Casey Anthony NOT GUILTY & Sentencing Thread 6

[PixieDust32]

I think Drew Peterson was arrested for the death of one of his wives, it was a body exhumation and it went from accident to homicide. I don't think he was charged for the second wife, might be wrong.

 

[PixieDust32]

I have a few questions:

Question number 1 -Why didn't the prosecution bring in the "VIDEOTAPE" from jail of Casey getting sick, bending over with stomach pains, when she found out the media found "a" body in the woods near her home? That SCREAMS that she's guilty. When volunteers found bones near another part of Florida she does nothing of the sort, she only got sick and started "heeving" when they found a body near her home. Don't you think that would have been crucial evidence.

Question number 2. On June 16th there were her cell phone "pings" that were in the imediate area of her parents house. She never went to work, never was in Tampa, it was a LIE! Why wasn't that brought up? This gave her plenty of time to kill Caylee at her mothers house.

Question number 3 - Why didn't they bring in the time line of when she borrowed the shovel from a neighbor on June 18th?

The Cell phone pings were brought up but I guess the jury were napping, even Ashton mentioned in one of the interviews, they saw the cell phone pings that put casey in the area near her house, and yes they mentioned that it was enough time, therefore Asthon thought that they jury didn't do their job and they could had asked all questions if they weren't sure.

They also talked about the shovel, but again the jury were in mars.

About the tape, well they thought it would be UNFAIR, WHY??? I don't understand, the whole trial was about poor KC, like if the victim was her!

 

[Kurby]

NEW YORK -- Casey Anthony defense attorney Cheney Mason spoke about his client on NBC's "Today" on Monday morning.

Mason told NBC's Savannah Guthrie that the Anthony family relationship is "pretty well burned."

MORE: Extended Coverage

While he expects Anthony may one day reconcile with her brother, Lee Anthony, Mason said he does not expect the 25-year-old to speak with her parents, George and Cindy Anthony, once she is released from the Orange County Jail.

Last week, a jury found Anthony not guilty of killing her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee Marie Anthony.

Mason said he never believed Anthony killed her daughter.

During the trial, Anthony's defense attorneys claimed she suffered sexual abuse at the hands of her father and brother. On Friday, Anthony declined a jailhouse visit from her mother.

Mason did not say specifically where Casey Anthony will go after she is released from custody. She is expected to leave the jail on July 17.

Anthony, her family and her defense attorneys have received death threats from people upset over the jury's decision.

"We're all concerned about her safety," Mason said.

Read more: http://www.wesh.com/casey-anthony-extended-coverage/28507055/detail.html#ixzz1RqLkiRrb

 

[rie'smom]

I have a few questions:

Question number 1 -Why didn't the prosecution bring in the "VIDEOTAPE" from jail of Casey getting sick, bending over with stomach pains, when she found out the media found "a" body in the woods near her home? That SCREAMS that she's guilty. When volunteers found bones near another part of Florida she does nothing of the sort, she only got sick and started "heeving" when they found a body near her home. Don't you think that would have been crucial evidence.

Question number 2. On June 16th there were her cell phone "pings" that were in the imediate area of her parents house. She never went to work, never was in Tampa, it was a LIE! Why wasn't that brought up? This gave her plenty of time to kill Caylee at her mothers house.

Question number 3 - Why didn't they bring in the time line of when she borrowed the shovel from a neighbor on June 18th?

Those are very good questions for the prosecutors.

 

[Lisa loves Pooh]

Those are very good questions for the prosecutors.

THE video tape was sealed and not permitted. (I don't think they are allowed to mention in trial that they had evidence but weren't allowed to use it.)

They did talk about the shovel timeline. In fact-the neighbor she borrowed it from testified.

They did talk about the pings.


I don't get why people say the prosecution had nothing and why something wasn't mentioned...when it was. Anyone care to explain? (not a snark--but I am over being told that this or that wasn't mentioned--when it clearly was.)

 

[LisaR]

Those are very good questions for the prosecutors.

