PKS44,
Perhaps the transportation costs are calculated as a percentage of the total costs?
So, if BCV has 5% of all the units served and BWV has 10% of all the units serviced by transportaion, then the pro-rated costs for BWV would be double that of BCV? Forgive me if I'm using the wrong terminology.
I don't think that it is a simple matter of one resort subsidizing the other. It's probably just based on the number of rooms at each resort.
I know it's frustrating to have poor bus service when paying so much for that service.
If Disney is not willing to separate the route, I think they need to ADD more buses to the entire route. And the additional total expense should be divided among ALL the resorts (and their proportionate # of rooms) and not just the
DVC resorts.
The only problem I can forsee is that Disney probably has some sort of agreement with the Swan and Dolphin to provide transportation either at no cost or at a fixed cost.
So, therefore if Disney added buses to the entire route, they might have to absorb a large portion of the added costs. Even though, the Swan and Dolphin would greatly benefit from the added buses, they may not have to pay any addition $$ to support it.
The other Disney resorts and the DVC resort would have to pick up the total tab for the added transportation. Now if they did this fairly and divided among all the non-S&D resort rooms it still might be worth it. However, dues would definitely go up at both DVC resorts.
Personally, I think that WDW should pick up some (even a token percentage would be appreciated) of the addition costs of added buses because it very well may be their previous agreements with the S&D that is putting strain on the bus system by not allowing expansion.
Note: Such an agreement with S&D is purely speculation on my part. But I think it makes sense.