Which means NOTHING in to current case. Now if you came up with more then one other story, maybe it would mean something. NO hospital is immune to complications after surgery or even malpractice. Why? Because it is staffed by human beings. Not robots with perfect programing.
And yes, the family has lied. The "routine" procedure when it was anything but for example. Why don't they actually tell the truth about the type of procedure done? Why don't they allow the hospital to defend itself? These are questions that can, and should, be raised. It is not "vilifying" them to ask questions about things that do not make sense.
And about the Texas case... it bothers me a lot as well. She is dead. We shouldn't, as human beings, be keeping someone from death. It boggles my mind. I do not think it is ethical in any way, shape, or form. However, Texas law requires it due to the unborn fetus. So, the state gets to play around and do what I think is not right.
There is, in this case, NO reason at all for the child to be kept on any sort of machines. I won't even call it "life support" because there is no life TO support.