Nancy
Wasting away in Pegulaville
- Joined
- Aug 19, 1999
- Messages
- 24,731
Yeah - Wendy called the FBI examiner a 12 year old. The other woman laughed and said "Did you just call her a 12 year old?" and Wendy said she did and Wendy also called her inexperienced.She called her inexperienced because the FBI Agent Fontaine didn't take a photo of the sticker on the duct tape and was going by the residue left behind. Wendy said that she should've taken a photo. The other woman said "She said she didn't because she was following protocol" (which is what Fontaine said) and that Fontaine went back to take the photo but the sticker was removed. And then Wendy said "Well, she should've taken the photo to begin with.
Ummm ... me thinks Wendy has never had to follow FBI protocol. Fontaine was just doing what she was told to do. I bet if she did otherwise, she'd probably have gotten into huge trouble.
Dr. Kobilinsky is saying that the video of the skull is prejudicial. Says the duct tape is a big question since there's no DNA on it, no proof by state that it was used as the murder weapon. However, in testimony, the forensic anthropologist, Michael Warren states that the position of the mandible was held in place by the duct tape. Mark Nejame just said that the plant growth might've held the mandible in place. But, if the duct tape was there, someone had to have put it there. They all agree that they don't know if the tape was placed pre-mortem, peri-mortem, or post-mortem.
HLN wants to know what we think the duct tape tells us in this case. So ... what do YOU think it tells us?
I think it tells us that someone wanted her to not be able to cry or breath...and when you add it all up there is only 1 person that comes up on the list.