Not trying to be a beer snob at all. Just that people used to drinking BMC will be awfully surprised at how fast a good Belgian can sneak up on you.
Jim
Thanks for your response. I am sure my post does speak of my attitude towards exposing children towards drunk people. Nothing good comes from over imbibing. People lose their inhibitions and self control. They urinate in public (mostly the men-haha), trip over strollers, fall into people, act rude and obnoxious, vomit and disturb other guests' meal/vacation/sleep/good time/whatever. It is not a "very, very narrow view," it is more common than I'm sure you realize. Sadly, as a guest of WDW I am sometimes a prisoner of my own surroundings and yes, we eat mediocre food while we are there. That said, we also drink alcohol but that doesn't change my opinion that this will likely change the atmosphere at the MK.
Edited to add: why do people find it strange to want to follow the express wishes of founder of the company who has only been gone since the 60's but think we should follow the exact words of the Constitution that were written 200+ years, or the Bible written even longer ago?
Thanks for your response. I am sure my post does speak of my attitude towards exposing children towards drunk people. Nothing good comes from over imbibing. People lose their inhibitions and self control. They urinate in public (mostly the men-haha), trip over strollers, fall into people, act rude and obnoxious, vomit and disturb other guests' meal/vacation/sleep/good time/whatever. It is not a "very, very narrow view," it is more common than I'm sure you realize. Sadly, as a guest of WDW I am sometimes a prisoner of my own surroundings and yes, we eat mediocre food while we are there. That said, we also drink alcohol but that doesn't change my opinion that this will likely change the atmosphere at the MK.
Edited to add: why do people find it strange to want to follow the express wishes of founder of the company who has only been gone since the 60's but think we should follow the exact words of the Constitution that were written 200+ years, or the Bible written even longer ago?
Thanks for your response. I am sure my post does speak of my attitude towards exposing children towards drunk people. Nothing good comes from over imbibing. People lose their inhibitions and self control. They urinate in public (mostly the men-haha), trip over strollers, fall into people, act rude and obnoxious, vomit and disturb other guests' meal/vacation/sleep/good time/whatever. It is not a "very, very narrow view," it is more common than I'm sure you realize. Sadly, as a guest of WDW I am sometimes a prisoner of my own surroundings and yes, we eat mediocre food while we are there. That said, we also drink alcohol but that doesn't change my opinion that this will likely change the atmosphere at the MK.
Edited to add: why do people find it strange to want to follow the express wishes of founder of the company who has only been gone since the 60's but think we should follow the exact words of the Constitution that were written 200+ years, or the Bible written even longer ago?
Edited to add: why do people find it strange to want to follow the express wishes of founder of the company who has only been gone since the 60's but think we should follow the exact words of the Constitution that were written 200+ years, or the Bible written even longer ago?
Can we please keep this discussion grounded in the change to allow limited quantities of beer and wine at BoG during the dinner hours only? Otherwise, the discussion falls off the rails, gets too personal, and ends up having nothing whatsoever to do with WDW and addresses alcohol in society in general. And when that happens, the mods will step in and close the discussion. For good reason.
So....with that introduction, Waltgirl, is it really your opinion that the extremely small number of adults with ADRs at BoG, (less than 1% of all people in the park), who choose to drink beer or wine at a dinner with a two drink limit will lead to:
drunk people;
over imbibing;
loss of inhibitions;
loss of self control;
urinating in public
tripping over strollers;
falling into people;
acting rude, and obnoxious;
vomiting ; and/or
disturbing other guests' meal/vacation/sleep/good time?
Because if you do, then you must have access to a whole different set of data than most of the world when it comes to the impact of two glasses of beer and/or wine (with alcohol percentages of between 5%-14%). And if you don't really think that two beers or two glasses of wine leads to all of this mayhem, then why bring it up? Why the hyperbole? If you want to start a thread about Epcot during F&W, or Ragland Road on St. Patrick's Day, fine. Have at it. But there is absolutely no reason to believe that the newly minted rules for BoG will have any impact on the atmosphere of the park whatsoever. If you went to WDW last month and did not notice any measurable degradation in the atmosphere of the MK from the guests who had dinner at places that have no two drink limit such as Citricos and/or the California Grill ,who then headed over to the MK after dinner, then you will not notice any degradation in the atmosphere from the similar number of people who dine at BoG and enjoy a glass of Burgundy with said dinner.
If your argument is one of zero tolerance because that is what you believe Walt Disney wanted, then fine. That is a rational basis to resist change. But a fear that the MK is going to turn into Sodom is simply not supported by any facts, because many, many people who roam around the MK after 5:00 pm now, (and since the ribbon was cut in 1971), have done so after a couple of drinks obtained at resort bars or restaurants. The extra 200 adults to whom BoG serves beer and wine each night are not going to change what you have already been witnessing. If a person is allowed to return to the MK after having a drink at Citrico's, why shouldn't a person be allowed to enjoy the MK after having a drink at BoG?
