no no no -it is all about meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!
![]()





to her DH for a while, so it is all about me
)
Of course, he would have his ear buds
There was an off-topic post up above somewhere - sorry I have to go back to work tomorrow (finally) so I can't really pay attention...
Phew, safe again 
Perhaps he isn't ready for this kind of meal yet
I have to say this and I do not mean it as a personal attack. I agree with PP, an 11 year old boy should be able to sit and enjoy a dinner out. He will not be able to bring a DS everywhere he goes for his whole life, he will have to learn how to sit and have a conversation. Why not teach this to him now. It drives me crazy to see older children with video games, earphones and Ipods in dining establishments. Put the device down and learn how to socially interact!
That said I don't really see the trouble with younger children (under 8) having a distraction, sitting that long can be tiresome at that age and be over the abilities of some children (though I have to say I have regularly dined out with children 4 and older and they have all made hour plus meals with no distractions other then crayons and conversation)


If its not disruptive to other diners I say it doesn't matter what someone is doing at their own table during their dining experience. You are footing your bill not your "annoyed" neighbour![]()
) No, seriously - the tables at California grill are a bit further apart, which is one of the things I like about it. I don't think I would notice your child sitting quietly (or even fidgeting a bit) playing his DS at that restaurant. I'd be WAY too busy enjoying the sunset, my wine, delicious food and attentive service!A child playing Nintendo at their table wouldn't annoy me in the least. It's Disney for the love of Pete, people.