What would Dissers do - Teens & drugs

...The new research is all contrary to what you say your friends were told, but I hope for their sake all of the scientific evidence is incorrect. Unfortunately, I don't think it is...

Tiger

LOL - "What I say my friends were told" - You crack me up. Passive/aggressive much? :lmao:

As for the rest, you asked for reasoning. I offered it. It isn't good enough for you. You don't want to accept that reasonable people might feel differently about this than you. :confused3
 
LOL - "What I say my friends were told" - You crack me up. Passive/aggressive much? :lmao:

As for the rest, you asked for reasoning. I offered it. It isn't good enough for you. You don't want to accept that reasonable people might feel differently about this than you. :confused3

I have no idea what you are talking about with your reasonable people comment. I'm not a psychiatrist, nor a scientist...I am just reporting what I have read, and have been taught at workshops. I provided tons of links for you to check it out yourself too.

I'm not being passive aggressive - I'm not sure how many years ago that was, but the newest research in multiple countries, is showing the exact opposite of what you have reported about your friends. Perhaps that's what the doctors thought at that time, but that is not what is being reported now.

I truly hope your friends are ok - I deal with many bipolar students, and it's a hard life...

Tiger
 
...they don't hear what the rest of us hear. I'm not sure how many years ago that was, ...

One was some time ago (maybe 15 years) - I was the best man in his wedding. He stopped smoking pot immediately and has not had anything remotely close to another episode.

The other is the son of my wife's best friend, less than 18 months ago. I have known him since the day he was born. The information was shared directly with his mother while he was still in lock-down, who discussed it with us. So it was not a matter of a pot smoker hearing what he wanted to hear. His mother wanted the doctor to say, "No more pot smoking or this will happen again", but he said that just wasn't true. Sadly, I think that is the reason that he is smoking pot again. He isn't afraid of a recurrence. So far, so good - but he is only smoking once or twice per week (according to his mother).

But none of this changes the fact that millions upon millions of people smoke pot regularly with no ill effects. None.
 
One was some time ago (maybe 15 years) - I was the best man in his wedding. He stopped smoking pot immediately and has not had anything remotely close to another episode.

The other is the son of my wife's best friend, less than 18 months ago. I have known him since the day he was born. The information was shared directly with his mother while he was still in lock-down, who discussed it with us. So it was not a matter of a pot smoker hearing what he wanted to hear. His mother wanted the doctor to say, "No more pot smoking or this will happen again", but he said that just wasn't true. Sadly, I think that is the reason that he is smoking pot again. He isn't afraid of a recurrence. So far, so good - but he is only smoking once or twice per week (according to his mother).

But none of this changes the fact that millions upon millions of people smoke pot regularly with no ill effects. None.

I'm glad your other friend has not had a reoccurence - I'm sure the first time was scary enough.

I hope your second friend is ok. Maybe he'll defy the scientific studies at this point, and not have any ill effects. Regardless of what we believe, he is living it, and I truly hope he never has another psychotic episode.

Of course millions of people smoke up without any ill effects - millions also drink and drive without killing someone, and millions more smoke their entire lives without getting cancer...those are still not compelling reasons why someone should partake in those activities, IMHO.

Tiger
 

I agree that nothing is safe when used in an extreme manner. So, do you let your kids smoke, but only a certain amount? Again, I'm not sure how they would take you seriously at that point, I know I wouldn't.

Tiger
I can tell this is an issue which is really close to you:hug: It must be rough watching your students struggle with so many issues day after day.

I am not seeing that Disneybama (or anyone else for that matter) is saying they are "letting" their kids smoke pot--only that they would not consider it as big of a deal as many other things a teen could do wrong.

Anyway, no I am not okay with any smoking of cigarettes because they are so highly addictive and all cigarette smoke has a carcinogenic effect. However, there are plenty of other things that I am okay with my kids using in safe ways but not in an extreme manner. For example, I teach my children that a glass or two of alcohol over the course of an evening is safe and perfectly okay--but that drinking to the point of being sick, blacking out, making bad choices that one would not make sober, etc is not okay (and is in fact very bad for one's health). Another example is as simple as soda: I teach my kids that a glass of soda a few times a week is fine, but drinking a 2 liter bottle a day is terrible for one's health (diabetes, obesity and tooth decay being the big issues there).
With most EVERYTHING in life moderation and balance is important--I think denying that would cause MY children to not take me seriously.

