Mackenzie Click-Mickelson
Chugging along the path of life
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2015
- Messages
- 30,048
When you move in you enter yourself into a sticky situation (romantic, roommate or even parental). Statistically speaking those who cohabitate (in romantic relationships) due to fianances have a lower sucess rate for a relationship. Also if a break up occurs and you haven't been adequately accounting for that you may find yourself actually homeless and with little finances to get yourself back up on your feet. That however is a whole 'nother topic. In terms of retirement funds if you're moving in for finances you're probably not even thinking about your retirement funds to begin with lol. But it is possible to contribute to a 401K, live separately and whatnot, you may not be contributing as much as the prior poster's child is at that exact moment but that's what kick started the tangent anyways.I am not only talking about romantic relationships. I guess I should have had a slashtag to differentiate friendship. Such as, when I graduated college, I had a specific friend that I knew I could move in with.
Although, if you're in a commited romantic relationship and you're trying to save money, NOT living together makes no sense. Why pay for TWO apartments when you're going to spend a ton of time at one or the other anyway? I had a roommate who did that and she literally was never at our apartment! What a waste of retirement money!
I would count co-living as roommates then if you're not speaking about romantic relationships. That's actually why I think it's more atypical because most find living with roommates as not a big deal even if they come with their own issues, but couch surfing and living in your car isn't the same as roommates.