Mackenzie Click-Mickelson
Chugging along the path of life
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2015
- Messages
- 29,999
In KS our governor has given counties flexibility to move around in each Phase but does not want nor condone counties to move into a different phase before a certain point. As they described it you don't have to move lock step with everyone in so much as the tiers but you shouldn't be moving on in phases. Sooooo that recently caused some political lawmakers in the rural parts (which got a lot more supply early on) to be upset and want to pushback against the governor to force her to allow them to move on in Phase 3 and she's pushing back saying "we should be ready in a few weeks". Excess vaccine supply for counties who have completed Phase 2 are being redirected to counties that are still working on Phase 2. That said I don't know if the residents themselves are upset or if it's just politics being politics simply because of who are governor is. Our governor in her words "fears if one county moves forward alone, people from surrounding areas will seek a COVID-19 vaccine there and create some confusion or chaos." And honestly she's not wrong. We've seen in occur in MO when KC and STL weren't getting vaccines people were driving hours to get it in rural parts, we've seen it in other states too. BUT with this May 1st thing..dunno what's going to happen with that.Yeah, we're seeing that same issue within our state. In a reaction piece about the governor's announcement that everyone will be eligible as of April 5, health authorities in counties around the Detroit area were sort of stunned and a touch horrified because they're still not getting enough supply for the groups already eligible, while some health authorities from northern counties were very excited and said they cannot get enough people to fill their current availability under the existing rules. It seems like it would make more sense to balance those supplies rather than have some counties vaccinating healthy high schoolers while others are still struggling to get seniors and essential workers covered, particularly since the vaccine refusal rates vary quite a bit between rural and urban residents so even opening it up to everyone isn't likely to create a flood of demand in some of the more skeptical places.
And the same would probably apply from state to state, considering how closely attitudes about the vaccine track political views. But I don't think we'll start to see conversations about redirecting supply until a month or so into the "everyone is eligible" effort because it has too much potential to become a political hot-button. In my state, attempts to improve vaccination efforts in underserved communities are already causing controversy, and redirecting unused supplies from rural communities where the politics of grievance rule the day to urban areas where people actually want to be vaccinated is sure to stir up a hornet's nest.
I don't think anyone in my state is upset necessarily with underserved communities at least I haven't heard any rumblings if we're talking about minorities, homeless, disabled or otherwise. The county above me that had started with high risk high contact workers before 65+ are now having walk up appointments for those 65+....which makes sense considering they have a higher minority population. They went after protecting their most vulnerable members first and they are all still in Phase 2 so they didn't do anything they weren't supposed to. The governor just came back from that county and praised them for their efforts in getting equal access opportunities. Her words were: "If we learn enough from you, then we can take this on the road and make sure that all communities are approaching the vaccination in a way that ensures everybody has access in a fair and equitable manner.”
That said the governor is about to have an announcement today. My guess is related to when we'll move onto Phase 3 but we'll see.
You're probably right about the timing about discussion with redirecting between states. If I look at what a PP mentioned above MS they have about the same population as my state and roughly (or close to in respects to the larger picture) amount of total doses administered. But they are moving to 18+..it is because they are getting more doses than we are, it is because they have run out of interest level and now can cover more people more broadly? IDK.