-Catholic deciding something we do is wrong! [/B]
Jeepers, do you even know half of the history of the Catholic Church aside from the dogma that you(and I ) have been fed has children. To think of all the things that have gone on over history not just in the last 20 years and then this child cannot receive just like eveyone else!!
I don't find the Catholic Church to be callous. My problem is this: I was taught in order to be a Catholic you have to believe wholeheartedly in the teachings, traditions and practices of the Church, without question. There should not be any "I'm a Catholic but" Catholics- i.e "I'm a Catholic but I belive in birth control", or "I'm a Catholic but I am pro-choice." You either believe in, and follow, everything the Church teaches or you are not Catholic. And I can't be a hypocrite, I can't go to mass and bow my head when I disagree with the Church on many matters.