Were you on the jury? I ask because two of those three things WERE brought up in court but the jury ignored them, as well. They couldn't bring up the video because it had been sealed.

 

[PixieDust32]

THE video tape was sealed and not permitted. (I don't think they are allowed to mention in trial that they had evidence but weren't allowed to use it.)

They did talk about the shovel timeline. In fact-the neighbor she borrowed it from testified.

They did talk about the pings.


I don't get why people say the prosecution had nothing and why something wasn't mentioned...when it was. Anyone care to explain? (not a snark--but I am over being told that this or that wasn't mentioned--when it clearly was.)

 

[PixieDust32]

I noticed that (not only here, but on facebook too) now after the trial many new people are out there asking 'questions' and just repeating the whole "it was not enough evidence' when is more than obvious they didn't follow the case and trial like many of us here had. Many of those 'questions' were talk and were evidence in the trial.

 

[brunette8706]

THE video tape was sealed and not permitted. (I don't think they are allowed to mention in trial that they had evidence but weren't allowed to use it.)

They did talk about the shovel timeline. In fact-the neighbor she borrowed it from testified.

They did talk about the pings.


I don't get why people say the prosecution had nothing and why something wasn't mentioned...when it was. Anyone care to explain? (not a snark--but I am over being told that this or that wasn't mentioned--when it clearly was.)

*
Oh So THEY DID MENTION IT? Okay, thanks! I had no idea, since I didn't watch the whole trial. So the prosecution does mention those issues and the jury still "WASn'T GETTING IT"! UGH!

Not sure why they couldn't put into evidence of her bending over with stomach pains when they found the body!

 

[CurlyGirl]

Juror #12 alleges that half of her coworkers (she's a chef at a supermarket) would like to see her head on a platter.

First off, if I were involved in that trial, I'd tell my boss about it and ask that it be kept on the downlow. I'd ask my boss if we could just say that I needed time off for "medical issues". I would ask that the fact that I'm a chef at a supermarket not be released to the public.

My guess is that she doesn't want co-workers questioning her or she is tired of "How did you guys come to that decision?" comments. I cannot believe that her coworkers would be out for her head. Why can't she just say "Don't ask me anything. I don't want to discuss it and if you bring it up, I'm going to walk away." Nobody's threatened her ... she just chose to take off. I think she's making a mountain out of a molehill and is creating her own fear.

Funny how we hear nothing from any of the other 10 jury members and only from #3 and now #12. The rest must be coping with it somehow ...

 

[brunette8706]

The Cell phone pings were brought up but I guess the jury were napping, even Ashton mentioned in one of the interviews, they saw the cell phone pings that put casey in the area near her house, and yes they mentioned that it was enough time, therefore Asthon thought that they jury didn't do their job and they could had asked all questions if they weren't sure.

They also talked about the shovel, but again the jury were in mars.

About the tape, well they thought it would be UNFAIR, WHY??? I don't understand, the whole trial was about poor KC, like if the victim was her!

*
Thanks PixieDust, for your explanation.

 

[Lisa loves Pooh]

*
Oh So THEY DID MENTION IT? Okay, thanks! I had no idea, since I didn't watch the whole trial. So the prosecution does mention those issues and the jury still "WASn'T GETTING IT"! UGH!

Not sure why they couldn't put into evidence of her bending over with stomach pains when they found the body!

The video was not mention as it wasn't allowed...but that was pretty much covered prior to trial at some point.

But when the neighbor is testifying the shovel and folks asked why it wasn't mentioned...


I will say that Baez had a field day objecting to tons of evidence because it was inflammatory of his client. I swear if they found her fingerprint on something, he still would have objected to it. I think his definition of inflammatory is--it shows my client is guilty.

But I think the legal definition is somewhere along the lines is that it shows someone might be guilty even though it in and of itself is not evidence. But I am only guessing at that.

What's done was done. It wasn't allowed and that is that. Folks want to blame the state for that. But it was a judge who sealed it, said no--and there was nothing the state could do about it. It is not evidence of them not doing their job.

