Well, I'm sure I'm one of the people you guys (Jessica and Michele) would get annoyed with because I feel a certain way about the Casey Anthony verdict. It doesn't rule my life, though - I've gone on with my day and done other things that had nothing to do with that! Life goes on!
But, as with so many things, the outcome was largely based on opinion. The opionion of 12 people. A different group of 12 people may have felt completely differently. I watched the whole trial and I felt the prosecution
did prove their case, in my opinion - quite well, in fact.
This particular group of 12 people did not feel that way - or...maybe they just wanted to go home. You never know what people are really thinking while they use the "reasonable doubt" excuse.
Other defendants have been convicted on much
less evidence, while still other defendants have been acquitted when there were
mountains of evidence. Much of it boils down to that particular group of people in any given jury, how well they understand and process the information, how intelligent they are or are not, how logically they can think, what extenuating circumstances they have going on in their lives, etc., as well as the obvious factors such as how well the attorneys did in court. Sometimes jurors acquit or convict people for the 'wrong' reasons - it happens a lot, I would bet. We would all hope they do the right things, but people are people and they don't always do that. But the fact is, we will usually never learn what was really going on in the minds of most jurors in most trials so it is forever left a mystery and assumed to be based on following the letter of the law.
As for why some trials or situations catch fire in the media and others don't when there are so many crimes committed - who knows? They just do. It just happens.
And I will leave it at that.