You are right, stronger economy equals more persons handing the guy money.
Thanks
Do you have sources telling us how many homeless persons file income tax returns?
Just curious
Isn't it "people"????
You are right, stronger economy equals more persons handing the guy money.
Thanks
Do you have sources telling us how many homeless persons file income tax returns?
Just curious
Funny thing is, that McCains plan would take more of that waiters tips to redistribute than Obamas would.
The unfunny thing is, that Obama's plan would increase the amount that the homeless guy would get. For doing nothing.
The homeless, the people who pay zero taxes and the chronically unemployed get a great opportunity to vote themselves a raise on November 4th
Audrey has done next to nothing toward her degree. She played while I
worked my tail off!'
The father sheepishly smiled, winked and said gently, 'Welcome to the
Republican party.'
[/B]
I don't want your hard earned money. I voted McCain already.[/URL]![]()
I'm sorry that's a stupid story and a lame example. Do you honestly believe that everyone that can't make ends meet isn't working hard enough?
Because I know a lot of people working their tails off for minimum wage or even as much as $10 an hour that can't make ends meet. Not everyone can get a college degree and a white collar job. And quite frankly I'm grateful there are people in the world willing to do the dirty jobs - things like trash collectors, busing tables, cleaning hospitals or public restrooms, waiting on me at the local Whataburger, roofing construction etc. I dare anyone to say those people aren't working hard. But those are crap jobs that come with a crap salary. But without these people doing these jobs - most of us would have a heck of a different life.
Yes there will be some people that will take advantage of the system. There are always people that do. But by and large most people work hard - that just doesn't guarantee they'll win the race.
I'm sorry that's a stupid story and a lame example. Do you honestly believe that everyone that can't make ends meet isn't working hard enough?
Because I know a lot of people working their tails off for minimum wage or even as much as $10 an hour that can't make ends meet. Not everyone can get a college degree and a white collar job. And quite frankly I'm grateful there are people in the world willing to do the dirty jobs - things like trash collectors, busing tables, cleaning hospitals or public restrooms, waiting on me at the local Whataburger, roofing construction etc. I dare anyone to say those people aren't working hard. But those are crap jobs that come with a crap salary. But without these people doing these jobs - most of us would have a heck of a different life.
Yes there will be some people that will take advantage of the system. There are always people that do. But by and large most people work hard - that just doesn't guarantee they'll win the race.
I agree. It is a very lame story.
Why? You don't think there's some truth to it? You don't think some people would react that way?
I think it's a great example of the disconnect between the idea of giving away something that is the product of someone else's hard work versus giving away the product of your own hard work.
On another thread a poster said they would be happy to give more under Obama's plan (they're over the $250K). I asked if they ever voluntarily gave more in taxes than they were legally obligated to and/or if they ever declined taking any deductions or credits they were entitled to. Either they didn't see the question or they declined to answer it.
I'm sorry that's a stupid story and a lame example. Do you honestly believe that everyone that can't make ends meet isn't working hard enough?
Because I know a lot of people working their tails off for minimum wage or even as much as $10 an hour that can't make ends meet. Not everyone can get a college degree and a white collar job. And quite frankly I'm grateful there are people in the world willing to do the dirty jobs - things like trash collectors, busing tables, cleaning hospitals or public restrooms, waiting on me at the local Whataburger, roofing construction etc. I dare anyone to say those people aren't working hard. But those are crap jobs that come with a crap salary. But without these people doing these jobs - most of us would have a heck of a different life.
Yes there will be some people that will take advantage of the system. There are always people that do. But by and large most people work hard - that just doesn't guarantee they'll win the race.

Why? You don't think there's some truth to it? You don't think some people would react that way?
I think it's a great example of the disconnect between the idea of giving away something that is the product of someone else's hard work versus giving away the product of your own hard work.
On another thread a poster said they would be happy to give more under Obama's plan (they're over the $250K). I asked if they ever voluntarily gave more in taxes than they were legally obligated to and/or if they ever declined taking any deductions or credits they were entitled to. Either they didn't see the question or they declined to answer it.
If effort and salary really were that directly linked, it would be one thing. To assume that making more money means you're working harder than someone who makes less is kind of arrogant. As someone pointed out, we NEED people to pick up trash, clean public restrooms, etc. Folks making under $250,000 are still not going to rolling in it---but maybe their kids will be healthy and able to be successful in school so their generation will be able to contribute more in taxes for the next generation.
If effort and salary really were that directly linked, it would be one thing. To assume that making more money means you're working harder than someone who makes less is kind of arrogant. As someone pointed out, we NEED people to pick up trash, clean public restrooms, etc. Folks making under $250,000 are still not going to rolling in it---but maybe their kids will be healthy and able to be successful in school so their generation will be able to contribute more in taxes for the next generation.
So, I guess it was lucky for you that your neighbors didn't share your POV on sharing the wealth, huh?![]()
I know...it's different, they chose to give after all. But the irony was just too good to pass up.
Today on my way to lunch I passed a homeless guy with a sign that
read "Vote Obama, I need the money." I laughed.
Once in the restaurant my server had on a "Obama 08" tie, again I laughed
as he had given away his political preference--just imagine the coincidence.
When the bill came I decided not to tip the server and explained to him that
I was exploring the Obama redistribution of wealth concept. He stood there
in disbelief while I told him that I was going to redistribute his tip to someone who
I deemed more in need--the homeless guy outside.
The server angrily stormed from my sight.
I went outside, gave the homeless guy $10 and told him to thank the server inside as
I've decided he could use the money more. The homeless guy was very grateful.
At the end of my rather unscientific redistribution experiment I realized the
homeless guy was very grateful for the money he did not earn,
but the waiter was pretty angry that I gave away the money he did earn
Even though the actual recipient deserved money more.
I guess redistribution of wealth is an easier thing to swallow in concept than
in practical application.
OR IS IT.........REDISTRIBUTION OF SOMEONE ELSE'S WEALTH IS A GREAT IDEA.............
or just a fools game !!