Originally posted by Toby'sFriend
I have read several articles over the years concerning the relationship of Mary Magdelene and Jesus, so the revelation of that supposed fact wasn't earth shattering to me. I have never read anything that proves it to me one way or the other. As far as a lineage, I think that is really pushing the matter.
You really have to keep in mind that the book is fiction and that several key facts have been altered to fit the story.
I did pick up a book in the library last night - Breaking the Da Vinci Code. It should be interesting to read.
Originally posted by KarenC
Oh my goodness...I agree with Dmadman43!Reading the book reinforced my beliefs.
I am a former Catholic and I have a real problem with the "man-made" aspects of the Catholic faith. Particularly the requirement that priests be men and also be celebate. Women were active disciples of Christ in the early church and it was several hundred years before priests had to be celebate--due to church concerns over priests heirs claiming church property.
We had a speaker at our church talk about what there is historic
basis for in the book and what he believes is fiction. While this speaker did not believe Jesus and Mary Magdalene were married, he thinks that there is ample evidence that she was his closest disciple (the beloved disciple in the book of John) and that she was his "companion". It was a very interesting talk and was well attended.
Originally posted by zagafi
I'd read about those theories before, so none of it was new to me. If Jesus had married and fathered children, it wouldn't change what I believe one bit.
What I do not understand is people refusing to acknowledge the Bible's contents being decided upon by *men*.

Originally posted by DoeWDW
It didn't upset me, but it did make me think through my beliefs, which I think is a good thing.
I can understand, though, how it could truly upset people. There are some very controversial ideas in it. Maybe I would have been more upset if I were a member of the Catholic church.