Nope, none of it is fine with me, regardless of the law. Heck, I don't like it when kids drink coffee - LOL! But, when you are talking about legal and illegal substances, you can't regulate how people use legal substances. Pot is illegal, but cigarettes are not. As I said, in my country it's not illegal for teens to smoke, just to purchase the cigarettes. As far as alcohol, it is illegal for kids to purchase alcohol under age 19, but the product itself is legal, so if a parent gives it to their child in their own home, there is not much you can do.

There is no confusion in my household or in my classroom - illegal drugs are not good for the body/brain, and some legal ones aren't either, but we can't regulate how people use legal drugs, and that is why I have made the distinction in this discussion. It is not ok to break the law, but pot is illegal all around, whereas alcohol and cigarettes have age stipulations for purchase.

Not meant to confuse at all...some pro-pot posters on here seem to forget that pot is illegal, and that is why I made the distinction. It is illegal to sell, possess or use, period. Whereas the other legal drugs, if you will, such as cigarettes or alcohol have age limits attached for possession or purchase. I don't condone smoking or drinking under age, but again, I can't stop a parent if they give it to their kids in their home, and it is actually not illegal for them to do so. In our province, you can actually serve alcohol in a bar/restaurant at age 18 - so again, you have to be 19 to purchase, but you can be under that age to serve someoen else. Talk about confusing... We have had to call the police or CAS on parents who have sold drugs to their teens as the act of possession is illegal (although in my province, you are allowed to possess a minute amount without penalty).

Oh, and I ABSOLUTELY get to regulate how people living in my home use legal drugs. I even regulate visitors to an extent (ie--smoking is not allowed on my property at all; I don't care who you are and how legal it is you can go elsewhere to do it). I certainly regulate many legal things which involve my kids and their health and well being. I think it would be very foolish of a parent not to.
Sorry for the confusion, Tiger
Well, thanks for trying to answer but I am still confused. I must not be expressing myself well.
I agree that I do not want my child addicted to any drug (legal or not) or abusing them in any way (using to the point of being sick, unable to make good decisions, etc even once).
However, you seem to go back and forth with WHY you are so heavily opposed to marijuana. For several posts your emphasis was on it is illegal (and for some reason you seem to have a bigger issue with illegal use of a substance which is never legal than illegal use of an age controlled substance--unless I am misinterpreting things :confused3). At other times, your concern seem to be the dangers of the drug (specifically as it relates to HEAVY users who are predisposed to bi-polar or schizophrenia).
So I guess I am curious what is your overriding concern and why?


Of course millions of people smoke up without any ill effects - millions also drink and drive without killing someone, and millions more smoke their entire lives without getting cancer...those are still not compelling reasons why someone should partake in those activities, IMHO.

Tiger
It seem to me like that is comparing apples to oranges. It should be more like this:
the vast majority of people who drink a few (1-3) drinks 2-3 times a week over a course of an evening have no ill effects from this. The same is likely true for the vast majority of people who smoke a few (1-3 also?) joints 2-3 times over the course of an evening.

People who are predisposed to alcoholism (family history) or depression are much more likely to become alcoholics if they ever start drinking and need to be hyper aware of the possibility of over use OR abstain all together. Likewise, people with a predisposition to bi-polar or schizophrenia are more likely to have issues if they become heavy used of pot and should there fore also watch carefully or abstain altogether. Many predisposed people (in either case) may not know they carry this genetic marker--thus everyone should be careful not to overuse and to seek treatment immediately if they find they are feeling compelled to do so.

While quite a lot of people do drink and drive without ill effect MANY times such behaviour results in deadly consequences (often to innocent bystanders) and thus this action should never happen--the same is true for driving high.

In other words--comparing MODERATE use of one substance to MODERATE use of the other makes some sense, but comparing moderate use of one to heavy use of the other is just silly (since both have similar effects at moderate versus high levels).
 
So, is it that you wonder why people smoke pot?

Nope, I don't wonder at all. People love to self-medicate for various reasons. I don't, and never have, but I am not stupid, naive or arrogant enough to believe that others won't either. People love to feel better in many ways, unfortunately, our society loves to do it with substances, whether they are legal or not. It's not for me, and I wish it wasn't for my students either, but it is what it is...I can't stop it, but I do fight with it each and everyday at school by educating and listening to what my students have to say.

I can tell this is an issue which is really close to you:hug: It must be rough watching your students struggle with so many issues day after day.

I am not seeing that Disneybama (or anyone else for that matter) is saying they are "letting" their kids smoke pot--only that they would not consider it as big of a deal as many other things a teen could do wrong.

