When my kids were little, they knew when they went grocery shopping they would get a special treat of a donut they could munch on while shopping. It wasn't a bribe (although I wasn't above that!), it was just a nice little thing they got to do. Of course they were always paid for along with the rest of the groceries. Can't for the life of me figure out why it matters to anyone whether an item is paid for before or after consumption so long as it's being paid for.
A couple of people have raised the assumption that the food is not yours until it's paid for, which makes me wonder about restaurants. You are served food there, you eat it, but you don't pay for it until afterwards. How is that different? By the original logic, you should pay for your meal prior to consuming because it's not yours until it's paid for.And you can't say "because you don't know what your total will be until after you've eaten" because the same thing applies to grocery shopping!
![]()
Looks like we both had the same idea where restaurants are concerned.
