maxiesmom
The Mean Squinty Eye Works
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2004
- Messages
- 35,688
often FA's request people to move to accommodate this
They can ask, but if they won't force someone to move who has paid for their seat assignment.
often FA's request people to move to accommodate this
They can ask, but if they won't force someone to move who has paid for their seat assignment.
and they certainly shouldn't, but they will intercede and ask for volunteers
We just flew into Orlando this afternoon and I booked an AirTran flight on Southwest website. I checked in right at 24 hours prior and thankfully we all sat together. It did worry me a lot! This was my first (and last) time flying. The whole process really messed with my anxiety.
Oh, so sorry it's your last time flying! I promise NOT all flights are like that! We've flown Airtran, Delta, and Northwest and all without major problems. Hopefully, in the near future, SW and Airtran will get it all ironed out and it'll be a great airline!
Personally? I think due to the merger, they should wave certain things (like the seating fees, luggage, etc when you book one or the other) to ensure better consumer service, loyalty, and goodwill...but now days, I guess they don't have too. But it'd be a great idea!![]()
I'm confused. So if I book an AirTran flight on SW site, there's no assigned seats. If I book a SW flight, I can buy EBCI? Is this right or do I have it backwards?
Why shouldn't they? It is quite ridiculous that they are drawing this out as long as they are. And they do not make it clear that certain Airtran policies still apply if you book through Southwest. Even my husband who has followed the merger every step of the way didn't know that the two systems were still so poorly integrated. If Airtran/Southwest is going to screw over customers they should deal with the consequences when they're called out on it. The only reason they're doing it is so they continue to nickel and dime people with more fees for booking through Airtran. They need to become one airline with one set of policy and get it over with.
They certainly 'shouldn't' force somebody to move from a seat they purchased when the playing field was level on AT and everybody had the same opportunity to purchase advance seating. Yes, even before the merger, nearly every flight we were on involving MCO on AT had this scenario.
I'm in the same boat (er plane lol) for a flight in June on AT that booked via SWA. I booked very early before their reps were even aware if you could select seats. I'd like to think they're smart enough to make it work to group parties to avoid a backlash from the public. If they can get it up and working so they can charge extra $ to book seats, i'm sure they won't let that opportunity pass. fyi, the policy is stated on the email confirmation but I admit i missed it when i made the booking.
I'm flying in a week to mexico on AT via connecting flights both ways and have had my seats assigned since the booking window opened. I have nothing but good wishes for those who booked via SWA and now need to try and find seats together such a long flight. If i had minor children and didn't want to chance being separated from them aboard a flight, i wouldn't book AT via SWA site and then assume the FA's would accommodate us by forcing somebody to give up their seat.
I doubt anyone is "forced" to do anything, I'm sure there are incentives for being nice and giving up your seat so a kid can sit next to their child. And I'll agree that pre-merger people refusing to pay an extra 6 dollars to get preassigned seats, but it is no longer that simple. Like I said in a previous post, there is a large price difference between booking through Airtran and Southwest for the same exact flight plus the different fees that Airtran also has that Southwest doesn't. There's a big difference between $18 and $300 price difference on 3 tickets. For a lot of people $300 would be the difference between going or not.
sullins5 said:Oh, so sorry it's your last time flying! I promise NOT all flights are like that! We've flown Airtran, Delta, and Northwest and all without major problems. Hopefully, in the near future, SW and Airtran will get it all ironed out and it'll be a great airline!
Personally? I think due to the merger, they should wave certain things (like the seating fees, luggage, etc when you book one or the other) to ensure better consumer service, loyalty, and goodwill...but now days, I guess they don't have too. But it'd be a great idea!![]()
I doubt anyone is "forced" to do anything, I'm sure there are incentives for being nice and giving up your seat so a kid can sit next to their child. And I'll agree that pre-merger people refusing to pay an extra 6 dollars to get preassigned seats, but it is no longer that simple. Like I said in a previous post, there is a large price difference between booking through Airtran and Southwest for the same exact flight plus the different fees that Airtran also has that Southwest doesn't. There's a big difference between $18 and $300 price difference on 3 tickets. For a lot of people $300 would be the difference between going or not.
There are no incentives given to people who move to allow a child to sit next to the parents. I know. Our last flight, a parent put her son in my husband's seat, and my husband had to sit elsewhere. So, our family was split up. Both were aisle seats, so, I didn't say anything, but, if it hadn't been an aisle seat for my husband, I would have complained. As a person who pays the $6 in advance to pick a seat, I actually wouldn't want to move to a different seat. None of us got a complimentary adult beverage. Had we complained, maybe It's not the first time that it's happened, and likely won't be the last.
There are no incentives given to people who move to allow a child to sit next to the parents. I know. Our last flight, a parent put her son in my husband's seat, and my husband had to sit elsewhere. So, our family was split up. Both were aisle seats, so, I didn't say anything, but, if it hadn't been an aisle seat for my husband, I would have complained. As a person who pays the $6 in advance to pick a seat, I actually wouldn't want to move to a different seat. None of us got a complimentary adult beverage. Had we complained, maybe It's not the first time that it's happened, and likely won't be the last.
If you didn't complain that was your own fault. If you had said your husband wanted his seat the other person would have had to move or you would have been offered something in return for moving. FAs aren't mind readers. For people that are asked to move there are incentives and I'm sure if they can't find anyone to move at first the incentives are more than a drink.
If you didn't complain that was your own fault. If you had said your husband wanted his seat the other person would have had to move or you would have been offered something in return for moving. FAs aren't mind readers. For people that are asked to move there are incentives and I'm sure if they can't find anyone to move at first the incentives are more than a drink.