eliza61
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2003
- Messages
- 21,023
Lewisc said:A sharing charge is reasonable, particularly if you split the entree in the kitchen. Even Shula's only charges $10 for sharing. For a $15 sharing charge I'd expect the dinner split in the kitchen, an extra salad and probably extra potato and vegetable.
Disney2d2--Most of a restaurants expenses aren't the cost of the food. The sharing charge is to cover your share of the cost of running the restaurant. If every party of two ordered one meal the restaurant would have to almost double their prices. It makes sense, and it's fair, for the restaurant to operate that way. It certainly makes sense for you to skip restaurants that have policies you aren't happy with.
Exactly. We are very polite and always explain our policies. Believe it or not we rarely get anyone who disagree with it and our portions generally are huge (we call our take out bags- elephant bags instead of doggie bags). I find that most people want the same thing. Good food for a good value and that's what we consistenly give them (Over 40 years, same NYC location. Which in a city of restaurants is saying some thing). I remember when we instituted the no-cell phone rule during dinner, every one thought it would be a huge blow out but you know what nothing happened. We gently ask people to turn their cell phones off or put them on vibrate so as not to disturb other diners, now every one is doing it. Same thing with sharing entrees, over time it raises the cost of all the meals if it were wide spread. We truly don't have many complaints. As to the other poster, we like to think all our guest have functioning brains.