Does it really affect (and who ever turned impact into a verb, anyway) anyone as severely as this poster claims? Is there any guest who intends to stay at a Magic Kingdom-area resort and JUST ride the monorail loop around Seven Seas Lagoon for six and a half hours a day, every day, their entire stay?
It would be different if one were sleeping on the monorail. Then I could see expecting a discount on the rate. But the monorail ISN'T the resort.
When my son was an infant and we took our first family vacation in 12 years, we specifically booked the Poly and paid the extra price for the
advertised convenience of using the monorail. In addition, we specifically planned on my wife and my son using it during the times currently being discussed because that is when he would take his naps, and dealing with busses and/or boats wasn't nearly as convenient for her by herself, and my daughter an I planned on staying in the parks while they slept. We also planned on going to the Magic Kingdom about 60-70% of the time we were there, because that was what the kids wanted to do at the time (Epcot is our favorite now).
I realize that you love to attempt to browbeat everyone that disagrees with your
opinion, but the fact remains that there are those who are effected negatively based on what their own personal preferences/reasons/plans/expectations, etc. and the degree to which they are negatively effected is different for everyone.
So, comparing the increased methods of transportation (boats, busses) is, to me, like comparing my sportscar to a minivan. Yes, they are both means of transportation, but not at all "apples to apples", and really, no one is suggesting that 100% of the reason, and 100% of the price they are willing to pay is due to monorail access. It's always those without a logical counter that resort to hyperbole and straw men arguments.
The
fact is that Disney charges more for those resorts in part due to the convenience of using the monorail to and from MK. This is in part why WL and FW aren't as expensive. Further, Disney knew of this in advance and from what I'm reading
still hasn't informed their guests. Of course, the reason is that they also know that it will decrease bookings for two of their most expensive resorts, and they'd rather wee-wee a few people off than do that. They likely already have spoken with various CMs in management on what to offer disgruntled guests, and whatever it is the bean counters have already determined it will cost Disney less than actually informing said guests in enough time for them to modify their housing arrangements if they so chose.
It's your opinion that it isn't a big deal. Great, for you it isn't. For me, it would have completely changed almost every planned aspect of our vacation, and it
would have been a big deal. You're entitled to your opinion, but your opinion doesn't pay for
my vacation.
I'm sure if Mickey clubbed a baby seal on national TV there would be a significant number of you folks that would attempt to stifle any opinion that it was anything less than super-cala-fraga-listic-expi-ala-do-cious. The rest of us would have a different opinion.