The thing that makes M:S different than other rides isn't the g's experienced. Its been noted before that there are other rides that pull more g's.
The difference is in the length of time, and the visual stimuli. As Disney has told us, there is no other ride like it.
Most of the posts in support of M:S are based on one's own personal tolerance for risk. Of course that's a perfectly acceptable basis to use when making decisions for yourself and your family.
But again, that's largely irrelevant for Disney. It doesn't take a large portion of their audience to be upset about something for it to impact them negatively. Think about how much we discuss the merits of a 5% increase or decrease in attendance, for example.
Further, most of you are right, incidents like this are sensationalized in the media. Look at all the fear there is out there about random child abduction and serial killers. Yet the odds of these things actually happening to anyone are miniscule. True, most people do not live in fear over these things, but most do take basic precautions, as they should. And when one of these things happen, there are always calls for changes to laws, sentencing, etc. Many people are afraid to fly out of fears of a crash, yet statistically its much safer than any other mode of transporatation.
Same principle applies here. 2 deaths in a year still make the ride much safer than driving your car or going swimming. But guess what? That's irrelevant to Disney. They must consider the "hype" and the "overreaction" and deal with it.
The question is, where in the spectrum between Tower of Terror and Base Jump off Tower of Terror does M:S lie? Does anyone really know enough about the risks involved to know?
And that's what bothers me most. No, based on the odds, I am not afraid to ride this thing. But as AV pointed out, me thinking it won't happen to me is hardly justification for ignoring what is happening to others.
Based on the data we have, it looks like M:S is a higher risk attraction than anything else Disney has built. But I'm not a fool. I know the data does not 100% support any specific risk factor being assigned. Its just that the data combined with the fact that this is a different type of ride has to raise red flags when you look at this logically. No, again, not from a personal risk perspective, but from what Disney can handle as a business that relies on providing a fantastical family atmosphere unlike what's found anywhere else, including other theme/amusement parks.
I also want to add that I don't want to sound cold about all of this. I'm focusing on the business side and the big picture and not the moral issues becuase the moral issues are more personal in nature and its unlikely anyone will change their position on that anyway. But I will say that while I personally am accepting of the risk level, I'm not ok with Disney (or anyone) who operates a ride knowing the risk of death correlates to the data we have on M:S, about 1 per year.
This is not like getting on a motorcycle and experiencing something you've done many times before. Physical thrill rides and this one in particular subject our bodies to things we simply do not experience with any kind of regularity anywhere else, unless we are an astronaut, professional race car driver, etc.
I personally feel that if the current rate of deaths occuring on M:S is statistically representative of the risks, then its not acceptable. But again, that is my personal opinion, and I am not basing my opinions on what Disney should do on that.