Why mess wih a classic???

donaldduck352

<font color=red><marquee>Proud Redhead</marquee><b
Joined
Mar 16, 2008
Messages
8,475
Watching A Christmas Carol,the new one with Jim Carrey.Great special effects and such,but c'mon!!

I love the orginal that came out in 1950 with Alastair Sim.The last version with Bill Murrey Scrooged was funny.But why do they think another remake will make it better???:confused3
 
My favorite version is Mickey's Christmas Carol, if no remakes were ever made, then MY classic/favorite version wouldn't exist.
 
Classic movie, I agree, but the Alastair Sim version isn't the original either. There is a 1938 version with Reginald Owen.

Sim was a great Scrooge.

I haven't seen the Jim Carrey movie.
 
I hear ya! I'm more of a purist too but the old stuff just doesn't hold my kids interest. I keep trying to expose them to what I think of as greatness and I have a 50/50 shot of them liking it:confused3
 

We just watched the Jim Carrey version & I could see that so many of the special effects were for 3D. And we weren't watching it in 3D.

eh - I'll take any version of this story. It's fun to see it from different perspectives.
 
Good luck finding a kid who would be interested in watching the Alistair Sim version of CC. They remade it because the technology exists to make a fascinating mo-cap animated version. I found it to be a neat movie.

Now why they needed to remake True Grit? Who the heck knows.
 
My dd and I watched it last night. How funny!

I thought it was eh...but my 14yodd being someone who rarely watches "books" to movies due to being a literary snob stated that it was not a bad adaption for the book, except for the last ghost.

Anyway, "A Christmas Carol" is something that is remade ten ways till Sunday. If you include cartoons, it has probably been remade many times.;)

My favorite is the 1984 George C Scott version personally.:thumbsup2
 
Watching A Christmas Carol,the new one with Jim Carrey.Great special effects and such,but c'mon!!

I love the orginal that came out in 1950 with Alastair Sim.The last version with Bill Murrey Scrooged was funny.But why do they think another remake will make it better???:confused3

That's not the original so I guess it's good that they decided to release a remake in 1951.
 
Classic movie, I agree, but the Alastair Sim version isn't the original either. There is a 1938 version with Reginald Owen.

Sim was a great Scrooge.

I haven't seen the Jim Carrey movie.


I looked it up on the Wiki and technically the 1938 film is the 8th version.:lmao:
 
I love the Muppet Christmas Carol with Michael Caine. It is perfect in my opinion and I think that Dickens would have really enjoyed this version. It is a classic at our house. :goodvibes
 
I might have to rent the Muppet Movie, that looks cute.

You should; it IS good:goodvibes

I am another who likes to see various takes on a story like this (and as pointed out, OP's "classic" is far from the original as well;)). They are remade because the stories themselves are classic and timeless.

The same thing happens in music all of the time. Sometimes I think the original is the best. Sometimes a remake takes a blah song and makes it into something really good (like the Bow Wow Wow version of I Want Candy from the 80s--which i like so much better than the original from the 50s) and sometimes they are both really good in their own rights and I have no favourite (like both Bobby Day's and then Jackson 5's Rockin' Robin, to me anyway).
You are always free to not watch (or listen to) the ones you don't care for--and you might get something you like a whole lot better when the new stuff comes out.
 
Normally, I'd agree with the OP. Some movies are so good there should never be a remake. However, A Christmas Carol has been done and redone so many times, it doesn't bother me. I like many versions. The TBS version with Patrick Stewart is my personal favorite but I love the Muppet version, too. Both excellent!

I'm not a big Jim Carrey fan and his remake of the Grinch is just horrible, IMO. That's one that shouldn't be touched. I'm pretty sure I wouldn't like this new version of Dicken's tale, but I might give it a try. :confused3 We'll see.
 
Stories are remade, reimagined, and rebooted because that's what people want. Familiar stories strike at something that many people find comforting.

Indeed, even when a story is ostensibly wholly-original people still seek parallels between that story and other stories, "standard motifs", etc. Often, when faced with a truly original story, some people react negatively, because there is nothing familiar for them to latch onto. A significant number of people have a seemingly programmed antipathy toward the new and different.

The most "legitimate" form of entertainment is, essentially, the presentation of a remake, night after night. While efforts are taken to keep it consistent with the "original", changes are made over time ("workshopped" even, sometimes), and actually, in the absence of changes, it is just the ultimate form of copying before resorting to recording.

Labeling something "classic" is really just a conceit, asserting that we, sitting in our own time, can make a pronouncement for all time. While there clearly can be "old stuff" that people continue to enjoy into the current-day, as well as an appreciation for something that is old simply because it provides a touchstone for a previous time, it's not necessarily universal, nor is there any reason to believe that that status conferred is due to anything other than good fortune for the old work.

There is also a danger in considering specific presentations as classics and disparaging remakes as a result: It denies the talent of-the-day the opportunity to have the open mind of their audience.


And beyond all that, the original A Christmas Carol was produced in 1908, with remakes in 1914 and 1938 (as well as others), before the 1951 remake that the OP asserted was "the" classic. I haven't seen these earlier versions, but there is no reason to believe that they were put aside for any other reason than technology had advanced (i.e., even the 1938 version was in black and white). The latest version takes advantage of the superior video and sound technology that we have available today, just as the 1951 remake took advantage of the superior video and sound technology that they had in that time.
 
If I want "serious Scrooge" I'll watch George C. Scott and if I want "fun Scrooge" I'm watching the Muppets!
 
We always try to watch Mickey's Christmas Carol and the Muppet version every year for our fun Scrooge fix.

For serious Scrooge, the Patrick Stewart version is our absolute favorite. :)
 
Christmas Carol seems to be one of those story lines that will continue to repeat itself in movies and TV shows.
Same with Romeo and Juliet & Cinderella.
Don't know why but the people swapping one (i.e. Freaky Friday) seems to continue to repeat itself over and over.
Personally, my favorite version is Scrooged with Bill Murray :)
 
I love the Muppet Christmas Carol with Michael Caine. It is perfect in my opinion and I think that Dickens would have really enjoyed this version. It is a classic at our house. :goodvibes

...when I think of the Muppets and Christmas, I think:

Emmet-Otters-Jug-Band-Christmas.jpg
kermit1.jpg
9102636310708544.jpg
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer

New Posts







DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom