I think it was because Baez stated something in a very factual way about the duct tape being evidence.I couldn't make it out, what was the objection the prosecution raised?
It's REASONABLE doubt. Baez is providing doubt, but I doubt anyone on that jury will find it reasonable.
I missed something, how did Mr. Kronk have Caylee's remains in the first place?
He found them and was supposedly moving them around until the right time to bring them to the attention of the police.
![]()
I think it was because Baez stated something in a very factual way about the duct tape being evidence.![]()
Maybe Mr. Kronk couldn't keep his story straight because he too was molested as a child and it is a defense mechanism for being wronged as a child.
I said this only because I find it interesting that Bozo is expecting honesty from everyone except Casey.
If you drown why put duct tape on her?
How will Bozo explain that George is former law enforcement, isn't it reasonable to assume that he would have been compelled to call 911 or at least maintain composure during a crisis not initiate a cover up. Also- shouldn't George of all people be able to have come up with a better cover up than this????