You gotta do, what ya gotta do. And I agree with all you stated. I really truly believe that it all boils down to your expectations....and it should. If you're fine soaking up the atmosphere and riding a few rides great. But if you expect to be able to ride your favorites a lot and not rope drop and not stand in long lines, ya better wait. That doesn't mean one way is right and one is wrong.....folks just have different opinions.
It really is that simple, isn't it?
It really is that simple. I think this is where half of the ******* between FP+ enthusiasts and FP+ skeptics came from.
To a certain extent, they just wanted different things, they had different expectations and levels of tolerance for value for money.
For many of the FP+ supporters, they would say things like: its going to be great to get my FP+ reservations in the afternoon without having to go to the park in the morning. And they were genuinely happy about this ... cool.
Other people would argue that this wont impede their touring style, they would still get to ride like crazy at Rope drop, and then use their FPs when crowds were heavier ... or as a lot of people noted when they went at low crowds there would be little difference. Ok Fair.
FP+ Skeptics would point out that they are going to be absolutely limited to 3FPs a day, and that is just not enough for them. And they are genuinely unhappy about this ...
They would point out that even at Rope drop FPs are useful, and that they could get in MORE rides at RD with FP- and still pull FPs for the afternoon with FP- ... also fair ... but these people are probably also talking about touring in mid to low season as well, where you CAN pull FP- for headliners throughout the day. So its pretty easy to see why someone touring in peak season might not agree with this....
I think perhaps the BEST example of this was the person who, for a time, was advocating FP+ because, while they recognized this would limit the number of rides they would ride, they said they were looking forward to standing in lines with their family for ... literally ... a couple hours at a time, because it would be great to "spend time with their family" ... to which I jokingly (but seriously) offered to rent out my house for $2000/week, they wouldn't have to ride ANY rides and could just "spend time with their family" all day every day
But really, that's what this person wants to do for a couple grand a week, great, some people are honestly ok with whatever the do at Disney, so long as they are at Disney, and nothing is going to make them think differently. Many of us aren't ok with that, we want to ride rides, that's totally ok too, and there are some people who have pointed out how FP+ will actually allow them to ride more, because of their touring style. (this then gets people all riled up about the "fairness" of RD vs FP+ prebooking and whether RD with unlimited FP is better than non-RD but with guaranteed FPs) all of this is perfectly ok.
For the record I think the other half of the division is in the IMPACT and final product of FP+ vs FP- ... this complicates things. Those who point to RD get countered by those who worry that FP+ will diminish the RD advantage, or those who talk about how great it will be to book their afternoon FP+ get countered by those who argue afternoon/evening FPs will be gone, potentially, at Day 60 .... I am sure there are some in these debates who are negative about any type of change, the known is better than the unknown, but there are just as many (perhaps more, since this is after all a Disney fan site) people who just refuse to admit that anything Disney does might turn out poorly...
And then there are people in both camps who argue, even if this will be ok or not .... DISNEY NEEDS TO BUILD MORE .... and this probably would have improved the guest experience much more than spending all this $$$ on FP+ ...