Holy carp! Porn industry has standards! What is this world coming to!
"Hirsch -- who reached out to Anthony's lawyer yesterday in the hopes of landing a deal -- has now reversed course ... telling TMZ, "It has become obvious to us that Vivid fans, and people in general, want nothing to do with her and that includes a XXX movie."
Hirsch explains, "We were ready to make an offer to Casey to star in one of our feature films. It's clear to me now, however, that there has been an overwhelmingly negative response to our offer and so we've decided to withdraw it."
He adds, "We now believe that we underestimated the emotional response that people are having to the verdict. A movie starring Casey Anthony is not what people want to see."
That's sort of poetic justice....
WHAT????? The jurors voted NOT GUILTY and now THEY are sick to their stomachs? Am I reading that correctly?
I guess that meant they felt she was not innocent but not guilty of the charges set before them? I hope that is what it means or else I am beyond confused. It also goes totally against what the alternate juror said.
Not guilty of child abuse, check,
liar, check,
getting paid to say it? yup....
I don't feel sorry for them one bit. They could have found her guilty of aggravated manslaughter of a child if they thought the state didn't prove "murder." The jury has said they do not think Casey was responsible in the slightest for Caylee's death. IIRC, the mother who left her child at home alone, and the child was crushed to death by a dresser, was charged with aggravated manslaughter of a child.
They could have thought about a lot of things, apparently the winking juror was thinking for all of them.
I don't think your opinions are irrational. What set me off was a post I read on another thread that ripped into the prosecution. I didn't want to respond on that thread so I came here instead. I don't have a problem with anyone that disagrees with my opinion. I am simply trying to figure out how someone can clearly get away with, at minimum, knowing what happened to her child and not have to answer for it.
Everywhere I go I see people bashing the Prosecution, even on this thread, saying they should be fired.
I'm sorry I don't believe this guy at all. I don't believe George knew anything about Caylee being dead, I don't belieave he would have thrown her out like the daily trash
I think George felt Casey had done something. He knew what that smell in the trunk was, he then realized his granddaughter was missing, I'm sure he held out hope they would find her alive. I don't think Casey ever told either of them that Caylee was dead.... Being a grandparent you hold out hope.
I didn't have a problem with them not speaking after the verdict if they chose to be anonymous. I have a problem that the very next day they are out SELLING their story. That tells me a lot about them right there.
Selling to the highest bidder....
Maybe they should have taken a closer look IMO ...
I think you're right obviously....
Juror #3 said "If you cannot prove what the crime was, you cannot determine what the punishment should be."
Ummm ... deciding punishment wasn't their job!!! The judge never instructed them to consider punishment in the verdict!!
Love how juror #3 wanted to be on this case. Did she see $$ signs?
She was thinking about the punishment? Doesn't that go against judges instruction?
Glad she's already cashed in, anybody know how much ABC paid her?
I am 100% convinced they wanted a smoking gun. They wanted absolute solid proof that Casey did it. Something that tied her directly to it without a doubt. Maybe a photo of Casey holding chloroform up to Caylee's face? Maybe video of Caylee chugging a well labeled bottle of Xanax?
Thing is, if the prosecution had such clear-cut evidence, Casey would've been begging for a plea bargain!
I had a very strong feeling about that almost from the start... I just kept hoping I was wrong.
I have a couple of questions
first, anyone know where Casey will go.....Home with JB?
Did anyone else hear she said she wants another baby?
Anyone hear Ashton on the View...did he say anything of merit
Juror 3 said that they were sick with the verdict...why didn't they speak to the media and say that
If they find out the jurors acted inappropriately can they retry Casey?
I assume Baez will represent her in whatever offers come her way and he will take care of her housing in the interim, just a guess... I did hear Ashton, he doesn't second guess the case they put on, he obviously doesn't agree with the outcome and his retirement was already in the works but he put it on hold until he could conclude this case.