When did they say that? I know they have said its down for all time highs just before the pandemic but don't remember seeing a number put to it.Disney’s own data shows actual park attendance is down 17%.
When did they say that? I know they have said its down for all time highs just before the pandemic but don't remember seeing a number put to it.Disney’s own data shows actual park attendance is down 17%.
"We didn’t have a reservation system and we didn’t control the number of annual passes ... the annual pass as a value was so great that people were literally coming all the time and the accessibility of the park was unlimited to them"
It is a great idea, hopefully someday...Also, if they had any desire to provide a balanced AP product for DVC members and other guests that visit more than once a year, it would be simple for them to create an AP that is tied to resort stays, like so many have suggested. It would provide excellent flexibility for the guests, and guaranteed multiple level revenue stream for Disney.
Yes, what you say is correct.
In his statement he says "But at the same time, we’ve got to make sure that there’s room in the park for the family from Denver that comes once every five years. We didn’t have a reservation system and we didn’t control the number of annual passes we distributed and frankly, the annual pass as a value was so great that people were literally coming all the time and the accessibility of the park was unlimited to them and that family from Denver would get to the park and not be let in."
He is saying that the reason that the family cannot get into the park is because there is not enough room in the park... in other words the park is at FULL capacity based solely on attendance.
But that is not the case at all, by their own data.
When you say "they like that the park reservations system is allowing them to control attendance differently than before they had it", you are correct, it is about control.
Now, we all love it when the lines are shorter.
For the guest, it means they get on the ride quicker.
For Disney, it means the guests get off the rides quicker, allowing more time for in park shopping and eating.
When you say "the goal is to keep crowds at a lower level than before", you are correct.
So when that family cannot get in, it is because Disney has lowered the level of access, not that demand maxed out the park capacity.
You are correct when you say "that revenue is still up as prices are now higher than before, so they have what they see as system that allows them to do things they couldn’t before..."
What they have done is lower the supply, which artificially increases the demand, thus allowing them to increase the prices.
So even if the family can get in, they have to pay a higher price. They may have to change from once every 5 years to once every 7 or 8 years.
When you say "The statement at the end says it all. When demand goes down, then they will know they need to change things." you are correct.
But in the context of his statement, the "demand" is purposely implied to be about attendance.
The actual "demand" is about the guests who are willing to pay more for less.
When the guests stop paying, "then they will know they need to change things."
So, just a long way of saying that everything he said was correct, except the narrative that the problem is that there is no room in the park.
Under the current system, if anyone cannot get into the park, that is solely because Disney is controlling the access and lowering the supply.
I fully understand it from a business perspective, but not from a customer service perspective.
.
I would think he was referring to pre-reservation times when parks around the holidays would shut down. I thought that only happened a few times a year though.He is saying that the reason that the family cannot get into the park is because there is not enough room in the park... in other words the park is at FULL capacity based solely on attendance.
But that is not the case at all, by their own data.
Then they need to make a distinction between DVC/hotel using AP holders and the locals who drive in all the time, so I think we're in agreement on that.sounds like the real target are the FL resident APs. The APs are too cheap and make it easy for spontaneous drop-ins. I don’t see that has a “traveling AP” problem because those traveling AP holders can’t just drop-in so the park is not “unlimited” to them.
His statement also supports the idea locals on average don’t spend as much as infrequent visitors. If they did, he wouldn’t care about them coming all the time.
If he allows DeSantis to go through with changing the relationship with the State, does he gets to rewrite resident AP rules?
When did they say that? I know they have said its down for all time highs just before the pandemic but don't remember seeing a number put to it.
Thanks."Recent price hikes at Disney's theme parks have seen the company's profits surge despite a slump in visitors - leading many to accuse the parks of ripping off loyal customers in order to bolster their bottom line.
Since reopening in April of last year, the company has made a host of changes to its preeminent parks in Florida and California, nixing free perks and ramping up prices, causing the cost of a visit to a Disney resort to rise dramatically.
Visitor numbers at the park have plunged by 17 per cent - but the profit Disney makes on each guest has increased by 17 per cent in a year, helping turbocharge the firm's profits."
[Emphasis added.] (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-park-profits-jump-five-fold-2-2-billion.html, Daily Mail, pub. 28 August 2022, accessed 29 August 2022.)
You can have a good time without the extras especially for us DVC'ers where it's not the end of the world if you don't get on a ride this trip. We survived fine last week of Aug. without paying a penny extra for G+ or ILL. The crowds were a bit less than the summer and it made for a much much better overall trip.Then they need to make a distinction between DVC/hotel using AP holders and the locals who drive in all the time, so I think we're in agreement on that.
I feel like the reservation system, the limited hopping, and the relatively (in our experience) limited availability of Genie+ have really reduced what we can do in the parks, which means we don't want to go as often, which means we're not spending as much money there.
I did some back of a napkin math on ILL revenue when it first came out, based on my own (albeit) limited observations, and there is $$$$$ rolling into Disney's coffers.
Just prior the “normal” attendance figures were 2019.Thanks.
I can't tell from that article what year they are comparing to though. Can you? A 17% drop from when is my question.
Right. Sure, you show your ID.Has nothing to do with IT, though. Showing ID along with proof of eligibility is part of the rules.
Take DVC out of it…it’s the requirement of an AP as well.
exactly.....link the purchase of an AP to an actual resort stay.....level the playing field.....Then they need to make a distinction between DVC/hotel AP holders and the locals who drive in all the time
As an out-of-state non-DVC AP holder, I like this idea, since I always stay onsite at WDW, however, there are certainly a lot of local FL residents for whom being near WDW was a major motivation in their moving to FL.exactly.....link the purchase of an AP to an actual resort stay.....level the playing field.....
But my point is your MB just says DVC. There are like six categories of DVC points, but only two current categories of member (blue or white). And yet the MB, and their system in general, can't tell if you are white or blue. It's how non-blue people got sorcerer passes last year.
I believe that’s what got them sued. This is basically Disney creating a problem (reservations and limited spots) and selling the fix (higher ticket cost and limited AP to drive down attendance but increase profits).But what I don’t understand with all this ridiculous talk about the “family from Denver” is that with the reservation system you select which group you belong to… AP are counted separately. If this is such a “problem” then limit AP reservations… not the sale of AP’s.
I must be missing something.