Anyway, no I am not okay with any smoking of cigarettes because they are so highly addictive and all cigarette smoke has a carcinogenic effect. However, there are plenty of other things that I am okay with my kids using in safe ways but not in an extreme manner. For example, I teach my children that a glass or two of alcohol over the course of an evening is safe and perfectly okay--but that drinking to the point of being sick, blacking out, making bad choices that one would not make sober, etc is not okay (and is in fact very bad for one's health). Another example is as simple as soda: I teach my kids that a glass of soda a few times a week is fine, but drinking a 2 liter bottle a day is terrible for one's health (diabetes, obesity and tooth decay being the big issues there).
With most EVERYTHING in life moderation and balance is important--I think denying that would cause MY children to not take me seriously.


Well, thanks for trying to answer but I am still confused. I must not be expressing myself well.
I agree that I do not want my child addicted to any drug (legal or not) or abusing them in any way (using to the point of being sick, unable to make good decisions, etc even once).
However, you seem to go back and forth with WHY you are so heavily opposed to marijuana. For several posts your emphasis was on it is illegal (and for some reason you seem to have a bigger issue with illegal use of a substance which is never legal than illegal use of an age controlled substance--unless I am misinterpreting things :confused3). At other times, your concern seem to be the dangers of the drug (specifically as it relates to HEAVY users who are predisposed to bi-polar or schizophrenia).
So I guess I am curious what is your overriding concern and why?



It seem to me like that is comparing apples to oranges. It should be more like this:
the vast majority of people who drink a few (1-3) drinks 2-3 times a week over a course of an evening have no ill effects from this. The same is likely true for the vast majority of people who smoke a few (1-3 also?) joints 2-3 times over the course of an evening.

People who are predisposed to alcoholism (family history) or depression are much more likely to become alcoholics if they ever start drinking and need to be hyper aware of the possibility of over use OR abstain all together. Likewise, people with a predisposition to bi-polar or schizophrenia are more likely to have issues if they become heavy used of pot and should there fore also watch carefully or abstain altogether. Many predisposed people (in either case) may not know they carry this genetic marker--thus everyone should be careful not to overuse and to seek treatment immediately if they find they are feeling compelled to do so.

While quite a lot of people do drink and drive without ill effect MANY times such behaviour results in deadly consequences (often to innocent bystanders) and thus this action should never happen--the same is true for driving high.

In other words--comparing MODERATE use of one substance to MODERATE use of the other makes some sense, but comparing moderate use of one to heavy use of the other is just silly (since both have similar effects at moderate versus high levels).

I don't know how else to explain myself...parts of the discussion were focussed on peole saying it was ok, so several of us reminded people that it's illegal. That should trump everything else, but for many it does not. So, you move to another area - it can also be very dangerous for some poople. That still doesn't work, so there isn't much else. My overriding concern is not that it's illegal, as people don't really care about that - I deal with students who break the law in many ways, on a daily basis. Lots of things are illegal, yet people still do them. My concern is that it changes brain chemistry. I am also concerned with the ties to schizophrenia - we have enough mental illness around us, we don't need to trigger anymore, by an activity that is totally preventable.

I don't like any drugs, period. I don't drink coffee, have never smoked, taken illegal drugs, nor drank alcohol at all in my life. Again, I am not stupid, arrogant or naive enough to think others won't either. People make choices based on many factors, but when it comes to young developing minds, like pre-teens and teens (my students), it is a difficult fight. Just like many people on here who think it's ok to smoke pot, because it's not that bad, or let their kids drink, in order to teach them how to do it right, I don't subscribe to this theory. In our house, you learn that you don't need any substances to feel better. We don't even take that many prescription drugs either (many drug allergies in this house). We just have different coping strategies in place. If the time comes where one of my children feels that's not enough, we will work through it. I parent much differently than many people I know - things are not forbidden, I don't hide things, nor do I lecture, and it's amazing to see how my children respond in a positive manner. My kids knows that there are adult products like cigarettes and alcohol that adults find acceptable to put in their bodies. I am working with them on not judging, and just understanding that everyone makes personal choices, and it's not for us to make them for anyone else. When it comes to children or teens though, we sometimes have to do that, and she knows that too.


Thanks for the discussion. I hope the OP's friend is able to work through a positive solution with her daughter.