Do you know which WDW theme park leads in attendance for the past 5, 10 or 15 years? How about leads in attendance wordwide?
How Booze Built America.
Mike Rowe is thirsty. Really thirsty. And after doing hundreds of dirty jobs, who can blame him? In Discovery’s brand-new three-part series HOW BOOZE BUILT AMERICA, premiering on Wednesday, Sept.19, at 10 p.m. ET/PT (and airing on the following two Wednesdays), host Mike Rowe takes a break from the dirty jobs … and takes a seat at the bar.
Did you know that the Puritans landed the Mayflower early on Plymouth Rock … because they ran out of beer? Or that Johnny Appleseed was actually creating farms to sell hard apple cider? Mike Rowe does, and he’ll walk you through all of this and more. He’s proven that dirty jobs can be fun. He’s ready to do the same for history.
Edited to add: why do people find it strange to want to follow the express wishes of founder of the company who has only been gone since the 60's but think we should follow the exact words of the Constitution that were written 200+ years, or the Bible written even longer ago?
I guess because the second is the figurative bedrock on which this nation is founded, the law of the land, the eternal principles for which generations of citizens have offered and given their lives to protect. The last enshrines the words and laws for living from what billions of people believe to be the creator of the universe, the giver of all life, and giver of a love so great He would redeem us from death; a book even ardent non-believers think has much to offer.
The first are the business decisions of the builder of an amusement park.
Facing the fact that I just took time to write that, I'm opening the bar. I'm making Pimm's punch, should anyone in the Eastern time zone be thirsty.
Yes. But how is that question the least bit relevant to either my post, or this topic in general? Are you suggesting that the MK is #1 due to its prohibition of alcohol? And are you suggesting that serving a couple glasses of wine to a few adults during dinner is going to change that?
Consider this scenario. My DW and I go to the MK with my brother and his wife. Alcohol is not served at BoG. It comes time for dinner and we each have different plans. My wife and I go to Citricos at 6:30 and split a bottle of wine with dinner, and my brother and his wife go to Narcoossees and each have two beers with dinner. We meet back up at the MK main entrance at 8:30 and enjoy the MK until it closes at 11:00 pm.
Now consider this scenario. My DW and I go to the MK with my brother and his wife. Beer and wine are served at BoG. It comes time for dinner and we each have different plans. My wife and I go to Citricos at 6:30 and split a bottle of wine with dinner, and my brother and his wife go to BoG and each have two beers with dinner. We meet back up at the MK in front of the castle at 8:30 and enjoy the MK until it closes at 11:00 pm.
Please explain for me how scenario #2 is going to result in a measurable degradation of the atmosphere of the MK. Sorry. You can't.
Yes, Magic Kingdom is number one because of Walt Disneys vision. Why do you think Walt prohibited alcohol from being sold in MK during a time when drinking in public was widely accepted? Why did Walt not listen to Auggie Busch and turn away millions of investment dollars for such a harmless vice?
Some families want to show kids how to have fun in a simple way without a social lubricant. I know its kind of corny ..a little like Mayberry or Fantasy Land. It also sold more tickets than any other theme park in the world. Walt simply made kids and family the priority.
You mention different scenarios for the convenience of adults . do you have kids?
I disagree.
I have a family. I have children. I am a DVC owner and have heavily invested in WDW. I am a Disney lover.
I did not come to love WDW, nor choose to purchase DVC, because of Walt's vision. I love Disney for what it is, how it has evolved and what it continues to grow to be.
I have been able to teach my children strong morals and good values in spite of the fact that we also frequent Epcot, DHS and AK. None of us needs a social lubricant.
I was fine with the MK being dry. I am also fine with wine and beer being served at a nice TS restaurant.
It truly isn't the end of the world as you know it.
Get a Grip.
Yes, Magic Kingdom is number one because of Walt Disney’s vision. Why do you think Walt prohibited alcohol from being sold in MK during a time when drinking in public was widely accepted? Because Walt wanted a park without people walking around with 20 oz cups of beer. It isn't any more complicated than that. And that won't change.Why did Walt not listen to Auggie Busch and turn away millions of investment dollars for such a harmless vice? Same answer. He didn't want people walking around with cans and cups of Bud. And they won't now.
Some families want to show kids how to have fun in a simple way without a social lubricant. Are these the same people who hop from the MK to Epcot? When you can prove to me that there is an appreciable number of people who only go to the MK and eschew every other park due to the presence of alcohol, then I will start to follow your line of thinking. But as long as all these self-righteous people continue to go to AK, then your argument has no credibility.I know its kind of corny…..a little like Mayberry or Fantasy Land. It also sold more tickets than any other theme park in the world. Because it is the original park, the most fun park and the best park, irrespective of having a glass of wine with dinner.Walt simply made kids and family the priority.
You mention different scenarios for the convenience of adults…. do you have kids?