Disney8704 said:I havent read many of the posts since my last post cuz I've been sick for the past 2 days, still sick infact,
Sorry you're sick!!Are you feeling better now?
![]()
Disney8704 said:I havent read many of the posts since my last post cuz I've been sick for the past 2 days, still sick infact,
Sorry you're sick!!Are you feeling better now?
![]()
ElizabethB said:If I were planning a trip with family, I would absolutely buy the DDP for precisely the reason others do -- so we could pre-pay for meals and enjoy a nice dinner each day without having to worry about who's eating what, splitting the bill, etc. Plus, Dad (a depression-era child) won't eat anything in a restaurant, generally. However, if he knows I've already pre-paid, and he can have what he wants, he'll eat. And, that counts for a lot with me. So, I would definitely do DDP with family.
Let me try to explain it a different way. How does this benefit me, personally? It basically means I have to work hard, every morning of my vacation, to secure the ADRs I wish. That sounds like a very bad thing. I see no personal advantage in this suggestion.Disney8704 said:OK maybe not completely get rid of ADRs. But it should be to where you can only make ADRs for that day when you get to the park but only if you want to.
You hit it right on the head there Dean... I agree completely..DiszyDean said:I have read through the thread and not sure I understand the complaints..
1. Disney offers the DDP (free or otherwise ) because there is some advantage to them in doing so. Disney is first and foremost a business and a lot of the magic they provide is to keep you coming back for more and to fill their hotels/parks with paying customers. Trust me in that no one is "Ripping off the mouse".
2. I think someone else previously mentioned that there are still signature dining establishments within Disney that are not part of the dining plan. There are very few true 4 and 5 star resteraunts within Disney. There are certainly better places to go than Disney if you are that interested in fine dining. Places like Le Cellier, Coral Reef, Concourse are all very nice places but no where near fine dining and people should not expect the type of food or service there that you would get at a true fine dining establishment.
3. ADRs for the more popular resteraunts are just a fact of life. With or without the Dining Plan, this would be true. This argument does not really hold water. If you do not like to plan your meals, I can understand but be prepared for the consequences because this will not change.
Disney8704 said:OK maybe not completely get rid of ADRs. But it should be to where you can only make ADRs for that day when you get to the park but only if you want to.
DiszyDean said:Places like Le Cellier, Coral Reef, Concourse are all very nice places but no where near fine dining and people should not expect the type of food or service there that you would get at a true fine dining establishment.
bicker said:Let me try to explain it a different way. How does this benefit me, personally? It basically means I have to work hard, every morning of my vacation, to secure the ADRs I wish. That sounds like a very bad thing. I see no personal advantage in this suggestion.
Now I focused on what would or wouldn't be a personal advantage to me, because I wanted to demonstrate how little personal preferences really matter. Just because something is good or bad for me or for you is practically meaningless. What matters is what's going to make the most amount of the highest revenue-generating guests happy the most. There really is no reason to believe that the ADR system, as it is, doesn't do that. A change such as you're suggesting will almost surely cause a lot of such guests a lot of frustration and perhaps even anger.
It is always "going on." It isn't always free, but just try to make a reservation at a time nobody will be there on the DP.bassoon2 said:wait a sec...if i was super rich I would GO when DDP was not going on!![]()