Tiger
 
I don't know how else to explain myself...parts of the discussion were focussed on peole saying it was ok, so several of us reminded people that it's illegal. That should trump everything else, but for many it does not. So, you move to another area - it can also be very dangerous for some poople. That still doesn't work, so there isn't much else. I don't like any drugs, period. I don't drink coffee, have never smoked, taken illegal drugs, nor drank alcohol at all in my life. Again, I am not stupid, arrogant or naive enough to think others won't either. People make choices based on many factors, but when it comes to young developing minds, like pre-teens and teens (my students), it is a difficult fight. Just like many people on here who think it's ok to smoke pot, or let their kids drink, in order to teach them how to do it right, I don't subscribe to this theory. In our house, you learn that you don't need any substances to feel better. We don't even take that many prescription drugs either (many drug allergies in this house). We just have different coping strategies in place. If the time comes where one of my children feels that's not enough, we will work through it. I parent much differently than many people I know - things are not forbidden, I don't hide things, nor do I lecture, and it's amazing to see how my children respond in a positive manner. My 7 year old knows that there are adult products like cigarettes and alcohol that adults find acceptable to put in their bodies. I am working with her on not judging (that's hard at age 7), and just understanding that everyone makes personal choices, and it's not for us to make them for anyone else. When it comes to children or teens though, we sometimes have to do that, and she knows that too.

This is a very passionate issue for myself, and my colleagues. It is made more difficult with how adults and society in general, place such a heavy emphasis on substances, whether legal or illegal. We try to teach otherwise at our school, but in all honestly, it's a losing battle...

Thanks for the discussion. I hope the OP's friend is able to work through a positive solution with her daughter.

Tiger
The bolded is the part I was trying to figure out but was not getting:flower3: Maybe it is just so obvious to you that you did not think you needed to spell it out. To me, being illegal does not in any way trump everything else. Actually, there are a number of illegal activities that (if i had to choose the lesser evil) I would much prefer my child be involved in than a number of other totally legal ones. There are even a few illegal things that I would have no issue with whatsoever, other than the risk of breaking the law.

So I am a little confused by this latest post to. You don't forbid things from you kids, or lecture but then at the end you say you sometimes have to make the choices for a child or teen (isn't that you forbidding something then?:confused3).
Anyway, I actually think that you are putting as much emphasis on substances as anybody else (and maybe more than the typical person) by the outright refusal to see many things as anything other than a bad substance. For one example, your kids likely see wine as something people drink in order to get drunk and something which is harmful to be ingested.
My kids didn't realize it could make you drunk until they had spent years seeing it as a more or less normal beverage (pone kids did not drink but kids did not drink coffee or Coke or lots of other things as well). If you had asked my son about wine when he was 5 he probably would have told you it is a drink you have in the evening when you have friends over and want cheese and bread--because they go well together. It would not have been much different to him than hot cocoa being something you drink on cold snowy days, lemonade being for summer picnics, etc.

You see, we never put emphasis on it as a SUBSTANCE--we just treated it like any beverage or food and talked about the good and bad things about it just like we talked about the good and bad of iced tea (caffeinated so not good before bedtime) or lemonade (sugar and sour together is especially bad for your teeth).
 
Just out of curiosity, what would you consider to be a more serious offense that doing something illegal several times a week? (I am 100% not trying to be snide, I just want to understand where you're coming from! :thumbsup2) Also, don't you think what the OP's friend's daughter is doing is "extensive?" Several times a week is more than socially/experimentally! I read your previous post about your husband getting high every day and still getting an MBA-- good for him getting his degree, but he could have been kicked out of college for getting caught smoking pot! Also, I'd imagine if he was getting high everyday, he had a rather large supply in his dorm room-- if it were large enough, he could have been arrested for a felony and sent to jail! Would you want your kids to think that's okay-- to risk college and thousands of dollars, not to mention future jobs on something that "makes them feel good?" Again, because I know how it feels to be attacked on the Dis, I'm not trying to be accusatory or rude, I just want to understand and see your point of view! :thumbsup2
...

Well, for your information, he was kicked out of his dorm in his first year, for hosting a party, so that wouldn't have been a problem. :lmao: As for having a large supply, please, he was a college student - he didn't know how he was going to pay for his next meal. He and his friends did get arrested once in HS for having pot, but he took the whole blame, because his dad (my FIL) wouldn't go ballistic, and they said it would be removed from his record when he was 18 (it was). There is no way he would've ever had enough pot on him to be a big legal problem.
 
Well, for your information, he was kicked out of his dorm in his first year, for hosting a party, so that wouldn't have been a problem. :lmao: As for having a large supply, please, he was a college student - he didn't know how he was going to pay for his next meal. He and his friends did get arrested once in HS for having pot, but he took the whole blame, because his dad (my FIL) wouldn't go ballistic, and they said it would be removed from his record when he was 18 (it was). There is no way he would've ever had enough pot on him to be a big legal problem.

