To me it is not about we odn't have it so why should you mentality. To me it is about treating all fairly. We have examples on this trhead which you have blatantly ignored of how the union's healthcare policies have completely screwed the non union employees of the same company. I would love for everyone to have free health care (minus copays) but that simply isn't realisitc in today's economy.
The long and the short of it is that we are in a recession. That free health care is going to cost the company a lot in the coming years as their profit base dwindles. They can either help to offset those costs by asking you to start paying premiums now, they can further make health care unaffordable for those who are not union, they can pass on the added cost to customers who are already hurting and risk losing more customers as they seek cheaper service elsewhere, or they can start laying off people when they begin to lose money.
I would much rather the company take a proactive step now than result to more drastic measures. The health care you enjoy is coming at the expense of other employees and that is flat out wrong. The health care you enjoy has the potential to put your company in dire financial straits. Wouldn't you rather have a job where you have to pay premiums (like most of the world) or not have a job at all and therefore have no healthcare. A company does not continue to exist if they do not change with the times. Just because they made a profit last year does not mean they can go on their merry way and think the recession won't affect them.
You make some very great points. It is unfair that some management employees pay so much for their benefits but you can bet they are fighting for us to keep our level of benefits or else the company will ask them to dig even deeper.
Factually it is proven that public utilities do better in a recession than in a good economy. People stay home using more phone, tv and electricity instead of vacationing and going out to dinner.
Public Utilities were in trouble when everyone wss making money in the dot com era. Thats why we now only have 3 major telephone companies now because the smaller ones got gobbled up because they weren't doing well. Verizon , SBC now AT&T , and Qwest are really the 3 major players.
I think that this company is cetainly not in financial trouble and I believe that although healthcare costs have sky rocketed the amount of employees being covered has diminished due to people being laid off, retirees dying, people quiting or being fired and the fact that there has been a hiring freeze. They only have been hiring Prem Techs to install there new Uverse Tv product by the way has over 1,000,000 customers. The average customer has 3 set top boxes at a rental fee of 7 dollars a month. That is 21,000,000 dollars in set top box rental a month. Boxes just sitting on top of a customers TV.263,000,000 dollars a year.
If AT&T would support healthcare reform maybe this problem could be resolved. Why if healthcare is such a burden on AT&T why are they not supporting this legislation. Lastly they say the cable companies can under cut their pricing because Comcast, Charter, Cablevision use non-union employees. Why isn't AT&T supporting the Free Choice Act where it makes it easier for workers to organize their workplace. If the cable companies became unionized AT&T wouldn't have to slash their prices to be competitive.
Makes me wonder what the real issues of not giving the union workers healthcare is.
It certainly isn't about the money.