When my kids were little, they knew when they went grocery shopping they would get a special treat of a donut they could munch on while shopping. It wasn't a bribe (although I wasn't above that!), it was just a nice little thing they got to do. Of course they were always paid for along with the rest of the groceries. Can't for the life of me figure out why it matters to anyone whether an item is paid for before or after consumption so long as it's being paid for.
A couple of people have raised the assumption that the food is not yours until it's paid for, which makes me wonder about restaurants. You are served food there, you eat it, but you don't pay for it until afterwards. How is that different? By the original logic, you should pay for your meal prior to consuming because it's not yours until it's paid for.And you can't say "because you don't know what your total will be until after you've eaten" because the same thing applies to grocery shopping!
![]()
Looks like we both had the same idea where restaurants are concerned.
And you can't say "because you don't know what your total will be until after you've eaten" because the same thing applies to grocery shopping!

They actively encourage it! They have the little stands on weekends with samples, and such too. So where do you draw the line?
If a child is SO hungry that they just can't wait until the car or they get home for a snack; then maybe it's not the right time to be at the grocery store and better planning is in order. (Spoken to everyone, not directed at whoever I quoted!)
I just wait until I reach the grocery store/Wal Mart/Home Depot and grab a 21 ounce drink there for a more reasonable price. I always pay for it. I've also been know to eat a bag of M&M's in line for the checkout, which I pay for as well. I also usually end up buying a small travel size of tissue in Wal Mart and Target because i always start sneezing, and wouldn't it be weirder to carry in your own BOX of Kleenex in with you? 
