Are you asking why I brought it up? If so, because I think several on this thread are off base in their assessment of the situation. I do believe I have as much right to guess at the situation as you.
Yes, you do. But do others the courtesy of respecting their opinions rather than dismissing them with a snide comment like "Are you familiar with the timeshare laws in each state in which DVC does business?"
As for the original discussion, I'll grant that it may not have legally been possible to send mailers to every single member with SSR-like details on AKV. However, DVC
should have been able to prepare more detailed materials to be sent on request to members living in approved states. If DVC is approved to sell, they were certainly approved to present something a little more "warm and fuzzy" than a POS. Capice?
jbrowna said:
Those who have bought are being asked by you to justify why they bought, given that they had no more information than you.
I've done nothing of the sort!!! Please go back and re-read my comments as I have done. I don't see anything there that is even mildly critical of those who have chosen to buy.
My issues are with DVC and DVC alone.
pilferk said:
That one was answered in the recent AKV floorplans thread.
OK, then move that one from the "things we can't answer" column to the "things we had to find out for ourselves" column.
Psychometrika said:
In a totally non-accusatory tone here (REALLY) ... it amazes me how people who love the "happiest places on earth" really flame out on here. I once asked a question about
MNSSHP and the park closing early ... you'd think I told their 2 year old there wasn't a Santa. Geesh. Chill guys. It IS a vacation place after all.
And in a totally non-defensive tone (NOT REALLY

), my intention isn't to keep beating this into the ground. However, when I get multiple responses to a post, some of which misinterpret my comments, I do feel it is my right to respond. I'm not trying to flame anyone...just responding to the critics.
...and finally...
Additionally, it has been clear from the beginning what would be "open" initially (prior to 2009) - the TOP TWO CONCIERGE LEVEL FLOORS.
I'm not entirely sure what you were responding to with this comment--particularly given the use of caps. I assume there's a possibility it was a response to my comment about there only being five concierge units in AKV. If so, my information is correct.
Although DVC is converting rooms that were previously part of the AKV concierge, most of those units will fall into the Value, Standard or Savannah categories. The concierge class is limited to 5 lockoff two bedroom villas, for a maximum of 10 rooms. That's a little over 1% of all AKV rooms.
Personally I think there will be a pretty ugly feeding frenzy over those rooms on a daily basis, but that's a topic for another thread.
Here's hoping that bit of info didn't catch you by surprise.