Has he grown up to be a perfectly decent adult? I bet he has:thumbsup2

Oh I forgot to answer this myself:flower3:

Just one example: I would be more upset if my teen were to be sleeping with several different boys every week and not using protection to boot(totally legal though) than if she were smoking one or two joints 2-3 times a week. Actually I would be much more upset by the former. Niether one is my ideal scenario (by a loooooong shot) but one is a lot more upsetting that the other.
 
The bolded is the part I was trying to figure out but was not getting:flower3: Maybe it is just so obvious to you that you did not think you needed to spell it out. To me, being illegal does not in any way trump everything else. Actually, there are a number of illegal activities that (if i had to choose the lesser evil) I would much prefer my child be involved in than a number of other totally legal ones. There are even a few illegal things that I would have no issue with whatsoever, other than the risk of breaking the law.

So I am a little confused by this latest post to. You don't forbid things from you kids, or lecture but then at the end you say you sometimes have to make the choices for a child or teen (isn't that you forbidding something then?:confused3).
Anyway, I actually think that you are putting as much emphasis on substances as anybody else (and maybe more than the typical person) by the outright refusal to see many things as anything other than a bad substance. For one example, your kids likely see wine as something people drink in order to get drunk and something which is harmful to be ingested.
My kids didn't realize it could make you drunk until they had spent years seeing it as a more or less normal beverage (pone kids did not drink but kids did not drink coffee or Coke or lots of other things as well). If you had asked my son about wine when he was 5 he probably would have told you it is a drink you have in the evening when you have friends over and want cheese and bread--because they go well together. It would not have been much different to him than hot cocoa being something you drink on cold snowy days, lemonade being for summer picnics, etc.

You see, we never put emphasis on it as a SUBSTANCE--we just treated it like any beverage or food and talked about the good and bad things about it just like we talked about the good and bad of iced tea (caffeinated so not good before bedtime) or lemonade (sugar and sour together is especially bad for your teeth).

Just a few clarifications:

Kids vs students - My kids are my own children, not my students.

Forbidden - I haven't really forbidden anything in my home. We don't drink alcohol or pop, but they aren't forbidden. The kids know they contain chemicals that might hurt their bodies - give them a headache, hurt their tummies or bad for their teeth. We deal with things as age appropriate. They know when they are older and of age, they may choose to drink alcohol or coffee, but while they are little, we just don't think it's appropriate for them. No issues at all. I can't make choices for my kids for when they are adults...if they choose to drink alcohol, hopefully they will do so in a responsible manner.

Drunk/high - My kids have never seen anyone drunk or high. They are little, so they have no concept that substances can change behaviour or make them loopy. They are too young to grasp that whole concept. They know that alcohol and cigarettes can be dangerous to our bodies, no matter what age we are.

Making choices for kids - Obviously I am talking about extenuating circumstances or emergency situations. These always trump everything else, so it would depend upon the situation, but I guess it could be the same as forbidding, but these situations only come along once in awhile, in special circumstances. We always stress that people need to learn to make their own choices, but sometimes, mommy and daddy need to step in for safety reasons, for example. We want our kids to make good and responsible choices as adults, so forbidding or always making choices for them won't teach them to do that. Alcohol and cigarettes are adult products in our home, and the kids know that. Mommy and daddy don't drink or smoke, and that is our choice. Smoking and illegal drugs are forbidden in our home, but that's not an issue at this time. If it does become one, we will work with them when that time comes. Our kids trust us very much, as we have open communication, and so they know that even if they do something wrong, they can come to us, and so far, they have. May change in the future, but we will do our best to always keep open communication and support them in making good and healty choices.

Substances - We don't use the word 'substance'. Our kids know that adult drinks have chemicals in them, that aren't good for little bodies. But they also know that many adults like to drink wine. They just think it's a stronger drink that adults like, just like coffee. They have no preconceived notions about being drunk, etc. as they have no idea about being drunk. We use the term adult drinks, and they are good with that. They know there are adult TV shows that aren't appropriate for kids, and so it's the same idea. They know if it's for adults, it's not for kids. We don't use the word 'bad', we just say that a certain food or drink might be unhealthy for children, or a certain TV program might scare them, and they are good with that.

