They're the ones that got the national attention, but I wouldn't call them representative of anything. I know a fair number of people who took part in the protests (but didn't get their pictures in the news because they followed the organizers' plan of "stay in your car, maintain safe distance") and none fit that description. They're just small town small business owners and employees who object to their livelihoods being erased for dubious benefit. And if you ask them, the protest was successful - the governor relaxed the parts of the order they had the biggest problems with. Because they weren't protesting *all* social distancing, just asking for small businesses to get the same options being offered to bigger businesses and for lower-risk activities like lawn care to be allowed to continue.
The revised order has been cause for a LOT of celebration in my circles. The one and only thing I've heard ongoing complaints about is the fact that non-essential medical is still mostly closed. I really hope that changes soon because our medical systems are sinking and a lot of people are going without care that might not be essential to keep them alive this month or this year but the lack of which is definitely creating bigger problems and longer-term risks.
I've been thinking about that a lot since this thing started. About all of the misinformation and fear of the early years of the AIDS epidemic, people being afraid of catching it from a public restroom or thinking their kids weren't safe in a classroom with an HIV positive child. I think social media has taken all of the fear that comes from the early uncertainty about a new disease and made it a million times worse.
I'm not sure where that flyer is from, but the date is wrong for the Michigan protests. They were the 15th.
Most of the participants in the protest did social distance. They called it "operation gridlock" for a reason - they were never meant to get out of the car. I know some heavily armed blowhards did, but they weren't at all representative of the participants as a whole.
And both the local police/fire departments and the hospital made statements that the protest in no way interfered with normal operations. So maybe you ought to take your own advice and diversify your reading, because the whole "they interfered with a hospital" was a social media invention. And I've been really disappointed by some of the people spreading it, because many of us took part in another major protest/rally a couple Januarys ago that blocked that same road... and caught flack from people opposed to our "cause" because of it. So at least some of the people I saw spreading that line absolutely should have known better but shared it anyway.