I watched the highlights last night.
Both JVM and NG focused only on Cindy's testimony.
(side bar--the conflict that mother had during this whole ordeal *would* make a compelling story)
Did the state redirect after Jose's cross examine? Specifically regarding George's so-called un-involvement in the 911 call?
I agree with the opinions here that if he did just show up, he would not have any idea what is going on nor have the time to process it.
I know that I go into immediate busy body mode, so if I just arrived home I would be all trying to figure it out if I found a hysterical family member on the phone.
My husband though--you would have to tell him the story several times before he got it--if he just walked into it and was not hearing the events that let up to the moment of hysteria.
As for Cindy "gushing", mentioned up thread....She was simply reminiscing. That does not point to Casey's innocence. It seemed that Baez is not skilled at the cross examine---he should have capatilized on it. The continued focus on George isn't going to get her off. She has noone to back up her story, the defense admits she is a known liar, and on the 911 tapes, she has her opportunity to get the help she needs and she lies her way through it.
Baez is going for "If it does not fit, you must acquit". But he is coming across as:
"If she don't testify, it's a lie"
"By her speaking falsely, you must find her guilty"
So far--there is no magical "glove" that implicates George.
***Very funny Dr. Girlfriend. I Am that way too when I spot people. My husband thinks of me as being silly.