 

[CurlyGirl]

I don't get why people say the prosecution had nothing and why something wasn't mentioned...when it was. Anyone care to explain? (not a snark--but I am over being told that this or that wasn't mentioned--when it clearly was.)

OMG - I soooo hear you on this!!!!

 

[rie'smom]

Were you on the jury? I ask because two of those three things WERE brought up in court but the jury ignored them, as well. They couldn't bring up the video because it had been sealed.

No, were you? I watched the trial however, every once in a while I had to run to run to the grocery store or put clothes in the washer or dryer.

I noticed that (not only here, but on facebook too) now after the trial many new people are out there asking 'questions' and just repeating the whole "it was not enough evidence' when is more than obvious they didn't follow the case and trial like many of us here had. Many of those 'questions' were talk and were evidence in the trial.

Repeat: I watched the trial however, every once in a while I had to run to run to the grocery store or put clothes in the washer or dryer.

Did you watch every second of the trial?

 

[Bella the Ball 360]

I keep thinking if the jurors were so torn WHY did they not go for a hung jury? The foreman said he is sick about the verdict. If he was so sick was was he not a hold out.

 

[brunette8706]

This picture was taken of Caylee the day before she was murdered. Does she look "TERRIFIED" or "SCARED" to you, or is it just me?

http://www.acandyrose.com/caylee_anthony-0211-Caylee061508.jpg

 

[joviroxx]

THE video tape was sealed and not permitted. (I don't think they are allowed to mention in trial that they had evidence but weren't allowed to use it.)

They did talk about the shovel timeline. In fact-the neighbor she borrowed it from testified.

They did talk about the pings.


I don't get why people say the prosecution had nothing and why something wasn't mentioned...when it was. Anyone care to explain? (not a snark--but I am over being told that this or that wasn't mentioned--when it clearly was.)

I noticed that (not only here, but on facebook too) now after the trial many new people are out there asking 'questions' and just repeating the whole "it was not enough evidence' when is more than obvious they didn't follow the case and trial like many of us here had. Many of those 'questions' were talk and were evidence in the trial.

I venture to say a large majority of people that are doling out opinions have did not watch the trial and have no idea of what kind of evidence there was. Its also obvious from the lack of knowledge of the charges as well.


I get the idea behind inflammatory. The only thing that is amusing is while Jose Baez fought tooth and nail against possible inflammatory evidence, his OS was one huge inflammatory accusation.

 

[Bella the Ball 360]

This picture was taken of Caylee the day before she was murdered. Does she look "TERRIFIED" or "SCARED" to you, or is it just me?

http://www.acandyrose.com/caylee_anthony-0211-Caylee061508.jpg

I don't think she looks like tht I think she just looks like she is cuddling.

 

[CurlyGirl]

On NGrace, they played part of someone (JMV maybe?) saying that Juror #12 said that she'd rather go to jail than sit on a jury like that one.

Why? What was so bad about that jury in particular? If she couldn't give the death penalty and that troubled her, she had no right to be on that jury. Was it too long? Too drawn out?

The foreperson said he was "there was a feeling of disgust knowing that my signature and hers were going to be there, on the same sheet." And he says many jurors thought Casey killed Caylee.

Then WHY not fight and say "This is wrong, we really need to look at this more! What do we need to clarify? What are we missing? Let's sit down and sort through this piece by piece and see if we can't put this puzzle together"?

 

[LisaR]

No, were you? I watched the trial however, every once in a while I had to run to run to the grocery store or put clothes in the washer or dryer.



Repeat: I watched the trial however, every once in a while I had to run to run to the grocery store or put clothes in the washer or dryer.

Did you watch every second of the trial?

You are the one that seems to feel, like the jurors, that there wasn't enough evidence presented. When someone asks about evidence, you indicate that it is a good question for the prosecution. This isn't the first time. It leads one to believe that if the juror saw some of this evidence, maybe they would have come to a different decision. The problem is, they did hear that evidence. Aside from a videotape showing Casey killing Caylee, there will be 12 people, okay 13, that won't be convinced any other way.