Crankyshank
<font color=CC0066>love the happy bunny<br> <fon
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2002
- Messages
- 10,399
Why can't God be a woman? How is that blasphemy?
Why can't God be a woman? How is that blasphemy?For the best evidence of what Jesus would agree with (that we can understand), check out how He responded to those that acted like you do. Hint: Do you think his message was that the first century Palestine authorities were going too easy on sexual licentiousness, or that they were judging too harshly, misusing temporal authority? Now of course that raises a whole host of related theological issues, that of a Christian Community like Paul addressed. But even his letters were addressed to the separateness of the Christian Community, not to the bringing of the Kingdom through temporal power (now we're cooking), which is what He mainly railed against, and what ya'll usually attack us on, validly, I might add, though via an anachronistic caricaturehokiefan33 said:We speak for Jesus anytime we tell others about Him, anytime we teach in Sunday School or talk in church, or anytime we quote the Bible to someone. Would Jesus agree with what sodaseller is shoveling? I say, 100%, unequivocally, absolutely NOT. We can never know everything about Jesus, or His nature. But we can know what He wants for us, what He wants us to believe about Him, and about aspects of Christianity, by reading the Bible. And if people say things contrary to what the Bible teaches, then I can absolutely say that Jesus wouldn't agree.
Exactly!kidshop said:Um, I don't think God is either. He is God not human. Jesus became a man on earth, but that's really all we know.
kidshop said:Um, I don't think God is either. He is God not human. Jesus became a man on earth, but that's really all we know.

Incorrect. To be sure, the noun used in the OT is actually not gender specific, and can be used to refer to male OR female, but not just male.BelleMcNally said:I, for one, do. And as a Hebrew scholar I should tell you that, all through Genesis, a feminine form of the noun is used to describe the Creator.
Wow. Have you ever even read a Bible?Crankyshank said:Why can't God be a woman? How is that blasphemy?
hokiefan33 said:Clearly, Aidensmom, this does not mean that. And you know it. Of course, I'm sure you agree with most of what is being said, anyway.
Dead on - better than I statedBelleMcNally said:There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
I think it was a very pretty way of saying that claiming to fully comprehend the Divine as possessing NO contradictions does a disservice to religion. That the true burden and beauty of spirituality comes when people accept the charge to be completely merciful, even as they are completely faith-filled, even if they can't totally wrap their minds around how it's possible to do both.
And that SCRIPTURE (or rather, your interpretation of certain parts of the Christian scripture) isn't meant to be used like mathematics equation...
sodaseller, feel free to chime in if I'm wrong.
hokiefan33 said:Incorrect. To be sure, the noun used in the OT is actually not gender specific, and can be used to refer to male OR female, but not just male.
So, why throughout the NT (and in the OT as well, for that matter) is God referred to as the Father, or Him? I know the nouns used in the NT are male-specific? Did He change from neutral to male???
Please.
hokiefan33 said:Incorrect. To be sure, the noun used in the OT is actually not gender specific, and can be used to refer to male OR female, but not just male.
So, why throughout the NT (and in the OT as well, for that matter) is God referred to as the Father, or Him? I know the nouns used in the NT are male-specific? Did He change from neutral to male???
Please.
Bob Slydell said:Wouldn't have anything to do with the fact that all the authors of the Bible were male, would it?
Are you arguing that God was human?
hokiefan33 said:Wow. Have you ever even read a Bible?
Has nothing at all to do with that. Remember, the Bible was divinely inspired by God, according to the book of 1 Timothy (unless you've removed that book from your Bible, of course)Bob Slydell said:Wouldn't have anything to do with the fact that all the authors of the Bible were male, would it?
Are you arguing that God was human?
hokiefan33 said:Incorrect. To be sure, the noun used in the OT is actually not gender specific, and can be used to refer to male OR female, but not just male.
So, why throughout the NT (and in the OT as well, for that matter) is God referred to as the Father, or Him? I know the nouns used in the NT are male-specific? Did He change from neutral to male???
Please.
cats7494 said:Interesting argument, isn't it Bob?
Crankyshank said:I believe God, as an entity and not a human, has both male and female aspects.
Wow. OK, on that note, we have clearly reached the irrational, ridiculous stage of this debate, and I am out. Further arguing is pointless. It really is too bad that more Christians aren't decrying this line of thinking, though.Crankyshank said:Yes I have. Have you?
God is not human. How can something that is not human be assigned a sex? And if they are assigned a sex, why can't it be female? Because a misogynist says so? Still not understanding how assigning God a female gender is blasphemy.
I believe God, as an entity and not a human, has both male and female aspects.