Hope this clears things up, Tiger
 
For me, the only risks associated with pot smoking are those tied to over-reaching laws. Since I don't support those laws, I really don't have a problem with pot smoking. I choose not to smoke pot (have not done so in over 20 years), but I would not be greatly concerned if I discovered that my son was smoking pot at 16 or 17 years old. In fact, I would consider it to be normal.

So, if you are trying to understand then consider that some people really are not afraid of pot, nor do they consider its use to be of any greater concern than many other things. And, some people do not make their decision about how they will react to something based on the legality of that something.

Pot smoking just isn't a big deal to me. I am much more concerned about my son practicing safe sex.

Hmm, I see your point. I don't agree with it, but I get it. I personally, when the time comes, will be concerned with BOTH drug use and safe sex.
I get disagreeing with laws, but for me, they are what they are. I think the speed limit on the street off our house is too slow, but I'd still get a ticket and have to pay the consequences if I got caught speeding. Just because you don't think pot laws make sense doesn't mean your kid would get in any less trouble if they were caught smoking. However, again, I understand your view. :thumbsup2
 
Well, for your information, he was kicked out of his dorm in his first year, for hosting a party, so that wouldn't have been a problem. :lmao: As for having a large supply, please, he was a college student - he didn't know how he was going to pay for his next meal. He and his friends did get arrested once in HS for having pot, but he took the whole blame, because his dad (my FIL) wouldn't go ballistic, and they said it would be removed from his record when he was 18 (it was). There is no way he would've ever had enough pot on him to be a big legal problem.

LOL about getting kicked out of his dorm! I know college kids will do what they will, and for me personally, the idea of my kid possibly going to jail for something that feels good for a little while is frightening and I'd do whatever I could to make sure they understood the risks of such behavior and why (in my opinion) it's absolutely not worth the risk. I'm glad your husband is so successful and was arrested before 18 (and he wasn't my parent's child, because if I got arrested before 18 for smoking pot, I'd be kicked out of the house) so it didn't affect him long term! Like I said to BamaFan, I don't agree with your point but definitely understand it-- I see where you're coming from. Have a great holiday!
 
Having three kids, youngest of which is 19 now. We've been down this road a few times. Reality is...it's illegal, and you will be drug tested by almost any employer. So if you want to go the route of "no big deal"...that's wrong, it will be a big deal when they can't get a job. All of my kids know of someone who was turned down for employment because they smoked weed.
I'm also probably the only mom of a teen that wishes the drinking age was 18 again. (which it was when I was young and dinosaurs roamed the earth:laughing:). When kids today drink, they drink as if they're never gonna see alcohol ever again. Thus the binge drinking. Back in the "old days" if you wanted a beer after work, you could have one. You didn't need to drink a case, thinking that you might not have another any time soon. I think EDUCATION is what was needed in regard to drinking responsibly, and that's what made a difference, not raising the drinking age. Yet, I digress..
As for pot...the thing is, its WAY more potent these days. So while some here are getting a chuckle from reliving their youth and shrug their shoulders with a "no big deal" response, the "product" has also changed. It's also often laced with more potent and addictive drugs.
I agree with the poster who works with kids who use regularly. Now it's pot, then it's laced with other things to give it more kick.
I think condoning it as no big deal to 15 and 16 year olds..is the wrong message to send. I wouldn't condone alcohol for kids that young either. Are you going to supply them a list of drugs that are acceptable, and a list that aren't?:confused3...Really, where do you draw the line. :confused:
Again, it's been my experience that so many kids turn to drugs, as it's readily available and so EASY to obtain. Certainly drug dealers aren't asking for their ID.

:thumbsup2 Addiction runs in my family. I've talked to DD (13) about drinking and drugs. She is well aware under-age drinking and drugs will not be tolerated. Smoking pot does often lead to other drugs.
An ex's little brother smoked with friends, and ended up in ICU because it was laced with PCP. Most weed today is laced with something, and it's not the weed from the 70's. He recovered, but he's now serving a life sentence in prison for murdering someone for drugs. The family is very upper class, he had too much money and time, and too little support-his family always said it was "just pot", not a big deal.
 
If I was a parent, this concern would trump my concerns about pot.

:thumbsup2

You smoke pot: perhaps you gain 5 pounds from munchies, kill a few brain cells.
You have unsafe sex: imagine the possibilities.

They're not even comparable to me.
 
Hmm, I see your point. I don't agree with it, but I get it...

Cool - That is all I was trying to accomplish. I certainly am not trying to convince others that my opinions are right - just trying to explain my point of view. :thumbsup2
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom