THis is what I also said:
***"Pardon me, but candidates speak at Bob Jones or visit the 700 Club looking for political endorsement. That's not an exercise of freedom of religion or the the right to privacy. What a candidate seeks for political purposes is fair game politically."***
You can't see the difference between seeking a political endorsement and saying one's religious faith is the basis for one's desire to do good? Really, there's no difference to you? What a revelation. Now it all makes sense.
He can do it all he wants. Any candidate can do that. What you have no right to do is demand to know what went on between him and his pastor. That's none of your business. That's the right to privacy. That's what I said.
The right to privacy means you don't get to pry, not someone else doesn't get to share if they choose.
Specifically, what do you have a problem with in that brochure? The fact that it goes to prove he's not a Muslim? The fact that he believes his faith plays a part in wanting to provide healthcare or help the poor? What do you object to?
Don't regurgitate what I said or what you think I said. I want to know what your problem is with the message in that brochure. Please specifically explain it to me and the good folks here.
Like I said, anytime you want to spearhead the movement to get all religion out of politics, please do and sign me up.
I don't want to further embarass the poster so the best I can say is it's somewhere in this thread. You'll have to look for it assuming they didn't remove it.
